Mo to portal

Jul 6, 2025
186
345
63
For what we need he is overmatched. God awful ugly shot. Be good for a midmajor team maybe but he’s not an NBA player. He did work his *** off when in the game so gotta give him props for that. Just not talented enough. It happens. Best of luck.
 

Smeegs

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2025
520
1,415
93
Unfortunately he’s also only (possibly generously) 6’7 and doesn’t have any perimeter skills, which significantly limits his ceiling.
Yeah, I think that 6’7” listing is being generous. As someone else noted, he actually looks closer to 6’5” when he stands next to other bigs. Other PFs just tower over him.

But he scrapped inside as well as anyone we had. I wish our taller bigs had his rebounding and defensive instincts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFCat11

BlueBloodKyFan73

All-Conference
Oct 29, 2010
3,827
4,748
113
No I know the answer. I asked because I never said anything about his outside shot. So I have no idea why you even commented on it. Did you even read what I wrote? lol
I read it that’s why I said not knocking on what you said, agreeing with you more because of how limited he was mid range. He put up roughly same numbers here as Alabama but with more minutes and worse shooting numbers here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farsight Clone

UKBB4Ever

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
1,756
3,056
113
Just one of many not properly coached or used. Same player going out the door as the one that came in.

He did play hard and wasn't a quitter like some of the others.
 

BlueBloodKyFan73

All-Conference
Oct 29, 2010
3,827
4,748
113
Yeah, I think that 6’7” listing is being generous. As someone else noted, he actually looks closer to 6’5” when he stands next to other bigs. Other PFs just tower over him.

But he scrapped inside as well as anyone we had. I wish our taller bigs had his rebounding and defensive instincts.

Need more motion stories like the one dude from Whisky. That’s what we want to start hearing. Sure that will pick up with the portal opening but there are teams already eyeing dudes that they know are going in.
I’m sure our staff is contacting agents but some probably already know where they want to go
 

Atrain7732

All-American
Dec 11, 2009
3,798
7,077
65
Don’t dislike the kid but perfectly fine with him leaving as well. Had a good motor but terrible shot. Came on better at the end of the year, but was essentially a role player most of the season. Not gonna be upset when a role player who wants to be a starter leaves. If we can’t find a replacement for him, we are in bigger trouble than we realize.
 

Catlogic1552

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
441
1,038
93
He doesn't fit Pope's system but he's has a motor. If Pope used him correctly instead of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, we could of gotten a lot more from Mo D.

I have said through out the entire year, he's a poor man's Dennis Rodman. He gets his points near the rim and at the free throw line. He's a clean up guy around the rim.

If he could have worked on his dribbling and driving the ball, he would have been a great asset.

Again, if you don't have system guys you have to figure out how they best can work when used.

Do you think Dan Hurley would have figured out and leveraged Mo D's strengths? Yes. Why, because he's a good coach.
Again. “The System”. A mythical creature in which we never seem to have anyone that “fits”,.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farsight Clone

Madhuvan

Junior
Aug 11, 2024
146
323
63
there was no way you can run it back with moreno/garrison at the center and jelavic/mo d at PF. hope this means jelavic stays, i like his upside and fits the stretch 4 we need but he needs to actually hit shots. lessen the burden on getting portal guys.
The frustrating thing is that Jelly’s shot looks really good. Mechanically sound as far as I can see. But they don’t go in. I could see that changing though. I still like his upside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HipTer and TFCat11

BigBluefoot

All-American
Jul 4, 2025
1,550
6,302
113
but you dont win with freshman.....

toxic fans talking out of both sides of their mouths.
"Toxic fans," I see the barnhart waterboys have their new imbecilic talking point to attack the fans with.
Sad Men GIF by BabylonBee
 

MdWIldcat55

Heisman
Dec 9, 2007
21,273
84,864
113
I really liked Mo. But here is how I feel about it:

* He made some big plays to help Kentucky beat Santa Clara, a #10 seed.
* Kentucky needs players who can make big plays to help them beat a #2 seed. Nothing in his game - or virtually anyone else on the team aside from maybe Oweh -- suggested he was that guy.
 

UKBB4Ever

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
1,756
3,056
113
I really liked Mo. But here is how I feel about it:

* He made some big plays to help Kentucky beat Santa Clara, a #10 seed.
* Kentucky needs players who can make big plays to help them beat a #2 seed. Nothing in his game - or virtually anyone else on the team aside from maybe Oweh -- suggested he was that guy.
This is good for UK if he's replaced by a better player.
 

Catphright23

Senior
Dec 6, 2023
255
519
93
Just one of many not properly coached or used. Same player going out the door as the one that came in.

He did play hard and wasn't a quitter like some of the others.
Lol that's funny. How would you use him? He averaged less at Alabama and shot threes better but they had a pg. He is hustle but part of our chemistry problems imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaBlue05

Padsfs07

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2013
3,566
3,266
108
Again. “The System”. A mythical creature in which we never seem to have anyone that “fits”,.


I think last years' starters are what you would look for in a Mark Pope system.

Defense/passing-oriented PG that you can't back off (Butler)
Elite 3pt shooting out of the SG (Brea/Robinson)
Defense/slashing ability, can shoot SF (Oweh/Robinson)
Stretch 4 PF (Carr)
Good defense & passing out of the C, ability to score in paint (Williams)

I think that team with a healthy Butler, Robinson, and Carr would have been really good, but they were a little less talented than needed for a championship contender. This past years' team didn't fit at all except for Oweh.

So comparing that to the 26/27 roster and we have:
Chandler fits if he can find more consistency at the 2 and Kam Williams sort of fits at the 3. Moreno is good, but doesn't have some of these characteristics at the 5 that I think fits. So you have to make up for these deficiencies with the backups and with other positions, or get these guys to accept being backups themselves.
 

Rainmaker

All-Conference
May 13, 2015
1,031
2,440
113
I wonder if Pope tried to get him to stay, would say a lot in of itself.
Mod wanted 3 million and we said no. So he thinks he can get it on the open market. I’m not seeing him getting anywhere near that but to each their own. These NIL agents are killing some of these guys. Guarantee half of these power 4 guys leaving end up making less wherever they go.
 
Last edited:

WallMash

All-Conference
Oct 30, 2009
4,526
2,804
103
I think in pro day, Oscar was closer to 6'7. Mo had longer arms, arms of a 7 footer. He coulda done it more, IMO
 

ftp000

All-American
Mar 26, 2009
5,923
5,302
113
I hate to see a player with that much heart leave. But other than few bigs, we need a roster full of 35% plus from 3 shooters. That's what's needed if Pope plans to play his style next season.
 

MichaelGray

All-Conference
Jan 13, 2026
727
1,023
93
Same. You win games with guys like gim but he cant be a centerpiece.

Unfortunately im sure we paid him like a centerpiece and understandably he doesn't want to voluntarily take a deel cut to stay.

As I said in the BG thread, Pope absolutely must get this money under control. Last year he overpaid everyone, which makes retention harder now there is apparently less basketball nil money.
He has Keegan Brown for that, balancing the money for talent value, this next team will be able to shoot, I can say that without even knowing, Pope wants to run his offense & that requires shooting. He also wants creators from the PG position, he knows this is the year he has to prove it. What happens on the defensive end is what I'm worried about more than anything. The next few weeks will be interesting.
 
Last edited:
May 30, 2008
530
698
93
He doesn't fit Pope's system but he's has a motor. If Pope used him correctly instead of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, we could of gotten a lot more from Mo D.

I have said through out the entire year, he's a poor man's Dennis Rodman. He gets his points near the rim and at the free throw line. He's a clean up guy around the rim.

If he could have worked on his dribbling and driving the ball, he would have been a great asset.

Again, if you don't have system guys you have to figure out how they best can work when used.

Do you think Dan Hurley would have figured out and leveraged Mo D's strengths? Yes. Why, because he's a good coach.
Let Hurley lose 3 starters and see how good a coach he is…
 

HipTer

Senior
Apr 11, 2012
975
674
93
The frustrating thing is that Jelly’s shot looks really good. Mechanically sound as far as I can see. But they don’t go in. I could see that changing though. I still like his upside.
I agree, and the same thing with his FTs. I'm not a shot doctor, but do you think maybe its a follow through issue?
 
Jul 6, 2025
2,149
6,470
113
He has Keegan Brown for that, balancing the money for talent value, this next team will be able to shoot, I can say that without even knowing, Pope wants to run his offense & that requires shooting. He also wants creators from the PG position, he knows this is the year he has to prove it. What happens on the defensive end is what I'm worried about more than anything. The next few weeks will be interesting.

Ya like Mark Fox handled it before. Ill reserve judgement till i see results.