Ogbome and jmike give it up for these two!

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,410
4,787
113
Jmike was solid af
Highest 3 pt. shooting percentage of the guards, best assist/turnover ratio on the team, and at 6'2" and only playing 26 mpg, the fourth highest in rebounds per game on the team, the best defender of the guards, and the team leader and captain - that's a lot of pretty good things. Don't ya think?
 
Last edited:

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
Highest 3 pt. shooting percentage of the guards, best assist/turnover ratio on the team, and at 6'2" and only playing 26 mpg, the fourth highest in rebounds per game on the team, the best defender of the guards, and the team leader and captain - that's a lot of pretty good things. Don't ya think?
The effort and really big his offensive rebound to keep a late possession alive was a great win on a 50/50 ball. But the problem with JMike is his consistency. Too many games shooting 0-5 , getting torched by the opposing point guard and not getting the team into the offense or passing down low. JMike in this back up role is perfect as it strengthens the bench and he can give the team a spark. UCLa has Dent , Clark and forget the third guard. He will have to bring it and pressure them so they have a hard time getting into their sets. Want to see consistency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,342
4,644
66
Doesn't nearly make up for your continuous "Acebait" insults. Not called for,not REMOTELY funny.
If the truth happens to be an insult, so be it. Aside from the other school in the running for Bailey (SEC school) look at his offer list. Or look at the 3 year eye test.
 

Degaz-RU

Heisman
Dec 19, 2002
22,308
26,532
88
If the truth happens to be an insult, so be it. Aside from the other school in the running for Bailey (SEC school) look at his offer list. Or look at the 3 year eye test.
Well, the 3-year eye test shows that he was a developmental guard who has been a "solid" backup guard at the P5 level, but has to play starter's minutes here because we didn't have anybody better.

He's not the cannon fodder you've made him out to be. He would be a perfect 4th guard on a good team with better talent. It's not his fault he's being asked to be a starting PG.
 

Zebnatto1!

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2025
164
156
42
If the truth happens to be an insult, so be it. Aside from the other school in the running for Bailey (SEC school) look at his offer list. Or look at the 3 year eye test.
Learn something about language, and if you graduated RU in '65, you should: The truth doesn't happen to be an insult. A writer, in this case Shelby65, chooses to frame it as such.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,342
4,644
66
Well, the 3-year eye test shows that he was a developmental guard who has been a "solid" backup guard at the P5 level, but has to play starter's minutes here because we didn't have anybody better.

He's not the cannon fodder you've made him out to be. He would be a perfect 4th guard on a good team with better talent. It's not his fault he's being asked to be a starting PG.
Not his fault but it’s true he was recruited to Big10 ball only as bait.