What? No, man. That's speculation at best. It worked for Penn State in the early 2010s partially because there was no Penn State. Much has changed. There was parity at NCAAs. Post-grads weren't getting paid a living wage to train in a college room. Stud recruits weren't getting promised that same living wage. Minnesota, Iowa, and OSU traded titles for the past many decades. High school students weren't beating world champions. Every match ever wasn't available with a few clicks. Beating them now requires a different strategy.
Agreed. My idea is that in order to beat a super team you have to build a super team and also wait for the other super team to show some weaknesses. Looking ahead with what we have and have coming our roster looks insane in 2028 and 2029. Could we find a way to keep that going in 2029 as well with this current class? That's all I'm saying. We aren't winning next year. We will get 2nd, 3rd, or 4th probably. We could redshirt some key guys and still get Top-5 and preserve them for 2030. I also don't think they will leave. I believe they all want to wrestle for David Taylor and we have the NIL budget to keep them here. I think our only transfers out will be logjam guys. I am betting my theory on the strength of the freshman class. It's the very best ever. I do not think it will ever be duplicated. To me it presents a unique opportunity.
I know some of the smarter posters here can build out the next four years rosters with the ideal situations that would have us winning 2028-30. Last thing I will say, and bash away, is this is just for fun. Not trying to piss anyone off. I do linger on the shoulda/woulda/coulda too long.
I know very well the inverse of this stupid theory is wrestle the best team every year and it builds and builds and we bust through in 2028 and win and win again in 2029 and because of that we dominate recruiting every year and it snowballs. And we replace Penn State as Kings. I hope that happens and I take all kinds of shig from everyone. The end.