*****Andrew McKeever commits to IOWA*****

The Big Z

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
1,751
3,299
113
Makes you think Ben might want to play more than 8 or 9 per game ;)

And Jirak might see action, too
He’s never played more than 8-9 in his career. Will be interesting to see as we have a logjam of small forwards, big guards. If Banks doesn’t come back which seems unlikely now, I’m assuming Thompson moves into that spot. But, we know Ben trust’s experience. We need someone who can replace Banks’s defense and toughness for sure. And we also know Thompson didn’t play because he was young and behind on defense.
 

Max Rebo

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2022
688
1,866
93
He’s never played more than 8-9 in his career. Will be interesting to see as we have a logjam of small forwards, big guards. If Banks doesn’t come back which seems unlikely now, I’m assuming Thompson moves into that spot. But, we know Ben trust’s experience. We need someone who can replace Banks’s defense and toughness for sure. And we also know Thompson didn’t play because he was young and behind on defense.
I’m thinking we end up something like this:

Starters:
Coleman
Combs
Sage
Koch
McKeever

Howard is top reserve in the backcourt, but one of Coleman/Combs is always on the floor to run the point.

Thompson and Harris are your top reserves at the forward spots.

Manyawu is backup center.

Spot/situational minutes for Coon and Jirak … Coon may get more time when/if he’s ready; Jirak gets more time if someone is in foul trouble or we need size.

It would not surprise me to see Howard starting ahead of Coleman, or Manyawu starting ahead of McKeever, at least at the start of the season. (After all, most everyone penciled Hausen and Folgueiras into the starting lineup last year, and neither happened.)

Deep bench is Matteoni, J. Koch, and McCollum.
 

SoonerBeAHawk

Senior
Nov 27, 2005
341
691
93
Agreed, but I question if he will be able to move like that against Big Ten teams. It's refreshing to see games from small conferences where agility and technique is rewarded vs bulk and strength. But I'll be excited to find out. Purdue wanted him and they're in the big man business so that's good enough for me.
Yeah, along the same lines how is he with contact?

Does he seek it, or is he just okay with it, or does he actually tend to avoid it? Hopefully he's got some Garza in him and/or there's someone on staff to bring that out (a la Frank, as previously mentioned) .

And yep, the Purdue interest alone would make you want to take a flyer on him. Gonna be fun to see how he pans out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skydog0784a!

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,425
3,670
113
Let's say Banks returns and all 15 roster spots are filled.

If Ben only plays 9, who are the 2 additional players who would join these 4 when it comes to little to no playing time?

Jacob Koch
Joey Matteoni
Trevin Jirak
Peyton McCollum
Well the hope is that the hawks are so good they are blowing teams out with 10 minutes to go and can give the end of the bench players some minutes. All 15 players on the team know who are the starters and the better players. But coaches need to get their younger players some time when they have a big lead. as an aside, I always thought that Kirk F was way too late putting in his backup QB in real games to give them reps.
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,425
3,670
113
How do we get Garza, and his dad too probably, to come back over the summer to give this guy some work? The highlight video looks like he has skills. Then you see he only shot 50% on the year from the floor, which is pretty bad for a big man like that. Room for improvement, but I like what we’re starting with.
I have never seem him play and I wonder if he missed a lot of close in shots because of some small bumping him that maybe some practice and coaching can help him focus to make shots
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,425
3,670
113
Interesting stuff.

Full text of tweet:

Andrew McKeever naturally has a ton of gravity as a roller as a 7-2 giant. McCollum will have a ton of fun scheming Pick and Roll with the big fella at his disposal.

Iowa was 2nd in the country in % of possessions last year ending with the roll man

McKeever shot 71% as a roll man
compared to 43% on post ups in 2025-26

Check this out & watch:



That is some ballet basketball in that video, exciting is the word. I had practically skipped watching Fran's last 4 teams until about mid to late January.
 

Palmerhawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
1,784
3,491
113
Andrew is huge and as with most huge players, not particularly fluid on the court.

We will have to accept that.
Luka Garza is not fluid either, as he runs down the court pumping and flailing his arms and legs But as we know Luka had fire in belly attitude that he simply willed himself down that court by sheer desire and work.

Hopefully Andrew also is a worker.
I like the versatility of Andrew/ Cam gives us matchup wise.
Some opponents like Illinois feature huge big men, but others,like Nebraska and MSU had more mobile guys who could shoot from arc...now we have an answer for all commers...hopefully.
 

iahawkeyes17

All-Conference
Apr 22, 2014
681
1,790
83
Yeah, who cares what we are ranked in the 2026 portal season.

And, really, who cares that we finished in 9th place in the B1G.

What matters, for better or for worse, is how you do in the NCAA Tournament. Think of the memories that have been made from that Elite 8 run.
There are always guys not in top 50 that are hidden gems or the non seniors who develop over time. Jefferson for the clones I think was ranked in the 80-90 best portal additions. Tonje for Wisconsin 2 years who we had for a visit was considered a good get but far exceeded expectations.

I do think the coach matters a lot too how they incorporate transfers and teams meshes together and play as a whole. Pope at Kentucky brought in a ton of mercenaries and was a disaster or devries and IU. Flip side the good coaches like May or Hurley do a phenomenal job mixing returning players, with portal and HS guys. Why I’m excited for next year have a lot of continuity with all the guys returning.
 

iahawkeyes17

All-Conference
Apr 22, 2014
681
1,790
83
I’m thinking we end up something like this:

Starters:
Coleman
Combs
Sage
Koch
McKeever

Howard is top reserve in the backcourt, but one of Coleman/Combs is always on the floor to run the point.

Thompson and Harris are your top reserves at the forward spots.

Manyawu is backup center.

Spot/situational minutes for Coon and Jirak … Coon may get more time when/if he’s ready; Jirak gets more time if someone is in foul trouble or we need size.

It would not surprise me to see Howard starting ahead of Coleman, or Manyawu starting ahead of McKeever, at least at the start of the season. (After all, most everyone penciled Hausen and Folgueiras into the starting lineup last year, and neither happened.)

Deep bench is Matteoni, J. Koch, and McCollum.
curious how much jirek develops. Can he backup and give us 8-10 min a game? Against bigger teams like ILL and Purdue will need another big body. But with cam we can move him to 5 against smaller teams or depending on lineups they have. Saw how vs OSU when they didn’t have 7 ft at carver vs to having him in BTT how much more effective he was in first game.
 

nu2u

All-Conference
Aug 10, 2006
10,263
2,348
113
curious how much jirek develops. Can he backup and give us 8-10 min a game? Against bigger teams like ILL and Purdue will need another big body. But with cam we can move him to 5 against smaller teams or depending on lineups they have. Saw how vs OSU when they didn’t have 7 ft at carver vs to having him in BTT how much more effective he was in first game.
Manyawu will be a senior, multi-year/multi-game starter, 4th year in McCollum’s system averaging around 20 minutes per game.

McKeever is the high priced much sought after 7ft3 transfer with a full year of starter experience.

I don’t see how Jirek plays much if at all with the Manyawu and McKeever manning the low post position. More likely that he takes a redshirt next season.
 

The Big Z

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
1,751
3,299
113
Manyawu will be a senior, multi-year/multi-game starter, 4th year in McCollum’s system averaging around 20 minutes per game.

McKeever is the high priced much sought after 7ft3 transfer with a full year of starter experience.

I don’t see how Jirek plays much if at all with the Manyawu and McKeever manning the low post position. More likely that he takes a redshirt next season.
1000% agree with this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ComradeKirk

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
15,248
22,715
113
One podcaster said McKeever is expected to fetch between 2 - 4 million dollars. Crazy. I get that must be where the market is at, but still ...crazy!!!

Anyway, I think I read that he's also been considered as high as the no. 2 big in the portal. As a portal dummy I'm wondering how these numbers comport with an overall ranking of only 106?

Good questions.

Lets say he got $3M. The agent then likely gets between $300,000 and $600,000.

Aren't amateur sports great? ;)
 

TweeterHawk

Senior
Nov 15, 2021
237
425
63
I think Ramos and Woodbury were the only guys that we had that was officially over 7’ tall. A bunch of 6’11”/6’10” guys like Reiner, Hanson, Olaseni, and Garza in the last 25 years. Kunnert, Stokes, and Payne were also up in that range.
Some of you kids weren’t alive 45 years ago when Iowa had not one but two tall guys on campus: Michael Payne at 6-11 and Greg Stokes at 6-10. While an inch taller, Payne didn’t have the full body mass and was more a finesse player playing forward. Stokes weighed 220 pounds and was more of a banger, not quite Iowa’s version of Charles Barkley but close. Together they were known as the “Twin Towers.” They had been recruited by Lute Olson as he built a powerful Iowa program and were a defensive presence in the paint (although Stokes was shlt protecting against the back door cut, a scouting factoid exploited by many coaches.) Still they were fun to watch.

Welcome to Iowa, Mr. McKeever! Looking forward to seeing you in a Hawkeye uniform!
 

SB_SB

All-Conference
Dec 17, 2022
1,570
2,875
113
Some of you kids weren’t alive 45 years ago when Iowa had not one but two tall guys on campus: Michael Payne at 6-11 and Greg Stokes at 6-10. While an inch taller, Payne didn’t have the full body mass and was more a finesse player playing forward. Stokes weighed 220 pounds and was more of a banger, not quite Iowa’s version of Charles Barkley but close. Together they were known as the “Twin Towers.” They had been recruited by Lute Olson as he built a powerful Iowa program and were a defensive presence in the paint (although Stokes was shlt protecting against the back door cut, a scouting factoid exploited by many coaches.) Still they were fun to watch.

Welcome to Iowa, Mr. McKeever! Looking forward to seeing you in a Hawkeye uniform!
I think Stokes and Payne were actually closer to 6-8 and 6-9. Stokes was a great player.

I thought Lohaus was 7ft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerBeAHawk

The Big Z

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
1,751
3,299
113
Some of you kids weren’t alive 45 years ago when Iowa had not one but two tall guys on campus: Michael Payne at 6-11 and Greg Stokes at 6-10. While an inch taller, Payne didn’t have the full body mass and was more a finesse player playing forward. Stokes weighed 220 pounds and was more of a banger, not quite Iowa’s version of Charles Barkley but close. Together they were known as the “Twin Towers.” They had been recruited by Lute Olson as he built a powerful Iowa program and were a defensive presence in the paint (although Stokes was shlt protecting against the back door cut, a scouting factoid exploited by many coaches.) Still they were fun to watch.

Welcome to Iowa, Mr. McKeever! Looking forward to seeing you in a Hawkeye uniform!
Barkley and Stokes were nothing alike.
 

Hawkeye1984

Senior
Jul 29, 2022
382
722
93
Our hobby is to see just how dumb your comments can be
What a hobby? If you’re hobby consists of trolling comments, and randomly bashing people, maybe I should have said get a life? And again you do not have to read them.
 

TweeterHawk

Senior
Nov 15, 2021
237
425
63
I think Stokes and Payne were actually closer to 6-8 and 6-9. Stokes was a great player.

I thought Lohaus was 7ft.
Posted the numbers I remember from a long time ago (6-11 and 6-10) and are in their online bios. Did someone in the SID’s office exaggerate? 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: AndreTheHawk

SoonerBeAHawk

Senior
Nov 27, 2005
341
691
93
Posted the numbers I remember from a long time ago (6-11 and 6-10) and are in their online bios. Did someone in the SID’s office exaggerate? 🤷‍♂️
Exagerating players' heights, especially back in the day, I think was kinda common, and I do seem to remember that was what occurred with with Stokes and Payne.

Payne, iirc, was the slightly higher rated recruit (1st team Parade?) but Stokes evolved into the more effective talent. Great recruiting class!