Who would Have Thought…

satnom

All-American
Jun 28, 2002
6,948
8,526
88
that at end of this season many of us are contemplating bringing back at least five players from this year’s roster back next season?

The mindset of most RU fans prior to season was that this roster was devoid of any high major talent and that Pike would be gone sooner rather later.

Guess that’s why we play the games and development is still a component of roster construction in the post NIL world we live in.

GO RU
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,212
176,876
113
this team is devoid of starting big 10 and really only Francis/Buch starting next year meaning the portal needs to be huge for Pike. Since Pike now has $$$$$$ why wouldnt he upgrade overall the lesser talent that he bought with little money

your post is quite odd. The roster is going to get a significant upgrade with most of the returning players getting a cut in their playing time. The rosy picture you paint on a failed season going possibly 13-18/6-14 while acting as if RU lives in some vacuum with respect to other schools in the conference
 

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,625
3,153
113
that at end of this season many of us are contemplating bringing back at least five players from this year’s roster back next season?

The mindset of most RU fans prior to season was that this roster was devoid of any high major talent and that Pike would be gone sooner rather later.

Guess that’s why we play the games and development is still a component of roster construction in the post NIL world we live in.

GO RU
At least 5? By that you mean 2-3ish. When people throw out some names but at the right price that doesn’t mean they think they’re big ten quality enough to strive for a 10 win conference season.
 

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,595
15,347
85
this team is devoid of starting big 10 and really only Francis/Buch starting next year meaning the portal needs to be huge for Pike. Since Pike now has $$$$$$ why wouldnt he upgrade overall the lesser talent that he bought with little money

your post is quite odd. The roster is going to get a significant upgrade with most of the returning players getting a cut in their playing time. The rosy picture you paint on a failed season going possibly 13-18/6-14 while acting as if RU lives in some vacuum with respect to other schools in the conference
What’s your definition of “Big Ten”? Would Powers or Lino start on putrid Penn State? Maryland whos one of the worst teams I’ve ever watched play basketball? Minnesota who plays walkons by February every season? Pretty stupid. No they wouldn’t start on Purdue. But there are 18 teams in this league and these guys are about to get a bye in the Big Ten tourney, something we have not often received.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ru66+

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,212
176,876
113
no one cares if you finish 14th or 17th. you proved my point...any big 10 team with aspirations.....i will say Lino could start and I think has a future but he is likely gone. Point still remains, most of the returning players will be bench players next year....when are people going to wake up that we have at least $8 million to spend on better players...its up to Pike to get them

bye in the big 10 tourney..lmfao..what are you talking about...there are 18 schools now, this is the first time they are having a tourney with all 18...we made the tourney last year
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,080
12,421
78
no one cares if you finish 14th or 17th. you proved my point...any big 10 team with aspirations.....i will say Lino could start and I think has a future but he is likely gone. Point still remains, most of the returning players will be bench players next year....when are people going to wake up that we have at least $8 million to spend on better players...its up to Pike to get them
Richie said on the podcast could be 10M?
 

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,374
6,308
113
no one cares if you finish 14th or 17th. you proved my point...any big 10 team with aspirations.....i will say Lino could start and I think has a future but he is likely gone. Point still remains, most of the returning players will be bench players next year....when are people going to wake up that we have at least $8 million to spend on better players...its up to Pike to get them

bye in the big 10 tourney..lmfao..what are you talking about...there are 18 schools now, this is the first time they are having a tourney with all 18...we made the tourney last year

agree that Lino could be a starter … for RuTgers.

but on any Big10 team with any hopes of a winning season mark is no where near starter quality

we need better players !!!
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,212
176,876
113
Richie said on the podcast could be 10M?
if its 10 million that is awesome and yet there is some disconnect from some of our fans relishing the thought of most of the roster coming back....are they going to realize that its the center, the forward and the guard we spend most of our monies on along with francis...the other 6-7 roster guys pick the scraps up
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
if its 10 million that is awesome and yet there is some disconnect from some of our fans relishing the thought of most of the roster coming back....are they going to realize that its the center, the forward and the guard we spend most of our monies on along with francis...the other 6-7 roster guys pick the scraps up
Any reasonable objective Rutgers fan knows that we need a 5 that can score in the low post and be a rim protector and we desparately need a 0power forward that most importantly can defensive rebound, hopefully can offensive rebound , plays defense , and can score if given the ball down low. That is priority 1 and Priority 1 and if you have to spend 4 million for that you do it.
Then you go get an impact 2 or 3 wing that can score .
But retention is also key Francis has shown and his distribution the last 8 games or so , is a retainer subject to Pitt coach situation.
Lino has shown he can play at a high level over the last 8-10 BIg 10 games and he plays good defense.
Not sure to make of BAC’s hate if Powers . He can shoot , he can drive , he can pass perfecting the pick and roll and most importantly he is not afraid to attack the defense and look to score. His defense needs work but gotten better. His size and form on his shot oozes an impact 2 guard. To get a much better player to come here first and then pay him second which is 1.5
Million for an impact 2 guard will not be easy or doable. Especially if Francis is back.
Arguments can be made to keep Zrno, Buchanan and Nwuili and I think they will be within our budget.
Arguments can be made to not retain Dylan, Davis and Dorsch and there are better players out there but they would give us older experience off the bench. If any of them wants serious money let them walk.
 

satnom

All-American
Jun 28, 2002
6,948
8,526
88
At least 5? By that you mean 2-3ish. When people throw out some names but at the right price that doesn’t mean they think they’re big ten quality enough to strive for a 10 win conference season.
Remember it’s not bring back at least five to start. It’s to be in rotatition.

Francis - start
Powers - start , first off bench
Buchanan - off bench
Zrno - off bench
Jmike - off bench
EO - off bench, not coming back
Mark - off bench, not coming nack
Nwuili - off bench, not coming back

GO RU
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,107
10,632
82
no one cares if you finish 14th or 17th. you proved my point...any big 10 team with aspirations.....i will say Lino could start and I think has a future but he is likely gone. Point still remains, most of the returning players will be bench players next year....when are people going to wake up that we have at least $8 million to spend on better players...its up to Pike to get them

bye in the big 10 tourney..lmfao..what are you talking about...there are 18 schools now, this is the first time they are having a tourney with all 18...we made the tourney last year
You are assuming that Powers, Mark and Nwuli don't get any better from their freshman years. I really think Mark is going to be a definite BIG1G starter, maybe as early as next year. He is the most improved player from the beginning of the year to the end that I could ever remember. His game reminds me of Jacob Young's, and he didn't dramatically improve till the second half of his junior year. His shot is so much better. I know Richie claims he is gone, but that was before his big turn around. I am thinking he could definitely change his mind with a nice contract offer.

Powers has also shown considerable improvement, and who knows what his ceiling is. As another poster already mentioned, John Battle's improvement from freshman year to sophomore is legendary. There were a lot of people just like you who would say John would never become a NBA player after his freshman year, and I think Powers is a guy to bet on
 

RUKen1

Redshirt
Jul 5, 2025
19
23
2
Pike must win next year. It won’t be with 5 plus current players. If 5 stay most will have a diminished role in 26/27. The 5 that stay cost $1.5M. Bring in $8.5M of value from other places. Assuming current like their future role
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,415
7,677
113
Has ability but paired with another small guard in Francis not ideal.

Sounds like it won’t be an issue to contend with when he leaves.

GO RU
That would only be for 1 more year. Francis is gone after next year. .Whether it is Powers or Zrno or Wooten or another player it will likely be a 6’4-6’5 guard.
 

bigbirdru

Junior
Mar 6, 2010
2,287
386
83
We all remember what Geo, Ron, Myles, Cliff etc were as freshman. Not great. They got better each year. That’s what I see in this group. You can’t bring in freshman and then panic when they aren’t ready day 1. Especially given how Pike has struggled with wholesale roster changes in the NIL/portal era.
 

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,625
3,153
113
Remember it’s not bring back at least five to start. It’s to be in rotatition.

Francis - start
Powers - start , first off bench
Buchanan - off bench
Zrno - off bench
Jmike - off bench
EO - off bench, not coming back
Mark - off bench, not coming nack
Nwuili - off bench, not coming back

GO RU
I like Francis, Buchanan and Powers OR Zrno. Two of them can start. Then I want three new starters. That’s six. I’d rather pay 2-3 more new players to come off the bench who are better than your other retainees. If some of those retainees you want will play for dirt then sure, they can stay.
 

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
24,377
38,628
113
We will be here next year discussing the bad information floating around that 10M is an actual budget, which is still 15th to 18th in the B1G and bottom 15% in Power 4 programs nationally.

You cannot win on a shoe string budget, 10M gets you a NCAA tournament starting 5, not a 13 player roster.

Just because someone posts bad information that cannot be verified like how much NIL money is there (which many RU fans somehow buy as legitimate), the names posted on the Round Table are 90% mid to low majors players.....who are productive.

Which is fine, but doesnt address the center position, which by itself, is a floor price of 1.75M to 3M.....not because the player is actually worth it, but they're limited in quantity and quality.

If 1 player costs 2M, 8 M for the rest is not a real budget folks.....not a bonafide one that can contend for a bid.

14M is the floor in the B1G, not 10M.....stop falling for bad information folks...
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,212
176,876
113
Remember it’s not bring back at least five to start. It’s to be in rotatition.

Francis - start
Powers - start , first off bench
Buchanan - off bench
Zrno - off bench
Jmike - off bench
EO - off bench, not coming back
Mark - off bench, not coming nack
Nwuili - off bench, not coming back

GO RU
then what was the point of your rah rah thread since almost all of them are going to be passed by portal players....are you celebrating role players?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dark_check

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,212
176,876
113
We will be here next year discussing the bad information floating around that 10M is an actual budget, which is still 15th to 18th in the B1G and bottom 15% in Power 4 programs nationally.

You cannot win on a shoe string budget, 10M gets you a NCAA tournament starting 5, not a 13 player roster.

Just because someone posts bad information that cannot be verified like how much NIL money is there (which many RU fans somehow buy as legitimate), the names posted on the Round Table are 90% mid to low majors players.....who are productive.

Which is fine, but doesnt address the center position, which by itself, is a floor price of 1.75M to 3M.....not because the player is actually worth it, but they're limited in quantity and quality.

If 1 player costs 2M, 8 M for the rest is not a real budget folks.....not a bonafide one that can contend for a bid.

14M is the floor in the B1G, not 10M.....stop falling for bad information folks...
while I agree RU will still be in the bottom 6 grouping, they are still cutting the gap from what it was....RU spending $8-10 will still put them near schools like iowa and nebraska and maryland. RU will never spend 20 million so thats absurd to talk about it. Across the board vs the rest of the power 5, $10 million is enough to COMPETE....the issue is Pikes is not the best talent evaluator in a win NOW and win in November/December type coach. He is a dinosaur with his style of play

the fact is though, the guys rutgers is getting in the portal will be better than the ones here besides Francis
 

RUfan1977

Senior
Mar 24, 2024
441
737
93
while I agree RU will still be in the bottom 6 grouping, they are still cutting the gap from what it was....RU spending $8-10 will still put them near schools like iowa and nebraska and maryland. RU will never spend 20 million so thats absurd to talk about it. Across the board vs the rest of the power 5, $10 million is enough to COMPETE....the issue is Pikes is not the best talent evaluator in a win NOW and win in November/December type coach. He is a dinosaur with his style of play

the fact is though, the guys rutgers is getting in the portal will be better than the ones here besides Francis
I remember last year when the proof that Pikiel didn’t know what he was doing was when he immediately went after Tariq Francis. Will admit Pikiel had a number of misses, but he’s also brought in quite a few very good under the radar players. Cam Spencer, Omoruyi, and of course Geo Baker come to mind. With money to work with, Pikiel should have a bigger pool of players to pick from. Tough choices ahead in deciding whether to go after a few high value players or more players who may be iffy.
 

richthedentist

All-American
Aug 2, 2001
10,993
8,539
113
We all remember what Geo, Ron, Myles, Cliff etc were as freshman. Not great. They got better each year. That’s what I see in this group. You can’t bring in freshman and then panic when they aren’t ready day 1. Especially given how Pike has struggled with wholesale roster changes in the NIL/portal era.
Unfortunately it’s the NIL era and whether or not you want to keep them together and develop them it’s just not happening in this day and age
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,212
176,876
113
I remember last year when the proof that Pikiel didn’t know what he was doing was when he immediately went after Tariq Francis. Will admit Pikiel had a number of misses, but he’s also brought in quite a few very good under the radar players. Cam Spencer, Omoruyi, and of course Geo Baker come to mind. With money to work with, Pikiel should have a bigger pool of players to pick from. Tough choices ahead in deciding whether to go after a few high value players or more players who may be iffy.
he went after Francis and struck gold yet even with that the team is just 12-18
 
  • Like
Reactions: dark_check

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,447
16,280
113
The bye means zippity-do-da. The real significance of tomorrow’s game is that a win will mean we won’t end the season with 20 losses. As far as keeping players, how quickly we forget how bad we are. Yes, we put up a fight at MSU in the second half..but we’ve mostly been playing Maryland without their bet two players and a crappy Penn State team. Have we improved? Yes, marginally, but we need upgrades at virtually every single position. The upside of most of these players is very limited.
 
Last edited:

bigbirdru

Junior
Mar 6, 2010
2,287
386
83
Unfortunately it’s the NIL era and whether or not you want to keep them together and develop them it’s just not happening in this day and age
I don’t think NIL is a reason we should lose anyone on this roster. Who on the roster is a power 4 team going to poach? Only reason someone should leave is more playing time
 

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,625
3,153
113
I remember last year when the proof that Pikiel didn’t know what he was doing was when he immediately went after Tariq Francis. Will admit Pikiel had a number of misses, but he’s also brought in quite a few very good under the radar players. Cam Spencer, Omoruyi, and of course Geo Baker come to mind. With money to work with, Pikiel should have a bigger pool of players to pick from. Tough choices ahead in deciding whether to go after a few high value players or more players who may be iffy.
I think you’re greatly downplaying the number of misses compared to the hits. Even a broken clock…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freddy Stubbs

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,625
3,153
113
We will be here next year discussing the bad information floating around that 10M is an actual budget, which is still 15th to 18th in the B1G and bottom 15% in Power 4 programs nationally.

You cannot win on a shoe string budget, 10M gets you a NCAA tournament starting 5, not a 13 player roster.

Just because someone posts bad information that cannot be verified like how much NIL money is there (which many RU fans somehow buy as legitimate), the names posted on the Round Table are 90% mid to low majors players.....who are productive.

Which is fine, but doesnt address the center position, which by itself, is a floor price of 1.75M to 3M.....not because the player is actually worth it, but they're limited in quantity and quality.

If 1 player costs 2M, 8 M for the rest is not a real budget folks.....not a bonafide one that can contend for a bid.

14M is the floor in the B1G, not 10M.....stop falling for bad information folks...
To set a floor is silly when you don’t know the real numbers either. Besides, player evaluation matters. 4mm is a big gap if you’re right but I’d rather have 11m and a good player evaluator as opposed to say 13m and a below avg talent evaluator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,640
38,120
113
Remember it’s not bring back at least five to start. It’s to be in rotatition.

Francis - start
Powers - start , first off bench
Buchanan - off bench
Zrno - off bench
Jmike - off bench
EO - off bench, not coming back
Mark - off bench, not coming nack
Nwuili - off bench, not coming back

GO RU

This. Even if they’re not starters, they’re going to be valuable backups, practice players and off court mentors. We can’t keep turning over 75% of our roster. Continuity matters.

I’d still want Grant back at a reasonable price point. Don’t forget about Dorian Jones, would want to see what he can actually do before parting ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NBKnight

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,640
38,120
113
You are assuming that Powers, Mark and Nwuli don't get any better from their freshman years. I really think Mark is going to be a definite BIG1G starter, maybe as early as next year. He is the most improved player from the beginning of the year to the end that I could ever remember. His game reminds me of Jacob Young's, and he didn't dramatically improve till the second half of his junior year. His shot is so much better. I know Richie claims he is gone, but that was before his big turn around. I am thinking he could definitely change his mind with a nice contract offer.

Powers has also shown considerable improvement, and who knows what his ceiling is. As another poster already mentioned, John Battle's improvement from freshman year to sophomore is legendary. There were a lot of people just like you who would say John would never become a NBA player after his freshman year, and I think Powers is a guy to bet on

Yeah, think you have to be bullish on powers as a sophomore and with a full year of college S&C. He’s got good size at 6 4, is a crafty passer and great form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Simce91 and Kbe4

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,640
38,120
113
while I agree RU will still be in the bottom 6 grouping, they are still cutting the gap from what it was....RU spending $8-10 will still put them near schools like iowa and nebraska and maryland. RU will never spend 20 million so thats absurd to talk about it. Across the board vs the rest of the power 5, $10 million is enough to COMPETE....the issue is Pikes is not the best talent evaluator in a win NOW and win in November/December type coach. He is a dinosaur with his style of play

the fact is though, the guys rutgers is getting in the portal will be better than the ones here besides Francis

Assuming Knight doesn’t get the Pitt job and stays, think you need to move TJ back to an administrative/operational role and get a new assistant. Love Pikes loyalty, but if he doesn’t make some staff changes, everyone is gonna be out of a job.
 

KnightTerrors

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2015
1,025
2,958
82
14M is the floor in the B1G, not 10M.....stop falling for bad information folks...
I’m not trying to be a jerk but I know for a fact this is not true for this season. Now admittedly you may know something I don’t about what prices will be for next season, but $10M would put you firmly in the middle of the pack this year. Certainly below the big boys but no where near the bottom.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,060
15,445
72
We will be here next year discussing the bad information floating around that 10M is an actual budget, which is still 15th to 18th in the B1G and bottom 15% in Power 4 programs nationally.

You cannot win on a shoe string budget, 10M gets you a NCAA tournament starting 5, not a 13 player roster.

Just because someone posts bad information that cannot be verified like how much NIL money is there (which many RU fans somehow buy as legitimate), the names posted on the Round Table are 90% mid to low majors players.....who are productive.

Which is fine, but doesnt address the center position, which by itself, is a floor price of 1.75M to 3M.....not because the player is actually worth it, but they're limited in quantity and quality.

If 1 player costs 2M, 8 M for the rest is not a real budget folks.....not a bonafide one that can contend for a bid.

14M is the floor in the B1G, not 10M.....stop falling for bad information folks...
If we were a 1-bid conference then I’d agree every team would need to spend $14+ million to compete for that top spot.

But with say, 8 teams from the B1G qualifying for the big dance, you could have a scenario like:

$12-15M has you vying for the top 4 spots
$9-12 has you vying for spots 5-8
$7-9M has you scrapping to overachieve into the top 8

I doubt any team will spend less than that lowest range. But even if every team spent the same amount, it’s still gonna come down to a combination of coaching and team chemistry.

You can buy expensive players, but they have to be the right mix of players under the direction of a good coach.

I can totally see a team from the lower budget range overachieving to crack the top 8 based on better chemistry and coaching.
 

RUgal

Senior
Oct 15, 2025
261
402
63
Assuming Knight doesn’t get the Pitt job and stays, think you need to move TJ back to an administrative/operational role and get a new assistant. Love Pikes loyalty, but if he doesn’t make some staff changes, everyone is gonna be out of a job.
I could see Pikiell bringing Hobbs back if Georgia Tech fires Stoudamire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

Friend of 112

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2007
1,020
1,296
113
I could see Pikiell bringing Hobbs back if Georgia Tech fires Stoudamire.

No No No GIF
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RUgal

Kbe4

Senior
Nov 25, 2025
461
465
63
This. Even if they’re not starters, they’re going to be valuable backups, practice players and off court mentors. We can’t keep turning over 75% of our roster. Continuity matters.

I’d still want Grant back at a reasonable price point. Don’t forget about Dorian Jones, would want to see what he can actually do before parting ways.
Grant is soft. We can do better.