Lino Mark

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,006
12,811
113
It doesn’t matter who Pike hires. He’s a D first style head coach and always will be if he’s to have successes. The blueprint was there up until that Michigan State game when Mag went down.

You make it sound like Knights presence has little impact on the vision of the offense.

Which is the opposite of other posts where if Knight leaves for Pitt we have no vision or offensive plan to pitch to transfers.

So which is it - does Knight being on staff matter or not for recruiting transfers?
 

tru2ru1

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
5,674
3,341
66
Exactly. Francis does well because we have no offense and he can create for himself off the dribble, unlike others on the team. Francis is a bench player on most P5 teams but we are devoid of talent, so he excels. The bottom like is there is not a single player on this frankenroster that we cannot afford to lose. We should low-ball a few of the players, and if they stay, fine.

Of course, Pike has proven he’s incapable of constructing a winning roster in the NIL age, so his last year here will probably be more of the same. Regardless, continuity of keeping players means nothing for a 10-win team filled with low-ceiling mid major players.
Magoo you really are blind if you think Francis would be a bench player on most teams!!! Pretty sure he is the second leading scorer in the B1G
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
38,142
19,481
98
Something I noticed in the Penn State game is Lino’s off the ball defense.

he really clogged up the middle of the lane when the ball was on one side and his man was on the other side of the court.

His quick reaction and recovering speed was really good. Now if he can still do this when guarding a better shooter will be interesting to watch for.
 

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,372
6,304
113
I’ll eat some crow re: my comments on mark

I had said that his potential was much lower than powers. Now I think it’s debatable .

frankly in the last few games he has shown MORE than powers. That’s unquestionable

His ability to get to the rim is indeed impressive and his d is good.

Now having a point guard who doesn’t really distribute that well and his shooting is very questionable …. There are still big question marks about his ceiling . If he doesn’t develop the ability to facilitate the offense and shoot then maybe he’s close to his ceiling already? I don’t know.

But with powers - I just get the sense that he’s just scratching the surface and that he will DEVELOP into a very solid big 10 guard. But his development will take longer. He just strikes me as a guy who becomes really good as an upperclassman as his game matures.

if given the choice who to retain… tough call.

a few weeks ago I thought it was clearly powers. Now - not so sure.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
I’ll eat some crow re: my comments on mark

I had said that his potential was much lower than powers. Now I think it’s debatable .

frankly in the last few games he has shown MORE than powers. That’s unquestionable

His ability to get to the rim is indeed impressive and his d is good.

Now having a point guard who doesn’t really distribute that well and his shooting is very questionable …. There are still big question marks about his ceiling . If he doesn’t develop the ability to facilitate the offense and shoot then maybe he’s close to his ceiling already? I don’t know.

But with powers - I just get the sense that he’s just scratching the surface and that he will DEVELOP into a very solid big 10 guard. But his development will take longer. He just strikes me as a guy who becomes really good as an upperclassman as his game matures.

if given the choice who to retain… tough call.

a few weeks ago I thought it was clearly powers. Now - not so sure.
What have you not watched about Mark’s shooting saying it is questionable ? He is finishing almost everything at the rim whereas he drove earlier in the year and hardly ever converted. He started 0-17 from 3. But since the USC game about 8-10 games ago he is shooting 50% from 3 although in a small sample size at 8/16. So his shooting has improved a lot. Regarding his passing it will get better as he was the only one to give Ogbole an alley oop yesterday. As more attention is paid to him or when defenses try to send 2 guys to stop his blur fast breaks he will dish to the wings for 3’s. Overall , we have a point guard and have to keep him.
Regarding Powers he is also needs to be retained for a lot of the reasons you state. It shouldn’t be one or the other . We need both back.
 

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,401
4,777
113
With more money you have a better chance of getting some proven players, but I agree with you that we don’t have the money to get proven stars at least not stars from high level conferences. Neither Francis nor Spencer were highly sought after when they came to Rutgers. Did Pikiel know that they would become as good as they did, probably not. But I think he saw potential in them. Pikiel needs to get a little bit lucky next year with the players he gets. It’s also not all about skill, this year’s team plays soft, doesn’t rebound or hustle on defense. That’s been a huge disappointment. One positive for Pikiel’s defense first philosophy is that defensive players are not as sought after.
You can always throw 10 million at only five players and play zone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletDave

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,401
4,777
113
Magoo you really are blind if you think Francis would be a bench player on most teams!!! Pretty sure he is the second leading scorer in the B1G

Magoo you really are blind if you think Francis would be a bench player on most teams!!! Pretty sure he is the second leading scorer in the B1G
Most teams, maybe not, but he would come off the bench for 5 or 6 of them easily, as they wouldn't need his scoring. I mean let's not forget he spent much of the season coming off the bench for us, and we're one of the worst teams in the league.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,077
12,419
78
Big IF but if we keep both of them and get it done early, Pike will at least be positioned well for once to shop for the type of players he likes.
 

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,598
4,662
62
1st 13 gm,
11.3min, 10-44 22.8%, 3pt 0-11 0%, FT 14-16, 2.6pts, 1.5 reb, 0.5ast

Last 17 gm, All B1G games
18.3min, 46-95 48.4%, 3pt 8-24 33%, FT 29-38, 7.6pts, 1.7 reb, 1.5ast

Last 10 B1G games 54.4/44.4/71.4
9gm(missed vs NEB), 19.8min, 10.8pts, 1.9reb, 1.8ast
8gm(-1 min vs MD), 22.9min 12.1pt, 2.1reb, 2.0ast
3pt 6-10 60%, last 5 gm.

He really came on the end of the season. What was a weakness, the backcourt, in the beginning of the year has become a strength w/ Francis, Mark, Powers, Davis and Zrno.
 

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,595
15,347
85
We need a center who avg 10 points per game. They are out there. I don’t care if it costs $3 million. It’s the most important thing. No more getting tall muscular guys who score 3 pts and pray that somehow Pike and his magic lamp will suddenly turn those kids into offense powers with post moves, positioning and FT shooting. Every other Big Man in the B1G can shoot 3s and FTs now except us, we live in 2003 offense
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,096
10,615
82
We need a center who avg 10 points per game. They are out there. I don’t care if it costs $3 million. It’s the most important thing. No more getting tall muscular guys who score 3 pts and pray that somehow Pike and his magic lamp will suddenly turn those kids into offense powers with post moves, positioning and FT shooting. Every other Big Man in the B1G can shoot 3s and FTs now except us, we live in 2003 offense
More importantly we need a center that can defend, block shots and rebound
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbe4

Ru-baby

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2001
6,659
3,048
66
Tonight really may be something that affects Lino stock. He’s showing some good stuff lately but today it was clear that he’s not a knockdown three-point shooter, which is somewhat needed for a smaller guard. Hope he stays next year and is that off the bench spark plug
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightKnight

FastMJ

All-American
Jan 6, 2007
33,929
6,614
68
Tonight really may be something that affects Lino stock. He’s showing some good stuff lately but today it was clear that he’s not a knockdown three-point shooter, which is somewhat needed for a smaller guard. Hope he stays next year and is that off the bench spark plug
yeah he’s clearly a work in progress
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ru-baby

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,446
16,279
113
He's terrible against zone defenses. Can't shoot. Ineffective against condensed traffic in the paint. Not a drive and kick guy.

Agree with you. Basketball is always situational and about matchups. Credit Pike for not using him as much in this game, especially since we didn’t press much.
 
Jul 1, 2025
372
634
93
yeah, this is all money ball talk which is the world we live in. It’s actually pretty wild to think how expendable everybody is at this stage. Remember when senior day used to be an emotional event?

I think I was at the last real good one: Ron, Geo, Caleb I still have the T-shirt.
 

29PAS

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
3,409
1,389
113
Mark had the back brace on in the second half. Was that the reason he didn't play (or play much) or was it the zone defense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,300
1,808
42
Mark is 2 years away from maybe being a backup! Struggle placate rim. cannot shoot. Undersized!

He looked better out on the brake against man to man. He could turn into a contributor but next year we shouldn’t be relying on him.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,077
12,419
78
Mark is 2 years away from maybe being a backup! Struggle placate rim. cannot shoot. Undersized!

He looked better out on the brake against man to man. He could turn into a contributor but next year we shouldn’t be relying on him.

Fortunately - this opinion is coming from someone who thinks Tariq would be a 7 or 8 man at best on any other high major roster so your probably wrong about this too.
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
Mark is 2 years away from maybe being a backup! Struggle placate rim. cannot shoot. Undersized!

He looked better out on the brake against man to man. He could turn into a contributor but next year we shouldn’t be relying on him.
You obviously have not been watching . Everything you said isn’t factual even if yesterday he didn’t play well or shoot well. Just ignore his last 6 games before that then you are fine. Other people actually look at what a player actually does on the court . He broke down man and he broke down zone played by other teams but you want to ignore , that is fine. He has more upside than any of the other freshman and I think Powers has big upside also. Just ignore
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,300
1,808
42
Fortunately - this opinion is coming from someone who thinks Tariq would be a 7 or 8 man at best on any other high major roster so your probably wrong about this too.
Also a fact! Tariq is a good player whose best position is coming off the bench. He doesn’t play much more then 10-12 mins a game on a top tier team

Hell Pike did it for 3/4 of the season.

You support Pike so I guess worth both wrong.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,300
1,808
42
You obviously have not been watching . Everything you said isn’t factual even if yesterday he didn’t play well or shoot well. Just ignore his last 6 games before that then you are fine. Other people actually look at what a player actually does on the court . He broke down man and he broke down zone played by other teams but you want to ignore , that is fine. He has more upside than any of the other freshman and I think Powers has big upside also. Just ignore
You can have your opinion! I watch or attend every game. Mark had 5-6 serviceable game all year.

He is to small, he can not shoot, and struggles against the zone.

Good thing your not the GM
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,300
1,808
42
Fortunately - this opinion is coming from someone who thinks Tariq would be a 7 or 8 man at best on any other high major roster so your probably wrong about this too.
How did Tariq look against a bigger guard lineup on back to backs?
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,077
12,419
78
How did Tariq look against a bigger guard lineup on back to backs?

Your kidding, right? Come on man. He looked tired having played 2 back to back games. Went 0-5 from 3. Last game against UCLA he was 2 for 3 from deep and 4 of 8 overall from the field. Nobody dominates game in and out.

This was Tariq’s first single digit game since 1/8. Before that, 12/13. He’s been incredibly consistent scoring the ball at the high major level. Full stop. Ace Bailey, for perspective, had twice as many single digit outputs during the same span.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mugrat86

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,833
25,516
113
Most teams, maybe not, but he would come off the bench for 5 or 6 of them easily, as they wouldn't need his scoring. I mean let's not forget he spent much of the season coming off the bench for us, and we're one of the worst teams in the league.
It was more of a strategy
Francis was clearly not a bench player because he was our best scorer

Maybe Pike thought he could keep the others teams and coaches attention away from him a bit this way

Or take some of the pressure off him
As long as he got the major minutes it didn't matter
 

bitnez

All-American
Jan 18, 2006
6,394
6,983
113
Assuming he’s back I’d loved to see Francis dedicate himself to the gym. He’s a small guy and 10 lbs is probably asking too much but an extra 5 lbs of muscle on his frame would go a long way.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,077
12,419
78
It was more of a strategy
Francis was clearly not a bench player because he was our best scorer

Maybe Pike thought he could keep the others teams and coaches attention away from him a bit this way

Or take some of the pressure off him
As long as he got the major minutes it didn't matter

Tariq has the most one year potential on the roster. Anyone who doesn’t see this is blind. He showed steady improvement at almost every facet of the game over the course of the season and he did what he did without a great facilitator and virtually zero front court scoring threat to compliment his game.

Yet we have folks pointing to one off game coming off a 29 point performance claiming it proves Tariq should be a bench warmer on a decent team. Mind boggling to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundcrib