One thing I see on this board and all over social media are people only looking at "What have you done for me lately." Why it's valid to a degree, it's missing the mark. One must consider the bigger picture.
Kentucky is not a job you learn at. You are proven before you get the job. What does that mean?
Constant NCAA tourney success, constant sweet 16s, elite 8s over 10 year span. And/or at least 1 final four. Someone who can recruit high end players and develop tier 2 players who are just below the high end. Is competitive, and has a winning mindset. Unfortunately, for UK and a few other blue bloods you need to have a specific personality and temperament to handle the job. Also has to have a decent winning %.
There are many layers of variables one must consider for the coach.
Right now here are the Candidates that most want to replace Pope with, winning % wise.
Mark Pope | Overall: 227-132 | Winning: 63.2%
S16: 1
E8: 0
F4:
---
Bruce Pearl | Overall: 706-268 | Winning: 72.5%
S16: 4
E8: 2
F4: 2
Todd Golden | Overall: 185-75 | Winning: 67.8%
S16: 1
E8: 1
F4: 1
Title: 1
Dusty May | Overall: 181-81 | Winning: 69.1%
S16: 2
E8: 1
F4: 1
Nate Oats | Overall: 264-114 | Winning: 68.8%
S16: 3
E8: 2
F4: 1
Grant McCasland | Overall: 262-109 | Winning: 70.6%
S16: 1
E8: 1
F4: 0
T.J. Otzelberger | Overall: 218-114 | Winning: 65.7%
S16: 2
E8: 0
F4: 0
Mark Byington | Overall: 264-157 | Winning: 62.7%
S16: 0
E8: 0
F4: 0
Kentucky is not a job you learn at. You are proven before you get the job. What does that mean?
Constant NCAA tourney success, constant sweet 16s, elite 8s over 10 year span. And/or at least 1 final four. Someone who can recruit high end players and develop tier 2 players who are just below the high end. Is competitive, and has a winning mindset. Unfortunately, for UK and a few other blue bloods you need to have a specific personality and temperament to handle the job. Also has to have a decent winning %.
There are many layers of variables one must consider for the coach.
Right now here are the Candidates that most want to replace Pope with, winning % wise.
Mark Pope | Overall: 227-132 | Winning: 63.2%
S16: 1
E8: 0
F4:
---
Bruce Pearl | Overall: 706-268 | Winning: 72.5%
S16: 4
E8: 2
F4: 2
Todd Golden | Overall: 185-75 | Winning: 67.8%
S16: 1
E8: 1
F4: 1
Title: 1
Dusty May | Overall: 181-81 | Winning: 69.1%
S16: 2
E8: 1
F4: 1
Nate Oats | Overall: 264-114 | Winning: 68.8%
S16: 3
E8: 2
F4: 1
Grant McCasland | Overall: 262-109 | Winning: 70.6%
S16: 1
E8: 1
F4: 0
T.J. Otzelberger | Overall: 218-114 | Winning: 65.7%
S16: 2
E8: 0
F4: 0
Mark Byington | Overall: 264-157 | Winning: 62.7%
S16: 0
E8: 0
F4: 0
Last edited: