The biggest overachiver in the conference this year is

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,722
5,502
113
Holloway has done an amazing job. As has Holtmann. But I have to give the nod to Villanova. Sure they were picked higher than DePaul or the Pirates. But their record is far superior than either of the other schools and to me that made the difference.

Now, if Nova loses to Xavier at home Saturday (unlikely) and the other two schools win their last game then maybe I change my mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HallX2

hbkmyr

Senior
Dec 29, 2009
2,250
438
83
Holloway has done an amazing job. As has Holtmann. But I have to give the nod to Villanova. Sure they were picked higher than DePaul or the Pirates. But their record is far superior than either of the other schools and to me that made the difference.

Now, if Nova loses to Xavier at home Saturday (unlikely) and the other two schools win their last game then maybe I change my mind.
Agreed it’s Villanova
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhishingPirate088

Buc Bloc

Redshirt
Sep 17, 2025
43
40
18
i'd say Depaul is finally playing to the talent they have. Good for them, 25 plus years of being terrible is unfathomable.

No one saw SH coming. 19 league games and we have topped everyone's expectations. Did anyone really think .500 was possible?

Nova too, but Nova is Nova and that means you can never really be an over achiever. Expectations are just different. It shows you how badly the former coach performed under pressure.

So, I say our Pirates win that going away.
 

Merge

Freshman
Nov 5, 2001
37
63
18
Gotta be Nova.

Picked 7th and only lost one BE game outside of UConn and SJU.
BE is down but that is still a hell of a year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhishingPirate088

Bud Boomer

All-Conference
Dec 24, 2007
623
1,804
93
Seton Hall in a landslide for me.

Nova is in consideration, but they have NIL and infrastructure. I actually thought Depaul would be knocking on the door of an NCAA bid. They have decent talent there, including some good returnees. I think I picked them 4th or 5th in the preseason.

We were 204th in kenpom last season (which is low major level), turned over an entire roster, and will finish around 50th.
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,082
1,083
113
Villanova 23-7 14-5
Seton Hall 20-10 10-9
DePaul 16-14 8-11

Someone else
Has to be us, no question IMO. Not only did we vastly exceed the preseason coaches poll, but even if the incoming talent was underestimated by most (likely because of last year and the on-paper pedigree), simply winning 10 league games and 20 games overall in the face of last year's disaster is the biggest overachievement/turnaround.
 

SPK145

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
1,144
2,537
113
Probably Villanova but Seton Hall wouldn't be far behind.
 
Last edited:

PiratePride

Junior
Jun 3, 2001
512
385
63
Seton Hall in a landslide for me.

Nova is in consideration, but they have NIL and infrastructure. I actually thought Depaul would be knocking on the door of an NCAA bid. They have decent talent there, including some good returnees. I think I picked them 4th or 5th in the preseason.

We were 204th in kenpom last season (which is low major level), turned over an entire roster, and will finish around 50th.
Agreed.....
Based on where we were at the end of last season and the low..... really low.... expectations for this season... my pick is SHU.
 

NittanyPirate

Junior
Feb 18, 2007
273
399
63
I’ll say Seton Hall. After last year’s dumpster fire and mass exodus I had almost zero interest in college basketball and no expectations for ‘25-26. The offseason portal haul didn’t inspire much hope.

Maui sucked me right back in and from there I haven’t missed much. It wasn’t a great winter, and college basketball isn’t near as fun for me, but I digress, our Pirates definitely out performed my expectations.
 

Piratz

All-Conference
Mar 24, 2004
1,331
2,627
113
Seton Hall in a landslide for me.

Nova is in consideration, but they have NIL and infrastructure. I actually thought Depaul would be knocking on the door of an NCAA bid. They have decent talent there, including some good returnees. I think I picked them 4th or 5th in the preseason.

We were 204th in kenpom last season (which is low major level), turned over an entire roster, and will finish around 50th.
Seconded.
 

Turiddu

Junior
Jun 3, 2001
82
267
53
My son was a broadcaster for NBC for a period of eleven years.He told me
that in interviewing coaches he made a mental note to remind himself that the coach knew a helluva lot more about the sport than him.It did not take away from his ability to ask tough qiuestions .Shaheen is not perfect, but there are comments about his knowledge of the game that are way off the mark.I think this team has overperformed ,and they play with his tenacious spirit.How you define the criteria for COY year determines who wins the award.If the criteria is who got the most with the least talent I would vote for Shaheen
 
May 12, 2009
661
346
63
My son was a broadcaster for NBC for a period of eleven years.He told me
that in interviewing coaches he made a mental note to remind himself that the coach knew a helluva lot more about the sport than him.It did not take away from his ability to ask tough qiuestions .Shaheen is not perfect, but there are comments about his knowledge of the game that are way off the mark.I think this team has overperformed ,and they play with his tenacious spirit.How you define the criteria for COY year determines who wins the award.If the criteria is who got the most with the least talent I would vote for Shaheen
I would also like to see what Pitino,Hurly and Willard would do with our roster.
 

sobo1

Senior
Oct 15, 2023
249
669
93
I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but it's important to put things into context. Nova spent $12M on this roster (per our Athletic Dept). Congratulations to Willard and Nova on a successful season, but your payroll is roughly double most the competition. This isn't rocket science - they swept all the teams that paid less than them and got swept by the teams that paid same or more than them. Give Sha an another $6M dollars to his budget and see what happens.

Willard is a very good coach and I'm happy for him, but leading a $12M roster to victories over $5M-$7M rosters doesn't impress me.
 

SPK145

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
1,144
2,537
113
I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but it's important to put things into context. Nova spent $12M on this roster (per our Athletic Dept). Congratulations to Willard and Nova on a successful season, but your payroll is roughly double most the competition. This isn't rocket science - they swept all the teams that paid less than them and got swept by the teams that paid same or more than them. Give Sha an another $6M dollars to his budget and see what happens.

Willard is a very good coach and I'm happy for him, but leading a $12M roster to victories over $5M-$7M rosters doesn't impress me.
Villanova did not spend $12 million.
 

HallX2

Senior
Mar 25, 2005
2,597
782
73
Holloway has done an amazing job. As has Holtmann. But I have to give the nod to Villanova. Sure they were picked higher than DePaul or the Pirates. But their record is far superior than either of the other schools and to me that made the difference.

Now, if Nova loses to Xavier at home Saturday (unlikely) and the other two schools win their last game then maybe I change my mind.
I have to say that you need to take into account the payroll. Nova is north of $10 million. Sheer turnaround belongs to us.
 

sobo1

Senior
Oct 15, 2023
249
669
93
Numbers I quoted were told to me by our athletic dept. nova 12, St. John’s 16.
 

Fishjam

All-Conference
Mar 27, 2016
666
2,331
93
Numbers I quoted were told to me by our athletic dept. nova 12, St. John’s 16.
That is what they had available or what they actually spent on their current roster? I could buy that is what they have available for next month's portal but those numbers seem high for Nova's current roster. $9M makes sense for their current roster
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halldan and Piratz

Fishjam

All-Conference
Mar 27, 2016
666
2,331
93
Seton Hall is the biggest overachiever. Not only did they only spend $5-6M, much of their money wasn't available early so they spent as much on their 8 bench players as their starting 5.

Willard did a good job but EVERY SINGLE expert, website, publication, media, etc had the Pirates finishing last in the Big East. It was widely seen as the worst talent in the BE.
 

Fishjam

All-Conference
Mar 27, 2016
666
2,331
93
Nope, nothing on how much a player is paid nor how much a program has in total.
Most believe that The Athletic's anonymous survey of coaches (below) is fairly accurate.

That says the Average Big East budget is $8 Million, P4 average is almost $9M.

Average estimated roster costs
ACC$8.2 million
Big East$8 million
Big Ten$8.5 million
Big 12$8.6 million
SEC$9.7 million
Mid-major plus$2.3 million
Low- to mid-major$525,000
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,082
1,083
113
I definitely believe they told you that but they do not have a good track record of being accurate or truthful when it comes to NIL/Revenue Share.
I’m surprised our athletic department didn’t say everyone in the Big East is $12m plus, so now all you super fans and supporters need to up your donation game more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhishingPirate088

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,722
5,502
113
Most believe that The Athletic's anonymous survey of coaches (below) is fairly accurate.

That says the Average Big East budget is $8 Million, P4 average is almost $9M.

Average estimated roster costs
ACC$8.2 million
Big East$8 million
Big Ten$8.5 million
Big 12$8.6 million
SEC$9.7 million
Mid-major plus$2.3 million
Low- to mid-major$525,000
Based on my sources that seems about right for the Big East. I might bump it up a smidgen.