Stop moving the goal posts. First year or not, BAMA had WAAAAAY more talent than Louisiana Monroe. That ULM team was 6-6 that year.
Pope is 1-0 vs Pitino
"If Pitino is a better coach than Pope, he probably should have beaten Pope coaching this year's Kentucky team."
Weatherbie was 1-0 vs Saban.
If "Saban" is a better coach than "Weatherbie", he probably should have beaten Weatherbie coaching that year's University of Louisiana Monroe team."
See what I did there?
I'm not "moving the goal posts." Using logic created by the mentality of this message board, if Saban is a better coach than Weatherbie , he probably should have beaten Weatherbie coaching the 2007 Louisiana-Monroe team, if that Louisiana-Monroe team was the worst in program history.
In the opinion of this message board, Calipari was not good enough to continue coaching here. In his tenure, however, he was 9-2 against Rick Pitino, the coach this particular thread is clamoring over. Mark Pope, UK's current coach, also beat Pitino this season, with what many on here call the worst team they have seen put on the Kentucky uniform, worse even than the 9-16 team of 2021.
The question asked is, "Why are older people so opposed to bringing Pitino back?" My rebuttal question is, "Why bring back a coach that can't beat the current or former coach?" Pitino has shown no reason why he would be atop our list of coaches, simply by his record against us over the last sixteen years. That is not including all the off the court issues.
Is Mark Pope the better coach? Personally, I don't think he will ever come close to a lifetime resume of Pitino. Is he the better coach right now? Well, he won the head to head matchup against him this year, and Pitino has stunk against UK in recent history. Plus, Pitino's seventy-three years old, come with tons of baggage, and should not be on anyone's top ten list. I would not take him over Pope, because I don't think it significantly increases the current product, and potentially sets us back even further.