Respectable (average) finish to a bad year. 4th place NCAAs, 7 AAs, 1 finalist, 91.5 points.
Adding 2026 NCAA stats to career tallies:
Avg NCAA Points:
Brands (19 seasons) = 90.0
Zalesky (9 seasons) = 91.3
Gable (21 seasons) = 120.7
Sanderson (16 seasons): 128.9
Taylor (2 seasons) = 116.75
Avg NCAA Place:
Brands = 3.3
Zalesky = 3.3
Gable = 1.6
Sanderson = 1.9
Taylor = 2.5
Avg Indiv NCAA Champs:
Brands = 0.7
Zalesky = 1.1
Gable = 2.1
Sanderson = 2.8
Taylor = 2.5
The fundamental arguments for coaching change remain largely unchanged, but were exacerbated by several factors this year:
(1) Tom's stats weren't acceptable under the Gable regime or the Zalesky regime. This was yet another year that his stats didn't improve, and are stubbornly hewing slightly below Zalesky's.
(2) Tom perennially lacks the "hammers" to be a title contender. (Even '21 wouldn't have happened without the serendipitous gift of Eierman's 19.5 points.) This year was more of the same. His 3 champs in the past 10 seasons is equal to Ok State's haul THIS YEAR, and very close to Sanderson's SEASON AVERAGE across 16 seasons!
(3) 6 dual losses in a single season. (Zalesky was fired for 7 losses & 4th place finish @ NCAAs with 0 champs.)
(4) Ticket sales & attendance down
(5) HWC not competitive (though a decent year so far)
(6) Iowa will not be vying for 1st or 2nd for at least the next 4 years. 6 of Ok St's starters were freshmen (4 true, 1 redshirt). 6 of Penn St's starters were freshmen or sophs (2 true fr, 1 redshirt, 3 sophs). Both have more talent coming in next year. Iowa loses its top 3 point scorers from this season, and next year could be brutal.
These are the stats. The only thing that's subjective is whether or not this level of performance--not great but not horrible--is acceptable for the Iowa program. It appears that we have slowly and steadily grown used to it, so the answer is likely yes.
Kudos and congrats to the wrestlers and coaches for a gutsy performance at NCAAs. There was some good wrestling, and it was a fun tournament to watch.
Adding 2026 NCAA stats to career tallies:
Avg NCAA Points:
Brands (19 seasons) = 90.0
Zalesky (9 seasons) = 91.3
Gable (21 seasons) = 120.7
Sanderson (16 seasons): 128.9
Taylor (2 seasons) = 116.75
Avg NCAA Place:
Brands = 3.3
Zalesky = 3.3
Gable = 1.6
Sanderson = 1.9
Taylor = 2.5
Avg Indiv NCAA Champs:
Brands = 0.7
Zalesky = 1.1
Gable = 2.1
Sanderson = 2.8
Taylor = 2.5
The fundamental arguments for coaching change remain largely unchanged, but were exacerbated by several factors this year:
(1) Tom's stats weren't acceptable under the Gable regime or the Zalesky regime. This was yet another year that his stats didn't improve, and are stubbornly hewing slightly below Zalesky's.
(2) Tom perennially lacks the "hammers" to be a title contender. (Even '21 wouldn't have happened without the serendipitous gift of Eierman's 19.5 points.) This year was more of the same. His 3 champs in the past 10 seasons is equal to Ok State's haul THIS YEAR, and very close to Sanderson's SEASON AVERAGE across 16 seasons!
(3) 6 dual losses in a single season. (Zalesky was fired for 7 losses & 4th place finish @ NCAAs with 0 champs.)
(4) Ticket sales & attendance down
(5) HWC not competitive (though a decent year so far)
(6) Iowa will not be vying for 1st or 2nd for at least the next 4 years. 6 of Ok St's starters were freshmen (4 true, 1 redshirt). 6 of Penn St's starters were freshmen or sophs (2 true fr, 1 redshirt, 3 sophs). Both have more talent coming in next year. Iowa loses its top 3 point scorers from this season, and next year could be brutal.
These are the stats. The only thing that's subjective is whether or not this level of performance--not great but not horrible--is acceptable for the Iowa program. It appears that we have slowly and steadily grown used to it, so the answer is likely yes.
Kudos and congrats to the wrestlers and coaches for a gutsy performance at NCAAs. There was some good wrestling, and it was a fun tournament to watch.