Fall, Nwuli and Badalau are all in the portal . . . .

lion1983

All-Conference
Apr 24, 2024
1,253
2,519
113
Interesting, since the portal is not actually officially open. Though they could have announced it on their own.
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,700
19,754
61
Good thing we didn't have Badalau and Fall locked into multi year contracts like some people claim they want.
I wouldn’t cry over them having multi year contracts.

They’re both bench pieces who would be bench pieces next year as well.

Unless we are spending like idiots, guys like that should have zero impact on our self imposed salary cap.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,071
15,451
72
Good thing we didn't have Badalau and Fall locked into multi year contracts like some people claim they want.
Not sure if serious, but I think there would still be 1-year deals, and for 2-year deals there would be a buyout clause if a team wants to end the deal after one year.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,096
12,435
78
Anybody on this roster can be replaced with someone at least as good for the same money. The fact that we look at him as a key player tells you all you need to know about this roster.
I don’t think you have a realistic picture of how little experience 1M is going to get us in the portal. To get an experienced higher level player there’s a pretty good chance we’re shelling out 2M, unfortunately. Neither you nor anyone else have any basis for assuming another low major kid from an NJIT type school is going to come in and be better than Tariq or any of the others we have because when you recruit low major it’s a crap shoot. You don’t really know when you recruit mid tier A-10 kids either. There is a big difference in competition level. A proven high major kid is going to cost us a lot of money. We need to pay it for a center and a PF. We probably can’t afford to do so elsewhere.
 

NewHondo77

Freshman
Jul 8, 2025
76
55
18
I don’t think you have a realistic picture of how little experience 1M is going to get us in the portal. To get an experienced higher level player there’s a pretty good chance we’re shelling out 2M, unfortunately. Neither you nor anyone else have any basis for assuming another low major kid from an NJIT type school is going to come in and be better than Tariq or any of the others we have because when you recruit low major it’s a crap shoot. You don’t really know when you recruit mid tier A-10 kids either. There is a big difference in competition level. A proven high major kid is going to cost us a lot of money. We need to pay it for a center and a PF. We probably can’t afford to do so elsewhere.
Good. Then the best you can ever expect is mediocrity.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,096
12,435
78
Good. Then the best you can ever expect is mediocrity.

No, not “forever” just next season. Realistically, Pike can’t turn over an entire roster in one season and have any shot at being competitive. What SHU did would be an absolutely ceiling (that’s with hitting on every mid-major hauled in), Pike doing a much better job figuring out roster rotations early and managing a collection of new comers better than ever before - AND even still doesn’t translate into even bubble consideration with a BIG schedule.

When you get a new coach, sure, you wipe the slate clean and that coach knows he’s not gone if he doesn’t make the NCAAs year one. It’s different. No tourney and Pike is gone. I’m sure he knows it. Pike, as a standing, struggling coach would have a very hard time attracting a brand new roster of up and comers in the first place (a new coach can try to sell a vision for change). And there’d be a much lower one year probability of him getting to the tourney so there’s no way he would choose this strategy. Of course - it’s TBD who he convinces to stay on and how he manages the portal to build around them. The goal is NCAAs though for next season - not a NATTY.