3rd two years ago!Didn’t you win some national bracket contest or entry? Maybe they should hire you…can’t mess up any more than the actual committee and you seem to have a better than average grasp on all this stuff.
3rd two years ago!Didn’t you win some national bracket contest or entry? Maybe they should hire you…can’t mess up any more than the actual committee and you seem to have a better than average grasp on all this stuff.
Agreed, the only contingency is if they beat Purdue, the other win probably needs to be PSU. Can't afford to have a bad loss at this stage to go with one Quad 1 win0-9 now in Quad 1 games...similar to UNC last year without the name power 7-10 in Q1/2, 11-10 in Q1/2/3
they do have 3 wins vs teams in the field..Wisky, UCLA, USC (barely in)
no bad losses so its a clean profile..might actually compare favorably to USC when it comes down to it
I think if they 3 win of 4..at Iowa, Purd, Indiana, at PSU they get in...2 if Purdue is one of them will look pretty good
the bubble is really small and bad this year
That OSU/Indiana to close out the regular season is going to have massive tourney implications. It could possibly be a win-and-in for both teamsIndiana lost.
Yeah i think they had something similar in years past if not last year when neither got inThat OSU/Indiana to close out the regular season is going to have massive tourney implications. It could possibly be a win-and-in for both teams
OSU likely now has a Q1 win, so that result really helps the Buckeyes
I believe lock no question even if their resume is poorIf Miami OH goes undefeated regular season but loses in their conference tourney, are they in?
Lol Akron? noIf the Zips lose in the final of the MAC do they steal a bid?
Are you back..gimme a signYale? Do you miss questions about WAB?
Cold turkey. Back to look at snow threads and take a peak hereAre you back..gimme a sign
good to see, its tumbleweeds around here and its going to get worse next seasonCold turkey. Back to look at snow threads and take a peak here
Cold turkey. Back to look at snow threads and take a peak here
I haven't watched a second of college basketball since the BYU-Alabama game in the NCAA tournament.Well that might be the best news on the basketball side since the site roll over. I barely look at the bracketology update thread because I find our situation too depressing. Glad I decided to glance at it this AM though. Welcome back.
How bout an RIP specialty post on the state of the defense for old times sake? I find it head scratching how bad we are at D. Didn’t think we’d be great, but also didn’t think we’d be historically bad. Curious on your take.
I haven't watched a second of college basketball since the BYU-Alabama game in the NCAA tournament.
Tell me if there are rule changes,......NCAA offensive efficiency was 1.067 PPP last year and is 1.095 PPP this year. It has been ticking up every year, but not an increase like this year.
JUST WATCH THE NBA....at least you have roster continuity.
Posts like this reinforces my decision....
That’s fine. But in my opinion it should probably only be cut and dry like this for 3 spots on the roster.
1) Francis (must be paid starter dollars 1.5 M). 500K budgeted for whoever backs him up (whether that’s Lino or J Mike).
2) Center (we have to pay over 2M for this). Then pay Ogbole the back up rate.
3) I want a two way forward who sees the floor well and can handle the ball for starter number 3. In our price range this player won’t be efficient (think Caleb). I don’t care. 1.2 M for this role.
Beyond this, I see it as a flat out competition. We are offering the high end of the “back up” range to several guys who all have a chance to start. Powers 750k, Zrno 750k, Buchanan (closer to $1M probably because he plays multiple positions), Grant I would be offering in similar range as Buchanan but he might not be happy with that. Just looking at his paper numbers a team might offer him 1.3M based on his size. I don’t think personally think he’s worth that because of his defense. I think the goal would be to target - couple additional proven low-major kids to compete with these guys. Maybe keep Dortch as a utility if he’s cheap.
To your point about offensive efficiency, I would imagine as more coaches eliminate long 2-pointers and opt for shots at the rim and behind the arc only, this trend will continue. Pike is one of a dying breed regarding that.I haven't watched a second of college basketball since the BYU-Alabama game in the NCAA tournament.
Tell me if there are rule changes,......NCAA offensive efficiency was 1.067 PPP last year and is 1.095 PPP this year. It has been ticking up every year, but not an increase like this year.
JUST WATCH THE NBA....at least you have roster continuity.
Posts like this reinforces my decision....
That’s fine. But in my opinion it should probably only be cut and dry like this for 3 spots on the roster.
1) Francis (must be paid starter dollars 1.5 M). 500K budgeted for whoever backs him up (whether that’s Lino or J Mike).
2) Center (we have to pay over 2M for this). Then pay Ogbole the back up rate.
3) I want a two way forward who sees the floor well and can handle the ball for starter number 3. In our price range this player won’t be efficient (think Caleb). I don’t care. 1.2 M for this role.
Beyond this, I see it as a flat out competition. We are offering the high end of the “back up” range to several guys who all have a chance to start. Powers 750k, Zrno 750k, Buchanan (closer to $1M probably because he plays multiple positions), Grant I would be offering in similar range as Buchanan but he might not be happy with that. Just looking at his paper numbers a team might offer him 1.3M based on his size. I don’t think personally think he’s worth that because of his defense. I think the goal would be to target - couple additional proven low-major kids to compete with these guys. Maybe keep Dortch as a utility if he’s cheap.
We have seen a gradual uptick every year (your explanation is reason). This year is a much bigger move up (guessing it is an effort thing).To your point about offensive efficiency, I would imagine as more coaches eliminate long 2-pointers and opt for shots at the rim and behind the arc only, this trend will continue. Pike is one of a dying breed regarding that.
Plus, like the NBA, it seems like every position player can take and make 3 pointers these days (except at RU of course).
snow....but i have looked every once in awhile. I think Pike has no interest in the way the game is today. Add to that he has no ammunition.Well, you decided to take the time to set up an account on a discussion forum about a sport you haven’t watched in almost a year so there’s that…. I’m not sure what made you check in, but I figured if we ever heard from you again it would probably be before a coaching change was made.
You like Pike. You appreciate that he likes to win the way you like to win - through defense, which as you alluded to, is becoming rarer and rarer - a dying breed. Pike tried to resurrect his defensive identity this season but there were just too many holes to fill in starting from scratch after “selling his soul” with the type of recruiting he did around Ace and Dylan. You called it back then. Nobody else listened. I hope you’ll stick around and watch Pike fight through the hot seat pitch forks next season to restore his defensive identity. To your point, it might be the last chance you’ll get to root for your team attempting to play the style of the game that you want to see. I guess that’s my case for why you should come back now. The train wreck his D has become this season. It has to be killing Pike. But I’m telling you, my view is it could be drastically fixed by addressing a few major defensive holes. Two key additions and continued development. Im convinced many of the guys on the current team are improving despite our results. That’s where I was interested in your perspective. Maybe I can convince you to watch a game or two… maybe not.
The contrarian in you probably would’ve liked Tariq this season, by the way. Everyone hated on the kid like he was some kind of disease all pre-season (me included), and we still have a collection of fans who won’t admit he’s any good. He’s, in your words, a “willing defender” despite his size limitations, and not a selfish player despite being the best scorer on the team by far.
This is how all the one bid conferences should do their tournaments.
snow....but i have looked every once in awhile. I think Pike has no interest in the way the game is today. Add to that he has no ammunition.
me leaving has nothing to do with not winning.
I will say Myles and Cliff was the backbone of our successful squads. No Myles no NCAAs. Most important player to put on a Rutgers uniform in the past 40+ years
Big trouble..not completely done because of how atrocious the bubble isUSC should be done.