Projected Depth of B1G and SEC for 2026

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,565
86,582
113
😬 Based on ESPN article/analysis. SP+ is a tempo- and opponent-adjusted measure of college football efficiency. It is a predictive measure of the most sustainable and predictable aspects of football, not a résumé ranking. Along those same lines, these projections aren't intended to be a guess at what the AP Top 25 will look like at the end of the season. These are simply early offseason power rankings based on the information we have been able to gather.

Preseason projections on four primary factors, weighted by their predictiveness:

1. Returning production. The returning production numbers are based on rosters I have updated as much as possible to account for transfers and attrition. Combine last year's SP+ ratings and adjustments based on current returning production numbers, and you're pretty far down the projections road.

2. Recent history. Using a chunk of information from previous seasons gives us a good measure of overall program health, even in this era of wild swings in quality. It still stands to reason that a team that has played well for only one year is less likely to duplicate that effort than a team that has been good -- and has likely spent bigger on its roster -- for years on end (and vice versa).

3. Recent recruiting. This piece informs us of the caliber of a team's potential replacements (and/or new stars) in the lineup. It is determined by both the past few years of recruiting rankings and the quality of incoming transfers, though as you might have predicted while watching Indiana surge to the national title last season, this doesn't carry nearly the weight that it once did. A decade or so ago, this piece made up about 20-25% of the preseason formula. Now it's about 1-2%. That's pretty incredible, isn't it?

4. Coaching change effects.








 

mosito

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2006
1,695
1,031
113
Top 8 teams as slightly stronger than the SEC.

I think if Oregon can win the National Championship.... With four years in a row, 4 different teams it might bump the top 12 teams in the B10 higher than then SEC within 2 years.

3 years ago it was probably only Ohio State with 2 SEC teams top 3 followed by 4-5 SEC teams. Two B10 , 6 SEC, ND and an ACC was the usual Top 10.

With SEC doing 9 conference games, that extra loss with result in more turmoil, coach changes, player movement.. I wouldn't be surprised that another Natty Bumps the B10, just as they start negotiating the Next B10 contract in 18-24 months from now.
 

ru109

All-American
Sep 18, 2011
6,909
5,425
113
Not sure I agree with these as the SEC's bowl record the last couple of years hasn't been that good. They are still living off of pre NIL dominance and ESPN hype IMO.
 

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
30,970
44,164
113
😬 Based on ESPN article/analysis. SP+ is a tempo- and opponent-adjusted measure of college football efficiency. It is a predictive measure of the most sustainable and predictable aspects of football, not a résumé ranking. Along those same lines, these projections aren't intended to be a guess at what the AP Top 25 will look like at the end of the season. These are simply early offseason power rankings based on the information we have been able to gather.

Preseason projections on four primary factors, weighted by their predictiveness:

1. Returning production. The returning production numbers are based on rosters I have updated as much as possible to account for transfers and attrition. Combine last year's SP+ ratings and adjustments based on current returning production numbers, and you're pretty far down the projections road.

2. Recent history. Using a chunk of information from previous seasons gives us a good measure of overall program health, even in this era of wild swings in quality. It still stands to reason that a team that has played well for only one year is less likely to duplicate that effort than a team that has been good -- and has likely spent bigger on its roster -- for years on end (and vice versa).

3. Recent recruiting. This piece informs us of the caliber of a team's potential replacements (and/or new stars) in the lineup. It is determined by both the past few years of recruiting rankings and the quality of incoming transfers, though as you might have predicted while watching Indiana surge to the national title last season, this doesn't carry nearly the weight that it once did. A decade or so ago, this piece made up about 20-25% of the preseason formula. Now it's about 1-2%. That's pretty incredible, isn't it?

4. Coaching change effects.









meh
should be returning production and anticipated starter contribution or something close to that. Using recent history and recruiting, as we've seen, hasn't been a great predictive piece to any model.

that said, the top 5ish is obvious, everyone else is trying not to be the last ones in the desert line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
88,565
86,582
113
meh
should be returning production and anticipated starter contribution or something close to that. Using recent history and recruiting, as we've seen, hasn't been a great predictive piece to any model.

that said, the top 5ish is obvious, everyone else is trying not to be the last ones in the desert line.
Hoping the coaching changes on the defensive side prove the analysis wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
30,970
44,164
113
Hoping the coaching changes on the defensive side prove the analysis wrong.
I hope too but don't really see it. We don't have the horses and the portal haul was not good in the least. I'd argue the talent is worse than last year. I just don't have a lot of faith in the staff to work wonders in their first year and it's still going to be Greg's show. MD is a trainwreck, Mich ST will struggle, Purdue was better last year than their record. I see us battling for bottom four spot.

Offense won't put up the same numbers so that will hurt

we're in a terrible spot in year 7
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Knight Shift

ru109

All-American
Sep 18, 2011
6,909
5,425
113
The data was generated by ESPN, the marketing arm of the SEC and ACC.
I guess that's kind of like Bruce Pearl saying after Texas beat Gonzaga that it really wasn't an upset since Texas plays in the SEC and that they should have gotten more bids the NCAA. They SEC never stops beating the drum that they are the best and everyone else is playing for second despite what the results on the field say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

Jerseylegends

All-Conference
Mar 15, 2023
1,574
1,686
113
I hope too but don't really see it. We don't have the horses and the portal haul was not good in the least. I'd argue the talent is worse than last year. I just don't have a lot of faith in the staff to work wonders in their first year and it's still going to be Greg's show. MD is a trainwreck, Mich ST will struggle, Purdue was better last year than their record. I see us battling for bottom four spot.

Offense won't put up the same numbers so that will hurt

we're in a terrible spot in year 7
Take what I say with a grain of salt because I thought last years team would flirt with a college football playoff birth. Lol But I think the portal haul is sufficient given the upcoming talent on this team. If the defensive lineman they brought in are any good then I think this team can surprise people this year. I like the cb transfer from South Dakota, I believe his name is munn. Combined with Kevin levy I'm excited to see what these corners can do, the Maryland transfer as well. Looking forward to seeing the young lbs develop..kaj sanders should get back on track and live up to the potential. Offense is looking good again, besides the two stars you have potentially 3 or more receivers that can make game changing plays and a veteran offensive line. Surace is s entering a good situation all the pieces are there on offense for sure. So I'm not just saying this if the defensive line transfers pan out maybe they get 9 or 10 wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

RUTGERS95

Heisman
Sep 28, 2005
30,970
44,164
113
Take what I say with a grain of salt because I thought last years team would flirt with a college football playoff birth. Lol But I think the portal haul is sufficient given the upcoming talent on this team. If the defensive lineman they brought in are any good then I think this team can surprise people this year. I like the cb transfer from South Dakota, I believe his name is munn. Combined with Kevin levy I'm excited to see what these corners can do, the Maryland transfer as well. Looking forward to seeing the young lbs develop..kaj sanders should get back on track and live up to the potential. Offense is looking good again, besides the two stars you have potentially 3 or more receivers that can make game changing plays and a veteran offensive line. Surace is s entering a good situation all the pieces are there on offense for sure. So I'm not just saying this if the defensive line transfers pan out maybe they get 9 or 10 wins.
well I do like the glass is half full approach!
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,342
4,644
66
And yet The Grifter cried like a baby after the fluke win v mighty Purdue. Keep Choppin Swindler-In-Chief