Portal Tracker of UK Targets

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
You’re not defending BCG??? You pretty much fooled everyone in here then.

We don't know what Pope is yet, he did more in 1 year here than BCG did his entire career and the competition was far greater. He might suck, but I can guarantee he doesn't suck as bad as BCG.
I'm not defending Billy G. But I just certainly am crapping on Pope because he's dorky can't recruit can't win and acts like a sissy. We might not of been good when Billy G was here but the entire country wasn't laughing at us. We just had a drunk. Now we have a morman pussc
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mdnerd

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
Like cornbread said. It's cow **** vs horse ****. About the same. Sec is better now. Billy G didn't have 22 million to play with and still signed Patrick Patterson.

Using the SEC is better only takes the argument so far. They both are lower level coaches. Can find many things that are different about then and now but at the end of the day Pope is 9th in the SEC. With no recruits.
Again with the Patterson thing. Tubby had that guy locked up, he handed him to Billy.

Don't forget, he also had Smoove, Crawford and Meeks. He had a hell of a squad and he lost to VMI and Gardner Webb. And he went to the NIT.

Say what you want about Pope, he would have that roster at least in the sweet 16.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cole World

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
I'm not defending Billy G. But I just certainly am crapping on Pope because he's dorky can't recruit can't win and acts like a sissy. We might not of been good when Billy G was here but the entire country wasn't laughing at us. We just had a drunk. Now we have a morman pussc
I won't argue with the stuff about Pope being soft, but that doesn't mean we need to pile on and act like those two years BCG was here, were better. That's just crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anot

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
So just because he signed 1 recruit, that means he's better?
Your standards are sooo much different than mine. I care more about results on the court and when you compare BCG to pretty much anybody, he loses.
Not just because he signed Ppat. That was just an example. Pope has 22 million and can't sign a Ppat. And if results are whats important to you then how in the world are you using Pope as an example?

And as far as saying that's just one recruit...well it' better than zero for the first time in program history right?
 

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
Again with the Patterson thing. Tubby had that guy locked up, he handed him to Billy.

Don't forget, he also had Smoove, Crawford and Meeks. He had a hell of a squad and he lost to VMI and Gardner Webb. And he went to the NIT.

Say what you want about Pope, he would have that roster at least in the sweet 16.
I won't say what I think. I will say Pope just had 22 million to spend and didn't make a sweet 16.
 

JohnRambo82

Senior
Mar 25, 2026
340
518
88
So just because he signed 1 recruit, that means he's better?
Your standards are sooo much different than mine. I care more about results on the court and when you compare BCG to pretty much anybody, he loses.
There was a podcast recently that Jeff Teague was on and he talked about BCG. He said out of the blue that he got a phone call from him when he was getting recruited and BCG told him he wasn’t good enough to play for Kentucky and the guy wasn’t even considering UK and had never spoken to him in his life lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: will1976

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
Not just because he signed Ppat. That was just an example. Pope has 22 million and can't sign a Ppat. And if results are whats important to you then how in the world are you using Pope as an example?

And as far as saying that's just one recruit...well it' better than zero for the first time in program history right?
Who am I supposed to use as an example? The comparison is between BCG and Pope. Pope's results are a thousand miles better than BCG's.

I'm still waiting in you to give me these great results that BCG churned out that put him over Pope.
 

JohnRambo82

Senior
Mar 25, 2026
340
518
88
Not just because he signed Ppat. That was just an example. Pope has 22 million and can't sign a Ppat. And if results are whats important to you then how in the world are you using Pope as an example?

And as far as saying that's just one recruit...well it' better than zero for the first time in program history right?
I’m one of those guys that will be ready for a new coach if this coming season isn’t a hell of a lot better. I’m just saying we’re not at BCG level bad right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1 and anot

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
Who am I supposed to use as an example? The comparison is between BCG and Pope. Pope's results are a thousand miles better than BCG's.

I'm still waiting in you to give me these great results that BCG churned out that put him over Pope.
Keep waiting because I'm not going back 20 years to research cow crap vs horse crap. We both know they both stink. If Pope finished 9th and Billy G finished 8th it's impossible for the results to be miles apart.

But I did forget we turned into a program that celebrates getting blown out by Tennessee in the sweet sixteen. Popes results are better. Barely.

It seems like you are discussing Cal and Billy G. Not Pope and Billy G.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
I won't say what I think. I will say Pope just had 22 million to spend and didn't make a sweet 16.
Okay and BCG had Meeks, PP, Ramel and Crawford, he went to the NIT. How?

I get it, you hate Pope, but you lose when you try to argue the BCG era was better. That was a horrible 2 years.

Pope lost this team, that is obvious to me. It was poorly built and there was a riff. Plus, he lost his pg. But even through all of that and against a much tougher schedule, he didn't go to the NIT, Billy did and you're defending Billy. That's crazy to me.

But, why are you only focusing on the 25/26 season, why won't you discuss 24/25?
 

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
I’m one of those guys that will be ready for a new coach if this coming season isn’t a hell of a lot better. I’m just saying we’re not at BCG level bad right now.
From a factual standpoint. How many games better is Pope? I guess I can go look it up real quick but I'm pretty sure it was like a 3 game difference.

But that's somehow light years better because 20 years later the SEC is better?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kyjeff1

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
Keep waiting because I'm not going back 20 years to research cow crap vs horse crap. We both know they both stink. If Pope finished 9th and Billy G finished 8th it's impossible for the results to be miles apart.

But I did forget we turned into a program that celebrates getting blown out by Tennessee in the sweet sixteen. Popes results are better. Barely.

It seems like you are discussing Cal and Billy G. Not Pope and Billy G.
Wait, you said the BCG era was better and you don't even have the facts from those years? You cant come up with anything to back your claim except he landed PP?

So really, all this is, is you piling on Pope and pouring salt in his wounds. Just say that, because trying to argue for BCG, is so much worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anot

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
Okay and BCG had Meeks, PP, Ramel and Crawford, he went to the NIT. How?

I get it, you hate Pope, but you lose when you try to argue the BCG era was better. That was a horrible 2 years.

Pope lost this team, that is obvious to me. It was poorly built and there was a riff. Plus, he lost his pg. But even through all of that and against a much tougher schedule, he didn't go to the NIT, Billy did and you're defending Billy. That's crazy to me.

Bit, why are you only focusing on the 25/26 season, why won't you discuss 24/25?
24/25 Popes first season was a overachieving season because we got blew out in the sweet 16 by Tennessee. I've already mentioned the Duke game was fun. Coming back against Gonazaga was fun. That's where the fun ended
 

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
Wait, you said the BCG era was better and you don't even have the facts from those years? You cant come up with anything to back your claim except he landed PP?
I don't have facts from last year. I'm speaking on what I watched. I watched it 20 years ago and I watched us have a historically low season this year. What facts do you want man.
 

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
Okay and BCG had Meeks, PP, Ramel and Crawford, he went to the NIT. How?

I get it, you hate Pope, but you lose when you try to argue the BCG era was better. That was a horrible 2 years.

Pope lost this team, that is obvious to me. It was poorly built and there was a riff. Plus, he lost his pg. But even through all of that and against a much tougher schedule, he didn't go to the NIT, Billy did and you're defending Billy. That's crazy to me.

But, why are you only focusing on the 25/26 season, why won't you discuss 24/25?
If we want to do that then does cal get to one of his final fours without Jorts? One of Billy's players.
 

JohnRambo82

Senior
Mar 25, 2026
340
518
88
From a factual standpoint. How many games better is Pope? I guess I can go look it up real quick but I'm pretty sure it was like a 3 game difference.

But that's somehow light years better because 20 years later the SEC is better?
BCG was a terrible guy and coach. Other than what I told you and Jeff has, I got a good question for you. You ever see a coach make a player block a free throw in a ball game before??? I have once in my life, and it was BCG that did it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1 and anot

will1976

All-Conference
Dec 10, 2003
3,314
2,646
113
How did this useful post devolve into a Billy G argument? Im too lazy to scroll. 😅
 

Attachments

  • images.jpeg
    images.jpeg
    33.6 KB · Views: 1
  • Love
Reactions: anot

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
BCG was a terrible guy and coach. Other than what I told you and Jeff has, I got a good question for you. You ever see a coach make a player block a free throw in a ball game before??? I have once in my life, and it was BCG that did it.
And a coach to do something that crazy is only a few games worse than Pope. Billy G was terrible and Pope is terrible. My original statement was pretty much saying at least Billy G wasn't a biyatch.

He always said what he said. Wasn't always word fumbling and word salad twiddling his fingers because he's clueless.they both shouldn't be a part of UK history as far as head coaching goes.
 

anot

Junior
Mar 27, 2026
192
263
63
How did this useful post devolve into a Billy G argument? Im too lazy to scroll. 😅
Will Pope ever leave us with any legendary stuff like a mugshot at least? Was beating Duke with the oldest team in college history against one of the youngest teams in history when their starting center was out most of the second half be his high point?

Could he even sign a player from high point?
 

JohnRambo82

Senior
Mar 25, 2026
340
518
88
And a coach to do something that crazy is only a few games worse than Pope. Billy G was terrible and Pope is terrible. My original statement was pretty much saying at least Billy G wasn't a biyatch.

He always said what he said. Wasn't always word fumbling and word salad twiddling his fingers because he's clueless.they both shouldn't be a part of UK history as far as head coaching goes.
Popes on thin ice. He’s gotta kill it in this portal and upgrade the talent or he’s going to get fired next season no way around that
 
  • Like
Reactions: anot

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
I don't have facts from last year. I'm speaking on what I watched. I watched it 20 years ago and I watched us have a historically low season this year. What facts do you want man.
This wasn't a historically low season.

But if you think it was historically bad, BCG's 2 years were far worse, so his are historically worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anot

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
BCG was a terrible guy and coach. Other than what I told you and Jeff has, I got a good question for you. You ever see a coach make a player block a free throw in a ball game before??? I have once in my life, and it was BCG that did it.
I played volleyball with Perry Stevenson 3 or 4 years ago, I asked him about that. He just said "when a coach directs me to do something, I do it". He wouldn't say a bad word about BCG, or anybody for that matter.
 

#1 cat fan

Sophomore
May 7, 2009
185
169
43
H
Honestly, if that's the list, I don't understand a couple of those being high/top priority. Pope's offense clearly is at its best with good perimeter shooters at every position.

Neither SG Byrd, SF Haralson or PF James are good perimeter threats. So, if you get one of those, the other 2 don't need to be on the floor with him.

I mentioned it in another thread, but for the PF, I would target SDSU Magoon Gwath... he's 6'11-7'0ish, and he shoots 40% from 3pt range. He could absolutely play as the primary PF and even backup the C in spots.
Harelson may be the best player in the portal. He's a stud. 3 point shooting isn't everything and I'm glad to see pope looking for attacking scorers
 

#1 cat fan

Sophomore
May 7, 2009
185
169
43
Zoom call with Paulius Murauskas Thursday only big name I've seen the rest are

Season 2 Reaction GIF by Parks and Recreation
Go watch Harelson mid season highlights video. Stud all American and 16 per as a freshman. More athletic pj Washington
 

Mdnerd

All-American
Apr 20, 2022
1,912
5,792
113
I'm not defending Billy G. But I just certainly am crapping on Pope because he's dorky can't recruit can't win and acts like a sissy. We might not of been good when Billy G was here but the entire country wasn't laughing at us. We just had a drunk. Now we have a morman pussc
Yup, still one of the absolute worst posters here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anot

Tri-Countycat

All-Conference
Jul 1, 2025
1,297
2,789
113
It doesn’t really matter who we get. If we get top players, they won’t fit Popes “system” and if we get players to fit “Popes” system, they won’t be top players. Wash and repeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kywildcat1021979

UKSanders

Senior
Aug 27, 2007
293
554
93
H

Harelson may be the best player in the portal. He's a stud. 3 point shooting isn't everything and I'm glad to see pope looking for attacking scorers

that's a fair point, and thanks for confirming what I was curious about when I said "if you get one, you need to make sure other targets are shooters".


I've noticed more of the targets so far appear to not way above avg or elite perimeter shooters, but there appear to be more guys that can attack off the dribble...that does give me hope that Pope learned a valuable lesson this year. No matter the offense and movement with screens, the more guys who can attack off the bounce make the ball move better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

Mossip

All-American
Jul 20, 2007
5,919
5,394
60
Say what you want about Pope, he would have that roster at least in the sweet 16.
You’re mostly right in this entirely pointless argument, but settle down with this shlt. Pope has 3 tournament wins and he had zero when we hired him. He’s not a lock for anything in the post season.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,544
70,758
113
You’re mostly right in this entirely pointless argument, but settle down with this shlt. Pope has 3 tournament wins and he had zero when we hired him. He’s not a lock for anything in the post season.
Why? The SEC was incredibly weak in 2007 and 2008 and Pope literally just took a less talented team to the sweet 16. He got a 3 seed while playing in the toughest league ever recorded.

That 08/09 team had:
Meeks
Patterson
Liggins
Miller
Ramon Harris
Jorts
Aj Stewart
Perry Stevenson

The 07/08 team had Crawford and Ramel added to most of those.

Those are easily sweet 16 teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cole World