So how do we have more revenue than Rutgers? And UCLA (maybe lower revenue share for a period)? Even Indiana? Heck we are only a couple mill less than IL.I’ve wondered how much each college football program would be valued at, similar to how professional teams are.
WSJ’s article gives a nice overview, but this is obviously open to wide interpretation:
View attachment 1173784
Based on the discussion on the basketball board, it sounds like we're saving a bunch of money skimping on the jalapenos for the nachos.So how do we have more revenue than Rutgers? And UCLA (maybe lower revenue share for a period)? Even Indiana? Heck we are only a couple mill less than IL.
Most of the revenue is share of Big Ten media rights. A few blue chips have huge fan bases and the additional support that comes with them. The remaining plebeians are living off conference revenue. RU and UCLA are not yet drawing full shares.So how do we have more revenue than Rutgers? And UCLA (maybe lower revenue share for a period)? Even Indiana? Heck we are only a couple mill less than IL.
I’m shocked no one else has stated the obvious:Most of the revenue is share of Big Ten media rights. A few blue chips have huge fan bases and the additional support that comes with them. The remaining plebeians are living off conference revenue. RU and UCLA are not yet drawing full shares.
Because some bot wrote the article probably lol. The WSJ is low key trash these days.I’m shocked no one else has stated the obvious:
Pat Ryan is gifting NU an $800M football stadium.
How is our valuation not inclusive of that??
Rutgers and UCLA are insanely broke. Rutgers has shockingly low revenue.So how do we have more revenue than Rutgers? And UCLA (maybe lower revenue share for a period)? Even Indiana? Heck we are only a couple mill less than IL.
Good question - I haven't read the article, but are the capital assets part of the "valuation"?I’m shocked no one else has stated the obvious:
Pat Ryan is gifting NU an $800M football stadium.
How is our valuation not inclusive of that??
Me neither.Good question - I haven't read the article, but are the capital assets part of the "valuation"?