Hindsight is 20/20. But not developing players early in the season really hurt this team. You put JJ at point and actually coach him with what you need and want as a coach, and it isn’t NBA showtime step backs. Or roll with Chandler at point and get him attacking the rim, the only thing he wanted to do was shoot 3s. Having DA at point was the lazy way to do it. Pope just never developed anything that this team could do well, but Pope allowing terrible shots and not teaching his team. Kam was misused and had a ton more to offer, his handle wasn’t bad and could attack the rim. I’m rambling but Pope just did a terrible job.
Nah, completely disagree about DA.
DA turned out to be a pretty damn good point guard. Good assist to turn over ratio. Good clutch shots. Decent shooting and driving. Decent handles.
DA at point is one thing that actually worked out this season.
Chandler can't play point. Not good enough handles. Not as good of a passer. Not a good driver. His strength is spot up threes. His skills would never transfer to PG.
Additionally, JJ can't play PG either. He is WAYYY too selfish as a player. He wants to drive or jack up bad threes immediately as he touches the ball. He really should have played even less than he did during the back half of the season.
Lastly, JJ is just too tiny and weak to play ANY position in the SEC currently. He looks like a child on the court.
JJ also can't play defense. He only made shots in the first half of the season. He doesn't pass. He takes bad shots. He's too short and weak to enter the lane. He needs time to develop. He needs to get stronger with better decision making.
Please explain to me your logic in how Pope could have developed Chandler or JJ into a better PG than DA became, and how having DA NOT be the point guard would allow him to help the team more than DA was able to as a PG.
IDK, I basically disagree with your entire comment.