But his teams were considered top programs for awhile and that's what I'm talking about.
I feel Bill Forster built RU MBB into a program on the way to be elite
Back in those days making the NCAA was a lot tougher than it is today and the support Young (239-116 as RU's HC)) and Forster received from the University had a lot to do with not being a regular tourney entrant (Foster despite being 120–75 in his RU career) never made one .
Both moved on ( on their own)and should be considered better than all who came after them and built programs we could be more proud of than any RU HC did that came after them.
Maybe I was wrong to say RU was ever a top College program , but both Young and Foster came the closest to building one and Young did make Rutgers a great one at least for one year .
A google search had Young coaching a top program, but accepting it is a personal choice.
>Yes, Rutgers men's basketball was considered a top-tier program during
Tom Young’s tenure (1973–1985). Young, the program's winningest coach with a 239-117 record, led the 1976 team to a perfect 26-0 regular season and the NCAA Final Four. During this era, the program had no losing seasons, made four NCAA Tournament appearances, and frequently played at a high level. <
another search found this
>Bill Foster ushered in the first truly successful era in Rutgers basketball history. His eight teams posted a 120-75 record, following a 22-7 mark in 1966-67 with a 21-4 mark in 1968-69. That 1966-67 team earned a
third-place finish in the NIT, becoming the first Rutgers basketball team to reach post-season play.<
Bill was the HC when I started following the RU MBB team,
WBB wasn't around yet and Dr.John had the RU FB program rolling , in a D-1AA way.