Lino Mark set to return to Rutgers Basketball for 2026-27 season
Rutgers Basketball locked down their second returnee of the offseason, as guard Lino Mark announces his return for the 2026-27 season.
He was 0 for his first 18 3 point shots as he grew accustomed to the college game. After that he shot close to 40% so you could argue he has already acheived your target. I am very glad Lino is back. Huge potential.If he can improve his 3-point shooting to at least 30%, he can be a real weapon. Even 30% isn’t that good, but it’s at least a credible threat, and defenders can’t just back off and guard for the dribble drive.
You have no idea what you’re talking about, sign up for premium and you’ll see the backstory behind both those things.Good news. Classic for this site, some dumb *** posts he is gone after the season and then it gets repeated until it is accepted as fact. Just like Ola Adams is going to be the next DC, and Greg did not even talk to him.
They started reporting he might come back for weeksGood news. Classic for this site, some dumb *** posts he is gone after the season and then it gets repeated until it is accepted as fact. Just like Ola Adams is going to be the next DC, and Greg did not even talk to him.
Don’t let facts get in the way of his narrative.They started reporting he might come back for weeks
Hopefully he makes the next step and we can utilize him off the bench.
We need better than Lino as a starter. I love him as a bench rotation piece, but he’s a no go as a starter. We were supposed to get starting level players in the portal.I'm assuming the staff currently has him as the projected starter alongside Francis.
The staff’s plan is to get a starting point guard in the portal.
The first addition from the portal being a Complete Unknown helped add to the sentiment of things not looking too hot at the moment. If the first addition was a legit center that we spent $3-$4 mil to get, it would be a totally different spin, we would praise them for going all out and then we would have a much different view than we do right now. However, that was not the first addition. I was really expecting our first addition to be a legit starter, a frontcourt player either a center or power forward.The unfortunate fallout from the early predictions that Lino was a goner was that several posters went on rants against Coach Pikiell saying he was an idiot to play a kid who was already out the door. That is reason enough to let this portal season play out before ripping (or praising) the coaching staff and GM. Things definitely don't look so hot at the moment, but only time will tell.
100%.The unfortunate fallout from the early predictions that Lino was a goner was that several posters went on rants against Coach Pikiell saying he was an idiot to play a kid who was already out the door. That is reason enough to let this portal season play out before ripping (or praising) the coaching staff and GM. Things definitely don't look so hot at the moment, but only time will tell.
Personally I think you should’ve spent $6m on three players (PG, F, C) and the rest on retention. To run it back with the same undersized backcourt seems extremely risky to me, but that’s just my opinion.Not to be a jerk, but it seems the staff may have flunked math class…
A center who logged 18 mpg for a team that didn’t even make the NCAAs, grabbed less rpg than Ogbole, and scored less ppg than J Mike is about to collect 4.5M. We have to buy a whole frontcourt - starters and back ups. We don’t have enough money to throw at a PG who is materially better than the guys we already have. I’d love for the math to somehow work but it seems impossible.
@Richie O How many starters do you think are here and on the roster now? (I am hoping only TF) I assumed TF was only guy who would start, maybe Buchanan (but really think he’s a bench guy) and they would bring in 3-4 starters. Not so sure now.Personally I think you should’ve spent $6m on three players (PG, F, C) and the rest on retention. To run it back with the same undersized backcourt seems extremely risky to me, but that’s just my opinion.
I agree with you, but right now it sounds like two or three depending on how they decide to play Buchanan and they can find in terms of both fit and money.@Richie O How many starters do you think are here and on the roster now? (I am hoping only TF) I assumed TF was only guy who would start, maybe Buchanan (but really think he’s a bench guy) and they would bring in 3-4 starters. Not so sure now.
Hopefully he gets consistent enough to startHopefully he makes the next step and we can utilize him off the bench.
Not to be a jerk, but it seems the staff may have flunked math class…
A center who logged 18 mpg for a team that didn’t even make the NCAAs, grabbed less rpg than Ogbole, and scored less ppg than J Mike is about to collect 4.5M. We have to buy a whole frontcourt - starters and back ups. We don’t have enough money to throw at a PG who is materially better than the guys we already have. I’d love for the math to somehow work but it seems impossible.
You are right. Its not giving me good vibes to bring back the same back court and not upgrading talent level of jmike and powersPersonally I think you should’ve spent $6m on three players (PG, F, C) and the rest on retention. To run it back with the same undersized backcourt seems extremely risky to me, but that’s just my opinion.
True! I just feel currently we don’t have a big ten caliber guard. TF can be a rotation player on some teams but if we are competing to get in the tournament we are off to a rough start.Hopefully he gets consistent enough to start
Personally I think you should’ve spent $6m on three players (PG, F, C) and the rest on retention. To run it back with the same undersized backcourt seems extremely risky to me, but that’s just my opinion.
He’s 8 for his last 18 for a 44.4% clip. He’s a little undersized but his ultra-elite quickness gets him layup opportunities as defenders scramble to keep up and he’s a good finisher. Averages as many steals as turnovers. All-BigTen ability.He was 0 for his first 18 3 point shots as he grew accustomed to the college game. After that he shot close to 40% so you could argue he has already acheived your target. I am very glad Lino is back. Huge potential.
They started reporting he might come back for weeks
He’s 8 for his last 18 for a 44.4% clip. He’s a little undersized but his ultra-elite quickness gets him layup opportunities as defenders scramble to keep up and he’s a good finisher. Averages as many steals as turnovers. All-BigTen ability.
If you’re still consider a transfer, can you play Center? We could use a few of them….FFS, even I wanted to transfer by the time we got to January. Things change.
Arguably he did improve his 3 point shooting dramatically last season. Mark started the season 0-18 from 3 last season which was impressively bad. After that he shot 40% from 3, which was around what he shotgun high school.If he can improve his 3-point shooting to at least 30%, he can be a real weapon. Even 30% isn’t that good, but it’s at least a credible threat, and defenders can’t just back off and guard for the dribble drive.
The majority of the commentators as well as the moderators of this message board would likely disagree about starting Mark and would like Rutgers to get a quality point guard in the portal. Pikiel likely is going to rely on some combination of Mark, Davis and Francis. This might be needed as with the inflated costs of big men, it now seems likely that just to get okay players at center and power forward which is desperately needed will eat up tremendous amounts of the available NIL.I do think the plan now is to start Lino, and I do believe he’ll be a better distributor and assist guy if we land a dynamic 4 and a more dominant 5.
The issue with his stats as a PG will come down to 2 factors, imo: 1) is he willing to be less selfish, and 2) will ball-dominant Francis leave enough assist opportunities for Lino?
I’ve said before that our best chance for success would be if Francis could develop into our starting PG. Then you could have shooters with good size at the 2 and 3 spots to go with strong 2-way players at the 4 and 5.
With Lino and Francis both starting you have two guys that are less complimentary to each other versus the scenario I just described. Not to mention their lack of size will be an issue when they play together.
I hope it works out, but I’m afraid Lino will end up being selfish again when playing alongside Francis. Just my two cents, and I hope I’m wrong about that.