Pope better land Stokes and a KILLER portal class.
Or what? BYU just got Dybantsa, Rob Wright, Keita and a returning Richie Saunders and have the same projected seed as that awful recruiter Mark Pope this season. Pope is fine, needs to do what works best for him.
NCAA Bracketology: 2026 March Madness men's field predictions
If Pope doesn't get the on-court results, sure, he will be fired.What do you mean, "Or What"?
Or the dude will get fired.
We have been at a major talent disadvantage all season long and our pending 2nd round exit will showcase that.
I'm glad to hear you are fine with the current direction of things but if you truly don't see the need for a massive talent upgrade, then idk what to tell you.
But Pope will not get a year 4 if things stay status quo.
If Pope doesn't get the on-court results, sure, he will be fired.
Championships can be built multiple different ways --- Bruce Branch, Tyran Stokes, etc are all just players. There's a lot of them out there and none of them are must-haves. None.
You posted Branch going to BYU and stated Pope better be getting somebody, ignoring the fact that BYU has the most talented team in the country and still is no better than Kentucky this season. That's all I'm saying...
You're forgetting that BYU is BYU and Kentucky is KentuckyOr what? BYU just got Dybantsa, Rob Wright, Keita and a returning Richie Saunders and have the same projected seed as that awful recruiter Mark Pope this season. Pope is fine, needs to do what works best for him.
NCAA Bracketology: 2026 March Madness men's field predictions
Or what? BYU just got Dybantsa, Rob Wright, Keita and a returning Richie Saunders and have the same projected seed as that awful recruiter Mark Pope this season. Pope is fine, needs to do what works best for him.
NCAA Bracketology: 2026 March Madness men's field predictions[/UNo one is going to take you seriously when you are already assuming we lose in the second round and make asinine definitive statements like "Pope will be fired if he doesn't recruit how I want him to." You know nothing and look stupid.What do you mean, "Or What"?
Or the dude will get fired.
We have been at a major talent disadvantage all season long and our pending 2nd round exit will showcase that.
I'm glad to hear you are fine with the current direction of things but if you truly don't see the need for a massive talent upgrade, then idk what to tell you.
But Pope will not get a year 4 if things stay status quo.
You're defeating your own argument and you don't even see it. I'm fine with agreeing to disagree, but if you can't see how:Yeah I'm not super worried about Kevin Smith and his coaching abilities with top talent, couldn't care less in fact.
But after watching every game of the Mark Pope era (most multiple times), it's very clear he needs to upgrade his talent.
So yes, we better land Stokes and/or some killers in the portal. Watching Pope lead another scrappy bunch of role players to a 6-seed is not my standard of excellence.
My statement stands.
No I'm not. I didn't compare Kentucky to BYU --- OP did. It's literally right up there, the whole thread.You're forgetting that BYU is BYU and Kentucky is Kentucky
I read the same news and insiders you do. I'm well aware. My point still stands.Is funny when I read “Pope needs to do what’s best for him” ATTENTION: Pope is not choosing to have a portal only class, he has offered tons of 5 stars the past two years and had no luck.
yep, mark pope with that roster goes to a final 4 easyOr what? BYU just got Dybantsa, Rob Wright, Keita and a returning Richie Saunders and have the same projected seed as that awful recruiter Mark Pope this season. Pope is fine, needs to do what works best for him.
NCAA Bracketology: 2026 March Madness men's field predictions
Is funny when I read “Pope needs to do what’s best for him” ATTENTION: Pope is not choosing to have a portal only class, he has offered tons of 5 stars the past two years and had no luck.
First of all, to the (self proclaimed village idiot), I never once said "BYU got a HS guy so Pope better get one". Literally never said that."BYU got a HS guy. Pope better get one"
1.) There's no such thing as an easy final four -- no matter what your roster is.yep, mark pope with that roster goes to a final 4 easy
You cannot imagine how much I don't care who BYU recruits.
I don't think everything is okay but I think your diagnosis for the issue is highly erroneous. And ive been pretty outspoken about A.) my dissatisfaction with the current results and B.) my diagnosis for it.First of all, to the (self proclaimed village idiot), I never once said "BYU got a HS guy so Pope better get one". Literally never said that.
My point was that we were recruiting this guy and trying to get him on campus as recently as 2 weeks ago and we struck out again on another talented player.
Pope better upgrade his talent.
And exactly @Tri-Countycat - Pope is trying HARD to land these dudes and cannot do it. But Village Idiot thinks everything is okay so let's just keep on keeping on.
I don't think everything is okay but I think your diagnosis for the issue is highly erroneous. And ive been pretty outspoken about A.) my dissatisfaction with the current results and B.) my diagnosis for it.
Kentucky hasn't been Kentucky in a long timeYou're forgetting that BYU is BYU and Kentucky is Kentucky
I reject the premise that lack of talent is this team's issue. And also, i don't give a damn about looking dumb. I'd rather be honest and provide critical analysis than say what looks good on a computer screen. I believe i've put in the work for my opinion to be backed up with good rationale and methodology. Our issues are far more complex than lack of talent. That's why we have the ability to win at Arkansas, beat a top 15 team in Vanderbilt badly, win two games versus Tennessee etc and yet still have head-scratching losses. I've been pretty consistent from the beginning of the year until now.So just to be clear, you DO NOT think we need to upgrade our talent? You think the level of talent on this team currently is good enough to win at the level that we expect?
It's a simple yes or no question.
If your answer is YES, then we have nothing more to discuss because it's insane for anyone to think the level of talent we have now is good enough.
If your answer is NO, then you agree with me, and your whole argument here looks pretty dumb.
I reject the premise that lack of talent is this team's issue. And also, i don't give a damn about looking dumb. I'd rather be honest and provide critical analysis than say what looks good on a computer screen. I believe i've put in the work for my opinion to be backed up with good rationale and methodology. Our issues are far more complex than lack of talent. That's why we have the ability to win at Arkansas, beat a top 15 team in Vanderbilt badly, win two games versus Tennessee etc and yet still have head-scratching losses. I've been pretty consistent from the beginning of the year until now.
well considering pope has done well with under talented teams, isnt it simple math to think hed to better with mo talent1.) There's no such thing as an easy final four -- no matter what your roster is.
2.) I reject the premise that the most "talent" wins to begin with, but the hypotheticals like that mean nothing. We have no idea how Pope would perform with imaginary rosters.
Huh? I said literally the opposite in the most candid way. All good though man, and you're right 99% of people agree with you, that part is true. lolGot it, so yes, we need a talent upgrade. Thank you, 99% of the fanbase agrees with that, so I'm glad you agree as well!
Having most likely 1 player who is All-SEC caliber on a $22 million roster is criminal.
Huh? I said literally the opposite in the most candid way. All good though man, and you're right 99% of people agree with you, that part is true. lol
No, it isn't. I have two examples from recent memory.well considering pope has done well with under talented teams, isnt it simple math to think hed to better with mo talent
I see you aren't trying to have a legitimate conversation, sir. You win whatever game you think you're playing. My post was expressly clear.Okay got it, so you DO NOT think we need to upgrade our talent?
Got it, I mean nothing more to discuss then. You are happy with the current level of talent.
the 25 team was made with diamonds in the rough, we hit on all of our transfers which doesnt happen much, also i dont put much stock in the s16 because all we did was win 2 tourney games in a mediocre regular season as wellNo, it isn't. I have two examples from recent memory.
Remember how the 2025 team was the 25th ranked portal class and we got a 3 seed, S16. Then, the next year, we added a top 15 HS class and the 2nd ranked portal class and we got worse?
Or do you remember how much worse we played with a projected 1st Rd NBA player? Other factors matter, such as injuries, roster continuity, minutes continuity, chemistry, positional fit, defined roles, etc.
I see you aren't trying to have a legitimate conversation, sir. You win whatever game you think you're playing. My post was expressly clear.
For the last decade, every single national champion had a top 10 high school recruiting class that year, right?the 25 team was made with diamonds in the rough, we hit on all of our transfers which doesnt happen much, also i dont put much stock in the s16 because all we did was win 2 tourney games in a mediocre regular season as well
this team had a way worse portal class, and we only had 2 difference making returners
AND STILL have an okay record, so yes i firmly believe with more talent wed be much better
no one said that, + those programs rhat won have a different coach than ours so their formula doesnt have to be like oursFor the last decade, every single national champion had a top 10 high school recruiting class that year, right?
That's because we all know the answer. Zero champs in the last decade even had a top 10 high school recruiting class. Literally zero but its the most important thing on the planet and if you don't agree that it's literally the answer to every question, it must mean you don't know anything. At least that's how y'all talk to me.no one said that, + those programs rhat won have a different coach than ours so their formula doesnt have to be like ours
keep in mind out of our 10 losses this season, i cant attribute a single one of them to being outcoached, but being out talented
i mean scheyer hasnt won the whole thing but hes done excellent with young guys, maybe thats the approach pope needs to take, weve seen two years of older guys with no talent so why keep doing the same thing and hope for different resultsThat's because we all know the answer. Zero champs in the last decade even had a top 10 high school recruiting class. Literally zero but its the most important thing on the planet and if you don't agree that it's literally the answer to every question, it must mean you don't know anything. At least that's how y'all talk to me.
RR: Hey, Idiot. You don't know high school players are the beginning and end of everything in basketball.
Me: Yeah, but for a full decade, none of the champions even had a top 10 high school class.
RR: Look at this idiot. He likes being a 6 seed.
What the hell kind of logic is this? ^^^ And why am I the unsensible one when it comes to this topic? lol its almost hilarious.
If you ever want to be objective, pull your own team from the pool of data. Otherwise, you open yourself up to bias.i mean scheyer hasnt won the whole thing but hes done excellent with young guys, maybe thats the approach pope needs to take, weve seen two years of older guys with no talent so why keep doing the same thing and hope for different results
How about what is best for us?Or what? BYU just got Dybantsa, Rob Wright, Keita and a returning Richie Saunders and have the same projected seed as that awful recruiter Mark Pope this season. Pope is fine, needs to do what works best for him.
NCAA Bracketology: 2026 March Madness men's field predictions
Semantic game.How about what is best for us?
i mean theres a WHOLE video from sleepers media talking about how winning with mid players is one thing but NOT winning with mid players is something else, not to mention the fact we have 0 commits for next seasonIf you ever want to be objective, pull your own team from the pool of data. Otherwise, you open yourself up to bias.
And yes, I think Scheyer is an outstanding coach. This year he has a roster that can win it all. But I gave you a full decade of championship teams. Why do none of them have a top 10 high school class and yet its the most important thing on the planet? That's 1+1=potato type of logic right there.