POLL: Should this season be Tom Brands last as HC at Iowa?

Should this season be Tom Brands last as HC at Iowa?


  • Total voters
    750
  • Poll closed .

BroncHawk

All-Conference
Jan 21, 2026
636
1,906
93
Personally, I'd like to feel excited about Iowa wrestling again, and I just don't see that changing under Tom Brands. He's given us a lot of good years, and even some great ones, but I no longer believe he is the guy to make us better. I don't know what the answer is, but I'd rather be worse trying to get better than remain stagnant in the current situation.
 

heldyhawk606

Senior
Oct 10, 2001
168
464
63
Beth is not going to fire T after this season … Next year will be the determining factor…
you've got the blinders on... we want the wrestling program to be considered important by the AD, well that means they won't let it go down the path we just saw from the men's basketball program. we've seen season ticket sales drop 3k from 2 years ago, 2k from last year, THOUSANDS of empty seats against PSU, again against Minnesota - thats not even touching on the losses against ISU and Minnesota for the first time in decades, worst loss in 60 years against PSU. There's nothing coming back to say they can right the ship next year.
 

Random4598375

All-Conference
Jan 10, 2020
609
1,769
93
Now, it’s “Penn State is doing things no one else ever has, but Brands keeps us second, we didn’t need David Taylor”. Once Taylor and Penn State have separated themselves from everyone else by next year, it’ll be “Penn State and Ok St have an advantage no knee else has, but Brands keeps us third, we don’t need Nolf”. Once Manning retires and Nebraska hires Nolf and he separates Nebraska up to the PSU/OSU level, it’ll be “those programs have advantages no need else has, but Brands keeps us 4th”.

At what point do you admit you’re wrong? Never is my guess. “We may be 10th in the Big 10, but the Brands still keep us above Rutgers”. LMAO.
I must apologize for my error. Rutgers beat Minnesota last night. The Brands may not, in fact, keep Iowa ahead of Rutgers.
 

Rusty’s Dad

Redshirt
Jun 19, 2015
58
34
18
you've got the blinders on... we want the wrestling program to be considered important by the AD, well that means they won't let it go down the path we just saw from the men's basketball program. we've seen season ticket sales drop 3k from 2 years ago, 2k from last year, THOUSANDS of empty seats against PSU, again against Minnesota - thats not even touching on the losses against ISU and Minnesota for the first time in decades, worst loss in 60 years against PSU. There's nothing coming back to say they can right the ship next year.
I don’t have blinders on… I said Beth G is not going to fire T after this season. You are arguing with yourself in your lengthy post. I don’t like where Iowa is headed. Bottom line is Beth G won’t drop the hammer after one bad season
 

Mattski

All-Conference
Apr 21, 2022
997
2,635
93
I don’t have blinders on… I said Beth G is not going to fire T after this season. You are arguing with yourself in your lengthy post. I don’t like where Iowa is headed. Bottom line is Beth G won’t drop the hammer after one bad season
How about after 4 of the last 5? And I'd even argue taking 2nd in 2023 was a failure with psu beating us by 55+ at ncaa.
It hasn't been "one bad season", its been 5 straight and getting worse by the year.
 

Rusty’s Dad

Redshirt
Jun 19, 2015
58
34
18
How about after 4 of the last 5? And I'd even argue taking 2nd in 2023 was a failure with psu beating us by 55+ at ncaa.
It hasn't been "one bad season", its been 5 straight and getting worse by the year.
T will not be fired after this season. So keep arguing with yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T8KUDWN

Mattski

All-Conference
Apr 21, 2022
997
2,635
93
T will not be fired after this season. So keep arguing with yourself.
I'm not arguing with myself nor am I predicting they will be. But the majority argees it's time. Waiting another year is only prolonging the inevitable and digging the program into a deeper hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawkeye7

Rusty’s Dad

Redshirt
Jun 19, 2015
58
34
18
I'm not arguing with myself nor am I predicting they will be. But the majority argees it's time. Waiting another year is only prolonging the inevitable and digging the program into a deeper hole.
I happento agree with you … that I think it’s time … I’m simply stating Beth G won’t pull the plug after this season … Next season - similar results - then ‘yes’
 
  • Like
Reactions: kingstown
Jul 13, 2006
128
296
63
I happento agree with you … that I think it’s time … I’m simply stating Beth G won’t pull the plug after this season … Next season - similar results - then ‘yes’
I agree with you. I think its time as well. But just because it's time doesnt mean Beth will do it. I, too, thinks she gives it one more year then makes the decision after we finish outside the top 10 next year. Barring the best portal haul in the history of the sport i dont see more than 3 or 4 AA next year
 
Jul 13, 2006
128
296
63
Then why would she bring him back? Read her recent comments on the program and it wasn’t that flattering. It was also before all hell broke loose.
Its just a gut feeling on my part. I think she will give him one more year to attempt to turn it around. Personally dont see it happening though. Count me in the camp that would like to go after Nolf asap
 

Anon1751369530

Freshman
Jul 1, 2025
45
77
18
She’s heard some of the concerns from fans, but no one else has been Penn State and no one is working harder than Tom to beat them. Chad acted like he was going to ask tough questions in that part of the podcast and it was more less like someone asking and than hiding under the table while she easily deflected it.

More important piece would be fundraising for renovations to Carver and does a wrestling team not living up to expectations effect that. It doesn‘t appear too.
 

FanInBlack

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2001
1,829
3,876
113
I think their biggest weakness...people skills...is their biggest weakness. Not being able to relate to different kinds of people hurts recruiting. It hurts in pushing the right buttons for guys with different midsets .

They had no problems recruiting or coaching Spencer, ADS, Metcalf, Ramos, Gilman, etc. They were cut from the same cloth.

Just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkeyeEmpire

ChicagoHawk2020

All-Conference
Nov 6, 2017
835
2,435
92
I think their biggest weakness...people skills...is their biggest weakness. Not being able to relate to different kinds of people hurts recruiting. It hurts in pushing the right buttons for guys with different midsets .

They had no problems recruiting or coaching Spencer, ADS, Metcalf, Ramos, Gilman, etc. They were cut from the same cloth.

Just my opinion.
Definitely wouldn’t put Spencer in that category. Totally different personality.
 

FanInBlack

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2001
1,829
3,876
113
Definitely wouldn’t put Spencer in that category. Totally different personality.
I meant more of their mindset to competing.

Remember the Larry Lee recruiting story that he was concerned that Spencer was too much like Terry? And Terry said that made him the perfect coach because he knew better than anyone the mistakes he made?
 

LIV4GOD

All-Conference
Oct 2, 2001
500
1,194
93
I meant more of their mindset to competing.

Remember the Larry Lee recruiting story that he was concerned that Spencer was too much like Terry? And Terry said that made him the perfect coach because he knew better than anyone the mistakes he made?
Yet, Spencer made the same basic mistake Terry did in the Olympics. He should have backed off from the Purdue kid. We were literally yelling, "Get off your knees. Back off!"
 
Nov 1, 2021
161
476
63
Good on you.

Where does Bob Nicholls stand on the Brandses, the current team and direction of the program?
He has previously expressed that he is a supporter of the Brands, rather than of Iowa. Whether that stance has changed I am not sure.
 

Sir Pin Alot

All-Conference
Jun 25, 2025
395
1,105
93
It's all about mindset. Iowa, for the most part, and especially against better competition, wrestles timid. They seem to be paralyzed by their fear of making a mistake. What you get is mind numbing, 4 takedown performances. It needs to be instilled to let it fly, the match they wrestle today, win or lose, will make them better for the next one. That is the Iowa style of old. Wear the opponent out and bend them to your will. Wherever this was lost, it needs to be found again. I don't think TNT are the ones to bring them to the promised land again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawkeye7

MSU158

All-Conference
Nov 20, 2014
1,199
3,174
113
His buyout isn't going to be free. If you want to put out a candle you first take away the oxygen and then let it burn itself out.
Now this one is downright comical. So, Beth is so forward thinking that she held back money from the program to squeeze Brands out of it? Is that really the take you are going with????

Is it not entirely possible that wrestling simply isn't as important to her as many of you want it to be?
 

chipackhawk

All-Conference
Jan 10, 2018
475
1,161
93
Now this one is downright comical. So, Beth is so forward thinking that she held back money from the program to squeeze Brands out of it? Is that really the take you are going with????

Is it not entirely possible that wrestling simply isn't as important to her as many of you want it to be?
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one. From a fan support perspective, wrestling currently is still no lower than #4 on the Iowa sports hierarchy. If it's not important to her then that's a problem. Once the Caitlin Clark euphoria passes for good, it will be back to #3. IMO, she understands where it all stands.
 

MSU158

All-Conference
Nov 20, 2014
1,199
3,174
113
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one. From a fan support perspective, wrestling currently is still no lower than #4 on the Iowa sports hierarchy. If it's not important to her then that's a problem. Once the Caitlin Clark euphoria passes for good, it will be back to #3. IMO, she understands where it all stands.
Not sure how that response has anything to do with the post I was responding to or the point of my post. The guy literally insinuated that the revenue sharing holdback was to remove the oxygen from the candle that is Brands.

There have been plenty of posts on here from people that would know, detailing a slew of obstacles that Iowa itself has put in place that have negatively affected the Iowa wrestling program. But, there is such a drive to blame and remove Brands to the point that NO ONE wants to even begin to acknowledge these things. Instead the guy literally twisted one of these into one of the most ridiculous things I have ever read...