How Confident are you on Pope's 3rd Year Portal Success

Will Pope have success in the Portal?

  • Yes, he finally has a good portal class

    Votes: 7 7.0%
  • High moderate success: lands 1-2 top portal prospects + Stokes

    Votes: 4 4.0%
  • Moderate success: lands a few solid mid-tier portal prospects + Stokes

    Votes: 14 14.0%
  • Limited success: lands Stokes but mostly lower-tier or depth pieces

    Votes: 7 7.0%
  • Whiff God on Good Portal Prospects

    Votes: 68 68.0%

  • Total voters
    100

MdWIldcat55

Heisman
Dec 9, 2007
21,292
84,959
113
Kentucky, and Pope, deserve some luck this year after everything that has gone wrong the past two.
But I'm afraid that...



I think Pope will get a class that looks pretty good on paper -- slightly better by portal ratings than last year, not counting Quaintance who was a net zero. The money is certainly there.

That gets Kentucky elevated to top 15-20 status in pre-season polls. But ALL these guys are a crap shoot moving up from mid-majors or coming in from Euro leagues or even Top Twenty high school recruits. Does a guy over achieve like Amari Williams or disappoint like so many?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JASUN74 and TFCat11

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
10,795
21,241
66
TBD.

I’m not a speculator because there’s nothing more useless in this world than speculation.

I’m more of a see how it shakes out and evaluate the finished roster type.

Gut feeling is middle of the road class, no Stokes, next year will be a struggle unless the pieces fit exceptionally well and mesh quickly.
 

peterpiper09

All-Conference
Mar 19, 2006
1,098
2,170
112
Either he does great and we get back to playing and competing with anybody OR he shanks it and we are 21-13 next season. He knows the deal. I hope he kills it, BUT to be honest, I’m not worrying about it. Life’s too short.
I kind of feel like he’s gonna do well in the portal, but it’s a shame overall that the game most grew up watching is no longer what it once was. It’s nothing more than a circus now.

I like a good argument as good as anyone, but today’s game has caused lots of people to be bitter with each other and that’s no good.
 

TFCat11

Heisman
Mar 25, 2019
5,841
10,365
108
Contrary to belief by some on here, I’ve been cheering for Pope since after his press conference, but the data is in, and the facts speak for themselves…

He has yet to win a recruitment for a non Kentucky recruit in HS, has signed zero 5*s
(JJ wasn’t one), and has yet to win a recruitment for ANY of his first priority portal transfers…

But, I’m the a-hole on here posting lies and hate!

No, some of y’all live in an imaginary world where you ignore the facts and available data, and instead lash out at those pointing out the facts and available data.

Let me have it, I’ve got thick skin and no ego, and I can absorb your frustrations with the coach, even though you refuse to direct it towards the actual source of said frustrations 👍🏼
 

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
248
388
63
Honestly and this is not just to crap on Pope but at this point it is what it is. He missed on all his hs targets. Recruited dink pate the last several months and lost him to Providence. It's not looking good. Of course he will sign some guys but it won't be the talent needed at UK. Another mediocre season.

Does anybody expect anything different? Ik we hope he does good but are we really expecting him to?
 

KYFOSSIL

Heisman
Jan 13, 2005
7,744
10,333
62
Contrary to belief by some on here, I’ve been cheering for Pope since after his press conference, but the data is in, and the facts speak for themselves…

He has yet to win a recruitment for a non Kentucky recruit in HS, has signed zero 5*s
(JJ wasn’t one), and has yet to win a recruitment for ANY of his first priority portal transfers…

But, I’m the a-hole on here posting lies and hate!

No, some of y’all live in an imaginary world where you ignore the facts and available data, and instead lash out at those pointing out the facts and available data.

Let me have it, I’ve got thick skin and no ego, and I can absorb your frustrations with the coach, even though you refuse to direct it towards the actual source of said frustrations 👍🏼
And now you're playing the martyr card man you seriously pathetic. Most people aren't even disagreeing with the concepts. You're concerned about. It's literally your pounded in every single day on every thread, even if it has nothing to do with Pope and people like you have turned this site into trash. Like I said before they're plenty of negative threads so spew all you want on those but what do you do on any bit of news especially if it resembles anything positive you have to go in a spew your crap. Congratulations on having thick skin now try to work on that weak spine.
 
Jul 30, 2024
5,893
11,330
113
I don’t feel that any of your options are what I would expect. Also, it’d help if you define what a top portal guy is: top 10, top 25, top 50 etc. Almost all of your options are with Stokes. I think we are likely to have a top portal class (LIKE WE DID LAST YEAR) but I do not think Stokes will be a Cat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMR1987 and KyKevin

mdluk1

All-Conference
Oct 28, 2007
915
4,189
93
I don’t feel that any of your options are what I would expect. Also, it’d help if you define what a top portal guy is: top 10, top 25, top 50 etc. Almost all of your options are with Stokes. I think we are likely to have a top portal class (LIKE WE DID LAST YEAR) but I do not think Stokes will be a Cat.
Well, I’ll say it again, unless the KNOW that stokes is coming, I’d take the top 3 that I can get NOW.
 

KyKevin

All-Conference
Dec 28, 2021
1,625
2,448
113
expectations are so screwed up. imagine landing 2 top portal players and then adding stokes and its only considered "high-moderate success".


If we landed Stokes this bunch of negative A holes would flip like a switch, and be the Pope pumpers they give other fans s.hit about.
And I would bet a lot of money on that.
 

Tri-Countycat

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,340
2,966
113
If we landed Stokes this bunch of negative A holes would flip like a switch, and be the Pope pumpers they give other fans s.hit about.
And I would bet a lot of money on that.
You do realize that landing Stokes isn’t a recruiting win? It’s a monetary win. Stokes has made it perfectly clear that UK isn’t his preference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: philstat

KyKevin

All-Conference
Dec 28, 2021
1,625
2,448
113
You do realize that landing Stokes isn’t a recruiting win? It’s a monetary win. Stokes has made it perfectly clear that UK isn’t his preference.



No I didn't realize that, I personally wouldn't want him, because of your reasoning. But if he goes to Kansas, who wins then? Pope has a no win situation.

But if Stokes did go to Ky, you do realize others would follow right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JASUN74

Snarks

All-American
Jan 31, 2005
8,439
6,719
93
I think he has limited success, but doesn’t land Stokes. Why do all options include that?

my guess is team is about the same as last year. Mid tier in the SEC, probably loses in the first or second round of the tournament.
 

philstat

All-American
Jan 3, 2004
10,374
8,126
56
How he was unable to sign even one top HS player borders on being surreal, he backed himself into a situation to where he’s 100% reliant on the portal, and only Moreno for returning players is starter material and even he wouldn’t even be a top 25 big, a debacle on all fronts.
 

ukfan#67

Redshirt
Feb 6, 2006
32
30
18
Even if he paid Stokes enough money to come to UK, he wouldn't know how to coach him. His coaching sure doesn't impress anyone. If all he can get is mid major guys to fill out a roster we are in trouble again. I really don't think any good players want to play for this goofball analytical coach. Brace yourself for another mediocre year. Funny how the other programs are starting to land players and we have none. Lost out on all the big name high school prospects. That should tell you something.
 

Genediesel

Junior
Mar 18, 2022
259
267
43
Honestly, these questions are not fair. The results will be misleading and bunk.

Anyone who has studied statistics would tell you that.

Part of going to college is being able to understand how data is presented, the bias of the questions asked, and if the results are valid or not.

It is clear your questions are set up in a way so that you will get the results you wish to receive.

The problem with the questions is that all the "good" results include getting Stokes. Then, you only have one "bad" result, which is not getting Stokes PLUS whiffing on the portal.

Anyone with one intelligent brain cell would be able to understand the way you created this survey is not valid. The results completely rely on whether UK gets Stokes, or not.

It's entirely possible we miss on Stokes, but take all the money reserved for him to dominate in the portal.

Noone knows right now. My faith and trust in Pope is also not great right now. However, I'm not a big enough hater to go on a paid forum, and create a manipulative survey, with the sole purpose of making Pope look bad.
 
Last edited: