CSTWell, we hit that mark and haven’t heard about Freeman. My guess would be that Matt Jones thought Rancik was coming to Ky.
I think Matt Jones made some guarantee that we’d get a commitment from either Rancik or Freeman by 1 o’clock today.I may have missed it about the by 1:00 thing.
Jones did no such thing.I think Matt Jones made some guarantee that we’d get a commitment from either Rancik or Freeman by 1 o’clock today.
Rancik is now gone, and we’re past 1 … so it sure seems like we should be getting that Freeman commitment any minute now.
wasn’t there a post yesterday about this?Jones did no such thing.
You started the thread. Why are you asking others?wasn’t there a post yesterday about this?
I just bumped the thread. Check it out.Jones never said anything about Sunday.
Why are we listening to Matt Jones? He literally said this past week that he doesn’t talk to anyone on the staff. He’s a blowhard. I trust him and Jeff Goodman basically the same.I think Matt Jones made some guarantee that we’d get a commitment from either Rancik or Freeman by 1 o’clock today.
Rancik is now gone, and we’re past 1 … so it sure seems like we should be getting that Freeman commitment any minute now.
Yes he did. He said SHOULD get either Freeman or Rancik by today, but he guaranteed nothing, and certainly didn’t give a time frame.Jones never said anything about Sunday.
Well at one point I saw a post saying by 1:00 tomorrow, thought it was the Matt Jones post so I may have confused the post is why I asked! Thank you for your useless snarky reply, now head back down to the basement.You started the thread. Why are you asking others?
People probably misheard due to the nose whistle.He said one of Rancik or Freeman by the end of the day today. Nothing about 1 PM
Yes he did. He said SHOULD get either Freeman or Rancik by today, but he guaranteed nothing, and certainly didn’t give a time frame.
No he didn't say ,1I think Matt Jones made some guarantee that we’d get a commitment from either Rancik or Freeman by 1 o’clock today.
Rancik is now gone, and we’re past 1 … so it sure seems like we should be getting that Freeman commitment any minute now.
Yes he did but he didn't say 1Jones never said anything about Sunday.
Not exactly, he is a lawyer and words have specific meanings. His exact quote is: "Kentucky will have (absent a major change) either Freeman or Rancik by tomorrow" "Will" is not the same as "should."
Fair enough. I was just repeating what I thought I recalled hearing. My bad.No he didn't say ,1
I see, said the blind man. (Your name fits you well)Well at one point I saw a post saying by 1:00 tomorrow…
We know he does this on this boardWhat happened to "2 commits by Friday, and 4 by Sunday," and then still "4 by Sunday," and then "1 on Saturday, and the other on Sunday, and "X is a done deal"... ?
Same thing as always. Nothing but guesses by people that hope the timing works out that they happen to be "right." Ssdd
He's not a lawyer. He has a law degree. And barely ever actually practiced law.Not exactly, he is a lawyer and words have specific meanings. His exact quote is: "Kentucky will have (absent a major change) either Freeman or Rancik by tomorrow" "Will" is not the same as "should."
Because he started KSR and rode the fan interest in the Patrick Patterson and Jai Lucas recruitments and posting his link on the Rivals board.He's not a lawyer. He has a law degree. And barely ever actually practiced law.
Plenty of room for both.....needed bothRancik was a better option than Freeman, IMO
I'm glad I read the comments; I was getting ready to post that it wasn't one yet in Hawaii.1:00 pm Hawaii time. Easy mistake. And if it doesn’t happen by then, it probably means you mistakenly used the Gregorian calendar.![]()
I’m patiently waiting. Two hundred more years according to the Mayan calendar.I'm glad I read the comments; I was getting ready to post that it wasn't one yet in Hawaii.
Thanks for the clarification. Having said that, the point still stands that anyone who has studied law on any level certainly understands the difference between "will" and "should."He's not a lawyer. He has a law degree. And barely ever actually practiced law.