Realistically, How Quickly Can We Move On From Sha?

BrklynGrad

Freshman
Feb 1, 2026
136
82
28
The team and coach have over achieved this year. Pre season posters predicted seven BE wins, and I thought they were crazy.
Expectations through early January grew ridiculously high. Are the team's offensive woes due to its lack of talent or the coaching scheme? On another note, for the rest of the season Himes needs to play the bulk of the time at center. I like Payne a lot, but two scoreless games tell the tale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: batts

Hall Is Life

Senior
Oct 15, 2019
330
492
63
While I get the frustration, this talk of moving on from Sha is simply a waste of time; for a school that cannot compete financially now, imagine adding the anchor of a contract buy out to that? That would set the next coach, and the program, back at least 3 years. And what coach is coming here knowing we will have less resources then we have now...and we don't have the talent to compete now???

It is what it is...that is college (word used VERY loosely) basketball today, and unless you have unlimited resources, you move from season to season, starting anew.

The only way the school even remotely considers moving on is they run his contract out, or convince him it is best for all parties that he moves on. They can probably be jerks and do this simply by cutting his NIL budget...in which case, if I am him, I wouldn't want to be here either.
Word has it he spent $6M on this roster. Imagine if he targeted talent instead of depth? With a different approach, he could absolutely compete. I don't want to hear that UConn spends X and St. John's spends Y. $6M is a lot of money and he's got to use it wisely. Horses. He needs horses. Oh and Felt said that he will be upping the ante to remain in the middle of the pack. So how is it that we get swept by DePaul and lay yet another egg in a must-win game? Coaching perhaps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09 and SHUS1516

King of S

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2017
3,406
2,753
113
the quality of play, the style of play, and the majority of the teams we play are all just bad. Ticket prices aren’t cheap, food is not cheap, parking is not cheap compared to the entertainment value you get. How much do you want to pay to watch us get down early and miss 15 layups a game?
Bingo - really tough to watch last night. Big spend for not much entertainment.
 

hbkmyr

Senior
Dec 29, 2009
2,261
456
83
The team and coach have over achieved this year. Pre season posters predicted seven BE wins, and I thought they were crazy.
Expectations through early January grew ridiculously high. Are the team's offensive woes due to its lack of talent or the coaching scheme? On another note, for the rest of the season Himes needs to play the bulk of the time at center. I like Payne a lot, but two scoreless games tell the tale.
Have they really overachieved? 7 of their league wins have come against the worst teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09

JTSHU

Senior
Feb 9, 2015
540
466
63
Word has it he spent $6M on this roster. Imagine if he targeted talent instead of depth? With a different approach, he could absolutely compete. I don't want to hear that UConn spends X and St. John's spends Y. $6M is a lot of money and he's got to use it wisely. Horses. He needs horses. Oh and Felt said that he will be upping the ante to remain in the middle of the pack. So how is it that we get swept by DePaul and lay yet another egg in a must-win game? Coaching perhaps?
The bottom guys dont cost much anyway. U still need a bench
 

NYC Pirate

Senior
Nov 11, 2007
650
616
92
I believe the answer is both. Far exceeded my expectations. Sight unseen I thought if everything clicked we could win 7 BigEast games. The first half against SJU at MSG was excellent. Unfortunately, they screwed it up. I thought they went toe to toe against UConn except for one segment of the game. On the other hand they came very close to getting swept by both DePaul and Butler, with two lackluster home games on top of that?????
 

NYC Pirate

Senior
Nov 11, 2007
650
616
92
We’re mediocre. 8-8. 0-4 against the good teams and, again, lost two HOME games by double digits to a 5-10 team and a 6-9 team.

Why we’re out. Disappointing. But deserved.
They better beat GTown because there is now a realistic chance that DePaul could pass The Hall for 5th place. They probably need 2 wins or that may happen. Beyond disappointing. I still hold out hope they beat GTown, Xavier and SJU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silkcity Pirate

Piratz

All-Conference
Mar 24, 2004
1,370
2,721
113
Our starting center put up a goose egg.

we also have come to learn throughout the season that he is apparently one of highest paid players if not be highest.

that can’t happen if that’s where your resources are being spent.
Second straight with 0.

He struggles mightily. Plays offense like his feet are in cinder blocks. He’s not strong with the ball in traffic, hesitates way too much.

But Sha loves his type of profile: defense-first, physical. Offense optional.
 

BrklynGrad

Freshman
Feb 1, 2026
136
82
28
Have they really overachieved? 7 of their league wins have come against the worst teams
Compared to 2-18 last year?
Word has it he spent $6M on this roster. Imagine if he targeted talent instead of depth? With a different approach, he could absolutely compete. I don't want to hear that UConn spends X and St. John's spends Y. $6M is a lot of money and he's got to use it wisely. Horses. He needs horses. Oh and Felt said that he will be upping the ante to remain in the middle of the pack. So how is it that we get swept by DePaul and lay yet another egg in a must-win game? Coaching perhaps?
Could it be the same issue as before NIL: lots of kids just don't want to come here if they can go elsewhere?
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu67

Section112

Senior
Feb 4, 2003
344
816
93
This years group is better than last years no question but that is not over achieving. They are completely different rosters.
I think we have to give it one more year. This is premature. As disappointing as it is, we did improve a lot compared to last year.

The big question going into next year will be can we retain our good players and build something here and add new talent? In spite of NIL and the portal, our only shot is we have some continuity and upper classman leadership to help us win games. If we lose our good players again, something has to change with our coach and AD IMO and how the program is run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYC Pirate

Bud Boomer

All-Conference
Dec 24, 2007
664
1,950
93
Second straight with 0.

He struggles mightily. Plays offense like his feet are in cinder blocks. He’s not strong with the ball in traffic, hesitates way too much.

But Sha loves his type of profile: defense-first, physical. Offense optional.
He looks hurt to me. He had more offensive rebounds against Marquette than he’s had in the entire month of February. The burst just isn’t there anymore. Slow to rotate. Leaving his feet on every pump fake.

All the more bizarre that Shaheen doesn’t just ride Najai into the ground, but I’m getting tired of making that point. It is what it is
 

Hall Is Life

Senior
Oct 15, 2019
330
492
63
Could it be the same issue as before NIL: lots of kids just don't want to come here if they can go elsewhere?
This Week In The Big East podcast interviewed KJ Lewis last week and he was asked what brought him to Georgetown. He said it was his immediate connection with Cooley. Come on! 😂

The correct and obvious answer would have been "they offered me the most money."

Sha lost Tyrese Samuel over a couple dollars when NIL first hit the scene. Laughed in his face even. I think he's come around to understanding that these guys are commanding big money, but it's his model that's handicapping him. He wants to play 10 guys. Realistically, you need 7-8 guys and hope to avoid the injury bug. See: Kadary, Dre, Dawes (Sha's best year). Sprinkle in a diamond in the rough like Bediako and he was cooking. They all stayed healthy (minus General Soreness) and we would have made the dance had it not been for an obscene amount of bid stealers.
 

Bud Boomer

All-Conference
Dec 24, 2007
664
1,950
93
This Week In The Big East podcast interviewed KJ Lewis last week and he was asked what brought him to Georgetown. He said it was his immediate connection with Cooley. Come on! 😂

The correct and obvious answer would have been "they offered me the most money."

Sha lost Tyrese Samuel over a couple dollars when NIL first hit the scene. Laughed in his face even. I think he's come around to understanding that these guys are commanding big money, but it's his model that's handicapping him. He wants to play 10 guys. Realistically, you need 7-8 guys and hope to avoid the injury bug. See: Kadary, Dre, Dawes (Sha's best year). Sprinkle in a diamond in the rough like Bediako and he was cooking. They all stayed healthy (minus General Soreness) and we would have made the dance had it not been for an obscene amount of bid stealers.
Shaheen has shown that he will abandon the 10-man rotation when he doesn’t have the horses for it. The NIT team had a short rotation. Even now, Shaheen is not playing the bench nearly as much as before.

My hope for next year is that he prioritizes retaining the 3 clear keepers and then adjusts his strategy based on the amount he has left over.
 

hbkmyr

Senior
Dec 29, 2009
2,261
456
83
We were rated pre-season worse than ALL thse teams we beat. That is over-achieving.
I think we take these preseason polls as gospel more often than not. Just because the coaches thought something doesnt mean its true. So yes, we are over achieving based on what the coaches thought in september, we are under achieving based on what the pollsters thought when we were ranked as a top 25 team ..
 

shu67

Senior
Jun 12, 2021
731
518
93
If he is going with the same game plan next year it will be his last. Recruit small players who will execute his defense plans and can't shoot long range will be his demise. You can't win much with a small team that can't make 3 pointers. Can't make free throws and have trouble rebounding.
 

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
317
276
63
He’s had 3 top 60 Kenpom teams in 4 years.

The new standard of excellence ladies & gentlemen. Like LT once famously said, "Whipty damn do!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09

NYShoreGuy

Senior
Jan 7, 2006
1,783
856
113
If he is going with the same game plan next year it will be his last. Recruit small players who will execute his defense plans and can't shoot long range will be his demise. You can't win much with a small team that can't make 3 pointers. Can't make free throws and have trouble rebounding.
People here harp on defense but is it really that great? If the goal is to force least amount of points for the opponent and not give them perimeter looks it certainly does not add up
 
Jun 3, 2001
238
334
63
Word has it he spent $6M on this roster. Imagine if he targeted talent instead of depth? With a different approach, he could absolutely compete. I don't want to hear that UConn spends X and St. John's spends Y. $6M is a lot of money and he's got to use it wisely. Horses. He needs horses. Oh and Felt said that he will be upping the ante to remain in the middle of the pack. So how is it that we get swept by DePaul and lay yet another egg in a must-win game? Coaching perhaps?
but we are middle of the pack; 5 out of 11....actually slightly better...
 
Jun 3, 2001
238
334
63
There is no excuse for a player not being in shape on a basketball team as people are saying about Hines; must work harder!
then again....maybe that is why/how we got him?

If he was a ready-made player of his size and skills....would probably have been out of our price range. Reminds me of when/how we got Myles Powell
 
  • Like
Reactions: Left Coast Pirates
Feb 6, 2019
250
570
93
People here harp on defense but is it really that great? If the goal is to force least amount of points for the opponent and not give them perimeter looks it certainly does not add up
This isn’t a fair or accurate take.

In conference play we lead the BE in points allowed per game. 67.6

we also surrender the 6th most 3 point attempts per game while holding our opponents to the second lowest FG % on those attempts 32.1%

the issue is we only score 67.4 ppg.

The margin for error is unfortunately razor thin. Basically in line with a team that is 8-8 in league play.
 

Piratz

All-Conference
Mar 24, 2004
1,370
2,721
113
He looks hurt to me. He had more offensive rebounds against Marquette than he’s had in the entire month of February. The burst just isn’t there anymore. Slow to rotate. Leaving his feet on every pump fake.

All the more bizarre that Shaheen doesn’t just ride Najai into the ground, but I’m getting tired of making that point. It is what it is
Great point. The OR drop off is striking.

And Lord knows they’re available with this team!
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu67

Piratz

All-Conference
Mar 24, 2004
1,370
2,721
113
People here harp on defense but is it really that great? If the goal is to force least amount of points for the opponent and not give them perimeter looks it certainly does not add up
It’s good enough to win and be an NCAA Tournament team for sure. It is a very good defense. Now, it’s more based on pressure and gambling and disruption – why we have issues with over-help, grabbing, and leaving our feet – but it’s a very good unit.

You simply cannot pair it with an offense that is so inept. We are WAY too reliant on that defense getting us extra possessions. I mean we’re 295th in 3PT% (363rd in 3PA:FGA), 292nd in 2PT% and also 204th in FT%. It’s awful. That isn’t good enough to be an NIT team, let alone the NCAAT.

And thus our misery. So close, yet so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu67

Hall Is Life

Senior
Oct 15, 2019
330
492
63
Shaheen has shown that he will abandon the 10-man rotation when he doesn’t have the horses for it. The NIT team had a short rotation. Even now, Shaheen is not playing the bench nearly as much as before.

My hope for next year is that he prioritizes retaining the 3 clear keepers and then adjusts his strategy based on the amount he has left over.
Now imagine if he didn't spread his budget around with the wish that he can find 10 Big East basketball players and instead focused on only 7-8 guys? Enough with the SPU MAAC model. We've all said it. It will not work at this level. So instead of shortening his rotation to 7-8 capable players, he has guys like Parker (not a pg) and Dar (not a PF) coming off the bench.
but we are middle of the pack; 5 out of 11....actually slightly better...
This is exactly what I said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bud Boomer
Jun 3, 2001
238
334
63
Now imagine if he didn't spread his budget around with the wish that he can find 10 Big East basketball players and instead focused on only 7-8 guys? Enough with the SPU MAAC model. We've all said it. It will not work at this level. So instead of shortening his rotation to 7-8 capable players, he has guys like Parker (not a pg) and Dar (not a PF) coming off the bench.

This is exactly what I said.
With a middle of the pack budget....so, a fair result I think
 

Hall Is Life

Senior
Oct 15, 2019
330
492
63
With a middle of the pack budget....so, a fair result I think
So you believe our budget should dictate our place in the standings? We're neither rich nor poor. Either we have the coach who can navigate this or we don't. If he can't do it, find somebody who can.
 

SHUS1516

Redshirt
Mar 25, 2021
13
30
13
It’s the budget. Do you really think Sha likes his players? Until he can afford high end snipers to complete the roster he is handcuffed. And if we can’t afford players how can we afford to ditch him and his salary? Something is wrong with some of you if you can’t figure that out. It would be more useful to put pressure on the board to give him the resources that Pitino and Hurley and Willard have and see what he can do. And cheaper than firing him and hiring another coach and starting over. And if they don’t want to do it right than they should check out of big time basketball and be LaSalle or Holy Cross or Forham. We could have a nice chunk of money if we weren’t in multiple pathetic and costly law suits.
Budget budget budget. You apologists will go to any length to excuse his deficiencies in recruiting, his offensive scheme, and his overall philosophy. Seriously calling the 3 fools gold in 2026 is a ridiculous claim. Being so tied to only one style of play and thinking about how things “should” work is foolish. This isn’t the early 2000s when he played. New era, needs new ideas

his style isn’t working money or no money. Period. Worse than a bad coach is a good coach that is so stubborn and wants to be so right that he refuses to adapt.
 
Jun 3, 2001
238
334
63
So you believe our budget should dictate our place in the standings? We're neither rich nor poor. Either we have the coach who can navigate this or we don't. If he can't do it, find somebody who can.
Well I don't believe you can ignore it!

Look, we are all a little disappointed after the fast start to the season...but maybe we all drank a little too much of the Kool Aid, and were blinded by the "blue tinted glasses"...and lets face it, we were a starving fan base after last season's debacle.

I think this team is that it is...a very flawed team that really has no 3 point shooters, and no one to play the 4 spot; they play a good "helter skelter" game, and when they can rattle the opponent, they will get some easy points off turnovers, which will sometimes be enough to offset their offensive ineptitude.

But, for the most part, this is a team playing about where they should be in that 4 - 8 range, and right now at 5.

Bottom line: we need more in the budget; there is no way to deny that scorers/shooters come at a premium price.

We also have to re-think the allocation of our budget...put the high majority of it into the top 7 ...tops 8, players...after that fill the roster with cheap frosh or cheap transfers....and hope we dont get hit with injuries. We just simply cannot afford a quality 10 man roster.
 

Hall Is Life

Senior
Oct 15, 2019
330
492
63
Well I don't believe you can ignore it!

Look, we are all a little disappointed after the fast start to the season...but maybe we all drank a little too much of the Kool Aid, and were blinded by the "blue tinted glasses"...and lets face it, we were a starving fan base after last season's debacle.

I think this team is that it is...a very flawed team that really has no 3 point shooters, and no one to play the 4 spot; they play a good "helter skelter" game, and when they can rattle the opponent, they will get some easy points off turnovers, which will sometimes be enough to offset their offensive ineptitude.

But, for the most part, this is a team playing about where they should be in that 4 - 8 range, and right now at 5.

Bottom line: we need more in the budget; there is no way to deny that scorers/shooters come at a premium price.

We also have to re-think the allocation of our budget...put the high majority of it into the top 7 ...tops 8, players...after that fill the roster with cheap frosh or cheap transfers....and hope we dont get hit with injuries. We just simply cannot afford a quality 10 man roster.
You are repeating exactly what I said. It's all on Sha. We are in agreement.
 

Bud Boomer

All-Conference
Dec 24, 2007
664
1,950
93
He’s had 3 top 60 Kenpom teams in 4 years.

The new standard of excellence ladies & gentlemen. Like LT once famously said, "Whipty damn do!"
No one said it’s a standard of excellence. It’s something that needs to be considered when deciding whether to get rid of Shaheen (which is the premise of this thread).

We are trying to figure what the best long term solution is. Maybe it’s paying a buyout and starting over with a really good MAAC coach (Gallo) or an up and coming AE coach (Grant) or a respected HM assistant (Murray). Or maybe it’s sticking with the guy who has us in the cusp of where we want to be, and might just turn the corner with a few improvements to his team building and offense.
 

MooneyHall07

Sophomore
Feb 18, 2023
155
159
43
No one said it’s a standard of excellence. It’s something that needs to be considered when deciding whether to get rid of Shaheen (which is the premise of this thread).

We are trying to figure what the best long term solution is. Maybe it’s paying a buyout and starting over with a really good MAAC coach (Gallo) or an up and coming AE coach (Grant) or a respected HM assistant (Murray). Or maybe it’s sticking with the guy who has us in the cusp of where we want to be, and might just turn the corner with a few improvements to his team building and offense.

Sha needs to evolve and grow, no question about it. Like any coach he needs to improve on certain areas to reach his full potential. I think it's fair to say that if he doesn't improve his team's offensive ability then the program will hit a ceiling of being a borderline NCAA contender with the occasional tournament appearance, which will be a disappointment. We all agree that he needs to be better as the public face of the program, especially with the media. But I agree with the last sentence wholeheartedly. None of those guys are a sure thing at the Big East level, and Sha is over .500 at SHU despite having a 7 win season last year and limited resources. I'd personally rather bet on the guy who has that track record and hope that he evolves than take a chance on an unknown.
 

NYShoreGuy

Senior
Jan 7, 2006
1,783
856
113
Budget budget budget. You apologists will go to any length to excuse his deficiencies in recruiting, his offensive scheme, and his overall philosophy. Seriously calling the 3 fools gold in 2026 is a ridiculous claim. Being so tied to only one style of play and thinking about how things “should” work is foolish. This isn’t the early 2000s when he played. New era, needs new ideas

his style isn’t working money or no money. Period. Worse than a bad coach is a good coach that is so stubborn and wants to be so right that he refuses to adapt.
He is a mid to late 90s era player
 
  • Like
Reactions: shupat08