Toggle sidebar

Trump and Hegseth get slapped down yet again.

M

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,944
3,315
113
DailyBuck7 said:
He is mentally ill. I could go on with many more stories. His latest lie is really a doozy.
Click to expand...

I've never had a wife who was so unhappy with me and her life that she tried to commit crimes so she'd get arrested and deported, so she could go back home.

I've never had a young kid that I shipped overseas for a year to live with people I didn't know because my wife and I were too busy working to be bothered parenting.

I've never had a second wife (mail order, trying to get her citizenship) who was so unhappy with me, she smeared human feces all over my walls before she tried to flee, trying to make sure I couldn't find her, while taking her kid with her ... but then I tracked her down and found the kid.

I've been married once ... still am ... and with the same person for nearly 30 years ... with 2 great kids I've never felt the need to ship overseas to people I didn't know for over a year because, in my estimation, I was too busy working to parent them.

If I'm mentally ill, you're catatonic.

If these are the stories you saw fit to share with the board ... imagine what else there is to discover.
 
D

DailyBuck7

Redshirt
Mar 4, 2026
37
27
18
Moogy said:
I've never had a second wife (mail order, trying to get her citizenship) who was so unhappy with me, she smeared human feces all over my walls before she tried to flee, trying to make sure I couldn't find her, while taking her kid with her ... but then I tracked her down and found the kid.
Click to expand...
My second wife was a Chinese doctor who worked at the 3rd most prestigious hospital in Beijing and who I met online. You not respecting women and making up sh*t call her mail order. When I divorced her I decided to add major updates to my first home (moving to a second home in better school district) and she went into the home when no workers were there and no one else was there and did spread feces to show how angry she was. (We were in the process of a divorce and had been separated about 1 yr) She was not unhappy with me before I filed divorce papers but was very angry and lost face when I filed for divorce. I was very happy to divorce her and it would be preposterous to claim that I would ever look for her. (She was working in New Mexico most of this time. ). Also her daughter and my daughter seriously didn't get along and the idea that I would look for her daughter is equally laughable and preposterous. Just like you took a small smidgen of truth and turned it into a major low life lie above you have done the same with the rest of your claims that I am not responding to here. Go ahead and make up more sh*t and continue the shameless lies. I will not respond any more because you will just lie some more and I will be continuously disproving your lies and wasting everyone's time here.

You might want to consider taking some medication to deal with your illness.
 
Last edited:
LafayetteBear

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,123
8,422
113
JohnHughsPartner said:
“The simple truth is, you were wrong to insult and try to correct LafayetteBear”

😂😂😂😂😂

There’s no way you freaks aren’t in some weird cult. Hate to break it you, SimplyComplcated12, but Lafayettebear is of age and he’s fat, so I’m guessing he’s probably not the one for you
Click to expand...
JinxyPat: You know nothing about me, my background, my appearance, my sexual orientation, or how I spend my time when I am not here posting. What you DO know about me is my political viewpoint. And I know yours. I'm content to live with mine, and have no qualms about it. You, on the other hand, seem to be very unhappy with your lot in life, and unduly preoccupied with attacking people who disagree with your (to be charitable) unique perspective. Perhaps you should consult with psychiatrist. Maybe he or she can prescribe medication, shock therapy, or some other treatment that will help you with your affliction.
 
LafayetteBear

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,123
8,422
113
DailyBuck7 said:
My second wife was a Chinese doctor who worked at the 3rd most prestigious hospital in Beijing and who I met online. You not respecting women and making up sh*t call her mail order. When I divorced her I decided to add major updates to my first home (moving to a second home in better school district) and she went into the home when no workers were there and no one else was there and did spread feces to show how angry she was. (We were in the process of a divorce and had been separated about 1 yr) She was not unhappy with me before I filed divorce papers but was very angry and lost face when I filed for divorce. I was very happy to divorce her and it would be preposterous to claim that I would ever look for her. (She was working in New Mexico most of this time. ). Also her daughter and my daughter seriously didn't get along and the idea that I would look for her daughter is equally laughable and preposterous. Just like you took a small smidgen of truth and turned it into a major low life lie above you have done the same with the rest of your claims that I am not responding to here. Go ahead and make up more sh*t and continue the shameless lies. I will not respond any more because you will just lie some more and I will be continuously disproving your lies and wasting everyone's time here.

You might want to consider taking some medication to deal with your illness.
Click to expand...
Buck: This whole back and forth reprises a similar back and forth that occurred on the PSU Test Board. Do we really need to do it all over again here on the Clemson politics board? You are obviously not responsible for all of this (it takes two to tango), but it surely illustrates why putting a bunch of your personal information out on a political chat board might not be the wisest strategy.
 
D

DailyBuck7

Redshirt
Mar 4, 2026
37
27
18
LafayetteBear said:
Buck: This whole back and forth reprises a similar back and forth that occurred on the PSU Test Board. Do we really need to do it all over again here on the Clemson politics board? You are obviously not responsible for all of this (it takes two to tango), but it surely illustrates why putting a bunch of your personal information out on a political chat board might not be the wisest strategy.
Click to expand...
I said I am done with it. Unless I responded to his unbelievable lies and made a record of them people would believe there was some truth to them. I could have exposed much more but I realize that most people have no interest in this. I won't be responding to this stuff anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
M

Moogy

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2017
4,944
3,315
113
DailyBuck7 said:
I said I am done with it. Unless I responded to his unbelievable lies and made a record of them people would believe there was some truth to them. I could have exposed much more but I realize that most people have no interest in this. I won't be responding to this stuff anymore.
Click to expand...
Nothing I posted was a lie. It’s all stuff you actually shared with the board. Just because you don’t like the way I characterize it doesn’t mean I’m lying … because I’m not. You’re a weird arse dude who overshares … especially when it’s not necessary. And you’ve led a completely messed up life that’s almost unbelievable, it’s that crazed. But, according to you, it’s true. All this simply because you wanted to talk crap to Bear and got yourself in trouble, looking like a desperate fool.
 
JohnHughsPartner

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
3,885
6,197
113
LafayetteBear said:
JinxyPat: You know nothing about me, my background, my appearance, my sexual orientation, or how I spend my time when I am not here posting. What you DO know about me is my political viewpoint. And I know yours. I'm content to live with mine, and have no qualms about it. You, on the other hand, seem to be very unhappy with your lot in life, and unduly preoccupied with attacking people who disagree with your (to be charitable) unique perspective. Perhaps you should consult with psychiatrist. Maybe he or she can prescribe medication, shock therapy, or some other treatment that will help you with your affliction.
Click to expand...
All this just sounds liike you’re really, really fat. Do better
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Hotshoe
D

DailyBuck7

Redshirt
Mar 4, 2026
37
27
18
LafayetteBear said:
Sigh ...

Congratulations to you for your "big words." Stare decisis (Latin for "the decision stands") is indeed a short hand way of expressing the principle that courts should follow case law precedent. It is "binding" precedent when the prior court opinion is from a higher court within the same state, circuit or (in the case of the U.S. Supreme Court) country. Otherwise, it is "persuasive authority" (i.e., non-binding precedent).

One thing you overlooked, however, is that a prior court opinion has precedential value only to the extent that the facts of the prior case are similar to those of the case under consideration. If a case has very similar (verging on the same) set of facts, it is said to be "on all fours with" the case under consideration.

You cited Dred Scott v. Sanford as form of precedent for the birthright citizenship case currently pending in the U.S. Supreme Court, noting (correctly) that its holding (that black slaves were not U.S. citizens even though born in this country) gave impetus to the adoption of the 14th Amendment. But, unfortunately for you, nothing in the 14th Amendment states that its effect is limited to former slaves. Its phraseology is far more general than that.

If you wanted to cite a case which is much closer to being on all fours with the current birthright citizenship case, you would have cited the U.S. Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898), in which the Court held that birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment for children born in the U.S. to foreign-born parents, upholding jus soli (citizenship by birth). This ruling confirmed that nearly all children born on U.S. soil are citizens, regardless of their parents' status. THAT is the case that the current Supreme Court will need to either overrule or somehow distinguish if it decides to limit birthright citizenship.
Click to expand...
Fair basic response to what was before the Supreme Court, realizing this is a message board that is designed for short responses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom