Hector we have a problem: RU grad sues school over sports spending

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,182
176,827
113


The suit, filed Tuesday in Middlesex County Superior Court by attorney Hector Rodriguez, is seeking to “halt the ongoing waste and unlawful diversion of public funds” to the athletics department, which reported a record $78 million deficit for the 2024-25 academic year.




Rodriguez, a class of 1975 Rutgers alum who was once a judge in Franklin Township, argues in the filing that the $516 million deficit Rutgers has accrued since joining the Big Ten in 2014 “constitutes a systemic misuse of public resources undertaken without meaningful oversight, without legislative authorization, and without a credible plan for fiscal sustainability.”



Seeking a trial by jury, Rodriguez requests that the court declare that the school’s “continued subsidization of athletics deficits with public funds violates New Jersey law” and orders “an independent financial audit of Rutgers athletics.” He also seeks to prevent Rutgers “from approving or funding athletic deficits using taxpayer-supported funds without legislative authorization” and demands that Rutgers “make restitution to the State of New Jersey for all amounts deemed to have been improperly used.”
 

OntheBanks

All-Conference
Jul 26, 2001
13,181
4,530
113
Hector, how much taxpayer money is used to support the athletic programs in other states which have many more state universities, like Ohio, Michigan, Florida, California, even the SUNY Schools in NY State?
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,565
86,582
113


The suit, filed Tuesday in Middlesex County Superior Court by attorney Hector Rodriguez, is seeking to “halt the ongoing waste and unlawful diversion of public funds” to the athletics department, which reported a record $78 million deficit for the 2024-25 academic year.




Rodriguez, a class of 1975 Rutgers alum who was once a judge in Franklin Township, argues in the filing that the $516 million deficit Rutgers has accrued since joining the Big Ten in 2014 “constitutes a systemic misuse of public resources undertaken without meaningful oversight, without legislative authorization, and without a credible plan for fiscal sustainability.”



Seeking a trial by jury, Rodriguez requests that the court declare that the school’s “continued subsidization of athletics deficits with public funds violates New Jersey law” and orders “an independent financial audit of Rutgers athletics.” He also seeks to prevent Rutgers “from approving or funding athletic deficits using taxpayer-supported funds without legislative authorization” and demands that Rutgers “make restitution to the State of New Jersey for all amounts deemed to have been improperly used.”
Don't link to NJ.com. Did not see your post. What you missed:

Of course there is a NJ.com story on this, which I will not link. He was reprimanded by the NJ Supreme Court for making a suggestive comment to a female defendant.



Link to complaint below.

 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse

RUPete90

Senior
Jul 3, 2025
523
740
93
If the newspaper report is correct, then it is hard to see any purpose to this lawsuit other than to attract attention to the plaintiff's cause.
Yeah, it's all performative. But he may be one of these PITAs that sticks around pulling these stunts periodically to draw attention to his cause. Could be a new Dowling unfortunately.
 

Retired711

Heisman
Nov 20, 2001
19,971
10,149
58
Yeah, it's all performative. But he may be one of these PITAs that sticks around pulling these stunts periodically to draw attention to his cause. Could be a new Dowling unfortunately.
What he is hoping is to get to the "discovery" stage in which he can force the university to disclose embarrassing documents and to produce witnesses for depositions in which he can try to get embarrassing answers out of them. But that would require the lawsuit to survive a motion to dismiss for (as lawyers put it) failure to state a claim. The motion would say, in effect, "he and his class are not entitled to damages for gross negligence even if he could prove every fact he is alleging." That motion would likely be granted: a suit for damages for gross negligence is successful only if the plaintiff can prove some kind of personal injury (e.g., being hit by a car). It's not a way to get a court to rule on whether a certain use of governmental funds makes sense. Like you say, it's performative.
 
Last edited:

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,006
12,811
113
Rutgers should call his bluff.
Make it public knowledge just how little the state supports Rutgers and further Rutgers Athletics.

"Judgement for the plaintiff in the amount of $0.07. This amounts to your share of NJ public support for Rutgers Atheltics."
 

bigmatt718

Heisman
Mar 11, 2013
15,688
22,017
113
Rutgers should call his bluff.
Make it public knowledge just how little the state supports Rutgers and further Rutgers Athletics.

"Judgement for the plaintiff in the amount of $0.07. This amounts to your share of NJ public support for Rutgers Atheltics."
Would result in a net loss of about $800 after legal fees are accumulated. Might actually be pretty funny if they did that.
 

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
37,296
58,589
113
If the newspaper report is correct, then it is hard to see any purpose to this lawsuit other than to attract attention to the plaintiff's cause.
There's our board lawyer chiming in. So, in your opinion this is a frivolous lawsuit? Or whatever legal mumbo jumbo you lawyer dudes use.
 

Eagleton95.99

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
7,551
6,469
113
I would support this law suit if they just changed the target from the Athletics Department to the Human Resources Department. Year after year the HR Department sucks up valuable resources with no discernible value added, no revenue, and no plan for fiscal self sustainability.