With NIL and transfer portal these small schools have no chance. USF, Troy, HP, all getting dominated. SAD 
I guess. I’m talking about small schools not +-2 spreadsA #10 beating a #7 is a bit of an upset. Might be seeing that pretty quick.
Don't get too giddy at the thought.A #10 beating a #7 is a bit of an upset. Might be seeing that pretty quick.
HP is down 2 at halftime. Pretty sure that's not dominatedWith NIL and transfer portal these small schools have no chance. USF, Troy, HP, all getting dominated. SAD![]()
I read 37.8% of the time over the years.A #10 beating a #7 is a bit of an upset. Might be seeing that pretty quick.
I read 37.8% of the time over the years.
I think this is false. The top teams are no better than they ever were. What you are actually seeing is more parity in the middle tier group of teams as a result of NIL & transfer portal.With NIL and transfer portal these small schools have no chance. USF, Troy, HP, all getting dominated. SAD![]()
He fits in with all of the negative Nancy’s.Now OP looks like a fool.
beat me to itThe OP didn’t age well. The fighting Tubsters say Hi.
If that happens I will be content with however this season for us ends up. No matter what, when Duke loses all is right in the universe.No way that Duke loses. That would be impossible
Can I be your bookie?With NIL and transfer portal these small schools have no chance. USF, Troy, HP, all getting dominated. SAD![]()
The ultimate jinx thread for High Point!With NIL and transfer portal these small schools have no chance. USF, Troy, HP, all getting dominated. SAD![]()
I'm with you completely impossible.No way in hell Duke loses. Completely impossible.
I think this is false. The top teams are no better than they ever were. What you are actually seeing is more parity in the middle tier group of teams as a result of NIL & transfer portal.
In the men's NCAA tournament first round (since 1985/expansion), top seeds are dominant, with No. 1 seeds winning roughly 99% of their games. Winning percentages decrease by seed: No. 2s win $\sim$93%, No. 3s $\sim$86%, and No. 4s $\sim$79%. The highest-ranked underdog seeds to historically succeed are No. 12 (approx. 35% win rate).
- 1 Seed vs. 16 Seed: ~99% win rate (158-2 record)
- 2 Seed vs. 15 Seed: ~93% win rate (149-11 record)
- 3 Seed vs. 14 Seed: ~86% win rate (137-23 record)
- 4 Seed vs. 13 Seed: ~79% win rate (127-33 record)
- 5 Seed vs. 12 Seed: ~64% win rate (103-57 record)
- 6 Seed vs. 11 Seed: ~61% win rate (98-62 record)
- 7 Seed vs. 10 Seed: ~59% win rate (97-62 record)
- 8 Seed vs. 9 Seed: ~52% win rate (83-77 record)
- No. 12 seeds are the most dangerous lower seed, winning over 30% of their games against No. 5s.
- No. 13 seeds hold a 20.6% winning percentage against No. 4 seeds.
- No. 16 seeds have only won twice in 160 matchups against No. 1 seeds, resulting in a 1.25% winning percentage.
Same thing with Zion, Bagley, Flagg, Tatum, Laettner, JWill, etc. Just look at how many POYs duke has had over the years. They’ve had several. Now, look at how many of those same players are elite in the league. Not very many at all. That tells you all you need to know. Preferential treatment at its finest! Grotesque!Boozer has a big a.ss advantage, the refs give him every fkn call, it's unreal![]()
Boozer 14 ft'sBoozer has a big a.ss advantage, the refs give him every fkn call, it's unreal![]()