Hope Iron Maiden gets in and tells them to shove it.Phil Collins, Mariah Carey, Lauryn Hill, INXS, Iron Maiden, Luther Vandross, Shakira, Melissa Etheridge, Jeff Buckley, Pink, New Edition, Sade, the Wu-Tang Clan, the Black Crowes, Oasis, Joy Division/New Order and Billy Idol
Every year this comes out, and every year I'm amazed that Boomers and Gen X dudes still don't get the meaning of the Billy Joel song. . .
Nope. I guess the Hall don't remember them.Funny seeing these names nominated and yet the Carpenters aren’t in or nominated?
![]()
Why have Boston, Styx, The Scorpions and a long list of other rock n' roll stalwarts either never been nominated or not in, while new artists that are barely in genre, as opposed to artists squarely in the genre, get passed over? THAT is the point.
Funny seeing these names nominated and yet the Carpenters aren’t in or nominated?
Phil Collins, Mariah Carey, Lauryn Hill, INXS, Iron Maiden, Luther Vandross, Shakira, Melissa Etheridge, Jeff Buckley, Pink, New Edition, Sade, the Wu-Tang Clan, the Black Crowes, Oasis, Joy Division/New Order and Billy Idol
Okay while I was NEVER a fan of NON-rock acts being inducted, in the1st place, here we go:Phil Collins, Mariah Carey, Lauryn Hill, INXS, Iron Maiden, Luther Vandross, Shakira, Melissa Etheridge, Jeff Buckley, Pink, New Edition, Sade, the Wu-Tang Clan, the Black Crowes, Oasis, Joy Division/New Order and Billy Idol
I still think you are missing the point.Because it's not really a genre.
It's just "rock n roll." It's all rock n roll, in the sense of the inception of innovative musical trends and era-defining popular music that pushed boundaries, had cultural significance, and redefined what popular music was. Superstar musical staying power for the time.
"New wave, dance craze, anyways, its still rock n roll to me..." not that those genres are literally rock n roll, but that it's just another teenaged fad and the latest popular thing, as rock n roll was in the 50s when it came out. The cycle repeats, as Billy said, and made reference to discussing whatever was trending at the time. It's just the same rock n roll cycle that began with generational proclivities for new musical styles intertwined with popular culture.
Beyond that initial 50s genre, "rock music" isn't per se rock n roll....what bc guitars are used rather than a piano or drum machine? They all are on 4/4 rythims, have essentially a bass, melody, rythim, and vocal section, etc. The earliest rock n roll sounded like bluesy jazzy guitar riffing with a more repetitive and consistent rythim. That's a far cry from later fusions and innovations. What are the beastie boys more rock n roll than Steely Dan bc they employ more aggressive vocals and loud guitar samples?
It's about popular music and culture as it changes through the years, it's not about rock music, i.e. songs with electric guitar and a certain amplitude. I understand why some might interpret it that way, but it isn't the way the hall has interpreted it.
Ice Cube said it well: "Rock & roll is not an instrument, rock & roll is not even a style of music. Rock & roll is a spirit. Are we rock n roll? Damn right we are rock n roll." That is not the same thing as him saying "we make rock music" or "we are a rock band."
I see you like to Rock the Cradle of Love. . . . . .Okay while I was NEVER a fan of NON-rock acts being inducted, in the1st place, here we go:
Collins is already in with Genesis. Why waste a vote here?
Carey - probably deserves it
Hill - nope
INXS - borderline but no
Iron Maiden - ehhhhh I think so but do they make the cut?
Vandross - man, love Luther, but I don't think he makes it
Shakira - nope (but would be in over Pink IMHO)
Pink - nope
New Edition - YES
Sade - nope
Wu-Tang - YES
Black Crowes - for the LOVE OF GOD NOOOOOO
Oasis - yuck, but YES
Joy Division/New Order - if you understand what they did for music (Post Punk AND the rave scene (watch "24-Hour Party People)) you have to say YES
Billy Idol - 10000% YES
Because it's not really a genre.
It's just "rock n roll." It's all rock n roll, in the sense of the inception of innovative musical trends and era-defining popular music that pushed boundaries, had cultural significance, and redefined what popular music was. Superstar musical staying power for the time.
"New wave, dance craze, anyways, its still rock n roll to me..." not that those genres are literally rock n roll, but that it's just another teenaged fad and the latest popular thing, as rock n roll was in the 50s when it came out. The cycle repeats, as Billy said, and made reference to discussing whatever was trending at the time. It's just the same rock n roll cycle that began with generational proclivities for new musical styles intertwined with popular culture.
Beyond that initial 50s genre, "rock music" isn't per se rock n roll....what bc guitars are used rather than a piano or drum machine? They all are on 4/4 rythims, have essentially a bass, melody, rythim, and vocal section, etc. The earliest rock n roll sounded like bluesy jazzy guitar riffing with a more repetitive and consistent rythim. That's a far cry from later fusions and innovations. What are the beastie boys more rock n roll than Steely Dan bc they employ more aggressive vocals and loud guitar samples?
It's about popular music and culture as it changes through the years, it's not about rock music, i.e. songs with electric guitar and a certain amplitude. I understand why some might interpret it that way, but it isn't the way the hall has interpreted it.
Ice Cube said it well: "Rock & roll is not an instrument, rock & roll is not even a style of music. Rock & roll is a spirit. Are we rock n roll? Damn right we are rock n roll." That is not the same thing as him saying "we make rock music" or "we are a rock band."
Forget about the fact they're not "Rock" for a hot second. You and I are in the same age bracket...they were HUGE at the time...then brought about Brown (as a solo act) and the Bell, Biv, Devoe spinoff...which is why I think they get in (but could be wrong, of course...).New Edition is a joke
Thats a subjective opinion regarding entry though, not an objective categorical hurdle to being nominated.I still think you are missing the point.
There are far more deserving musicians that have been passed over or ignored than Pink, Sade, WTC, Lauryn Hill and Shakira. Note that I did not include Luther Vandross. I have removed New Edition from my list-they were around for a long time. Scorpions were recording music for 10 years before Lauryn Hill was born in 1975, and before Shakira was born in 1977.
Some good points, I would disagree on a few of those. You are right in that popular music is constantly evolving and “rock music” is a broad concept with limited rules. However, R&R has been considered a major genre of music since the 1950’s. At that time along with blues/country-western/folk (all related) , jazz and classical. R&R evolved out of blues and country-western with a faster tempo and a backbeat (drums). It was a dance oriented music originally. Part of R&R is about “spirit” or “attitude”. But It’s not just about that at all. Over the decades, jazz and classical influences have been added. All music is certainly subjective regarding personal taste. I do think that over the last 15 yrs or so there have been inductees into the R&RHOF which don’t fit the genre at all imo. For the record, I like Steely Dan a hell of a lot better than The Beastie Boys (musically that isn’t close). Of this year’s nominees, I like The Black Crowes and INXS. I think they are outstanding rock bands.
I would think Britney will be eligible soon along with Backstreet Boys and N SyncHow come no Britney Spears or Justin Bieber?
I disagree. For years, the Hall as pissed all over hard rock, metal and hair metal bands (see Maiden and Scorpions, Motorhead), while admitting acts that are not "rock music", and I get your nuance about "rock n roll." For years, the guy who was anti hard rock and metal is that putz Jan Wenner. The same case could be made for legions of punk ROCK bands- Black Flag, The Bad Brains, Bad Religion, The Descendents and many others are highly influential artists that influenced bands that have long been in the Hall.Very good post.
Just for clarification - I don't think that rock music is necessarily broad enough to encompass many of these acts, but I do think the term "rock n roll" as more of the cultural phenomenon that Billy Joel was alluding to in his song, is the direction/umbrella the hall is considering, as a cultural/musical phenomenon rather than a specific music genre. That's why I referenced the song in my first comment.
their impact wasnt all that great on the pop chartsForget about the fact they're not "Rock" for a hot second. You and I are in the same age bracket...they were HUGE at the time...then brought about Brown (as a solo act) and the Bell, Biv, Devoe spinoff...which is why I think they get in (but could be wrong, of course...).
I disagree. For years, the Hall as pissed all over hard rock, metal and hair metal bands (see Maiden and Scorpions, Motorhead), while admitting acts that are not "rock music", and I get your nuance about "rock n roll." For years, the guy who was anti hard rock and metal is that putz Jan Wenner. The same case could be made for legions of punk ROCK bands- Black Flag, The Bad Brains, Bad Religion, The Descendents and many others are highly influential artists that influenced bands that have long been in the Hall.
But kitschy acts such at Shakira and Pink get a nod. Sade- had one hit song? With that said, some of us purists consider the whole thing a farce.
Sade had more than one hit songI disagree. For years, the Hall as pissed all over hard rock, metal and hair metal bands (see Maiden and Scorpions, Motorhead), while admitting acts that are not "rock music", and I get your nuance about "rock n roll." For years, the guy who was anti hard rock and metal is that putz Jan Wenner. The same case could be made for legions of punk ROCK bands- Black Flag, The Bad Brains, Bad Religion, The Descendents and many others are highly influential artists that influenced bands that have long been in the Hall.
But kitschy acts such at Shakira and Pink get a nod. Sade- had one hit song? With that said, some of us purists consider the whole thing a farce.
Uhmmm....Candy Girl? Boyz to Men? Com'on you don't remember these songs?i dont th
their impact wasnt all that great on the pop charts
5 hit songs and 2 of them from mid 90s reboot that i have no idea what they were
only ones i know
Mr Telephone Man
Cool It Now
If It Isnt Love
sorry hard pass and I was not listening to New Editon as a tween bac
For me it's similar to the ripping off of the term "Reggae" by the Reggaeton crowd. One has nothing to do with the other.
If they had the slightest bit of honesty the people doing the nominating would either change the name of the place to The Popular Music Hall Of Fame or stop nominating musicians that have zero to do with Rock and Roll.
Rock and Roll, like Reggae, has a certain cachet that some want to adopt in an attempt to broaden their audience...I guess.
I've been listening to rock and roll for about 65 years. I know what rock and roll is. Mariah Carey and Shakira are not rock and roll.
The people that run that thing called The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame know that. Change the name to what it really is.