Rutgers $78m in debt

beans9000

Freshman
Dec 3, 2019
37
50
18
The term revenue sharing refers to school revenues that are shared with athletes.
Any division 1 program can pay out of their revenues to a max of 20.5 million.
On top of that, collectives can also give athletes compensation for nil. None of that comes from the schools.

Schools are not " given" 20.5 million to dole out to athletes...you are confused.
This is why pollard was moaning about ISU being unable to pay out the 20.5 million...they do not have revenue streams like the BIG and SEC schools.
Not sure what these other idiots are trying to say but this is my exact interpretation too. The post claiming schools are paid $20m looked like some crappy google AI compilation
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeetTheFerentzes

Gonzo_Bloor

All-Conference
Jun 30, 2025
695
1,809
93
Their university endowment is 2.04 Billion, which provides 50 million annually for spending on facilities and programs.

Cry me a river
University endowments are usually very highly restricted funds that can only be used in ways that align with the wishes of donors, and a big chunk of that value is likely in the form of non-liquid assets. It's not like a rainy day fund that the university president or AD can just dip into. If it were that easy I'm sure they would.
 

scotihawk

All-Conference
Nov 10, 2011
3,085
2,576
113
Anybody know anything about the culture of Rutgers??

Might go a ways in explaining their inability to balance a budget.
 

TrojanHawkeye

All-Conference
Feb 11, 2009
681
1,128
93
Kick them out and force Notre Dame to take their place.
 

LaQuintaHawk

All-Conference
Jun 29, 2025
1,816
3,685
113
Kick them out and force Notre Dame to take their place.
F—- ND.

I would be in favor of ending the Rutgers/Maryland experiments.

Just stay at 16 schools.

Perfectly sets up the 4-team pods:

Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin

Ohio St, Michigan, UCLA, USC

Iowa, Nebraska, Purdue, Indiana

N’western, Illinois, MSU, PSU

5 school lock-in to play each other every year with 4 others rotating onto it.

example 1 -
Iowa plays its 3 pod members plus Minn and Wis as their lock-in games every year with the remaining 10 rotating randomly to fill out the other four games.

example 2 -
Michigan plays its pod members plus MSU and N’western as its lock-ins with the remaining 10 rotating in to fill out their conference schedule.

*they could also consider a TEN game conference schedule where it would then mean 5 schools rotate onto the schedule every two years. Makes good sense.

BOOM!
 

JerseyCityHawk

All-Conference
Jul 6, 2025
898
1,547
92
it was a horrible decision to add them to the league in the first place


And right in my backyard…. This is crazy as Greg S isn’t even in the top 40 highest paid coaches…. This might sink them and I hope not as I love watching the Hawks play in my home state aa it’s an easy drive and cheap tickets …
 

83Hawk

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2023
1,453
3,193
113
I always love the “kick out team xx from the B1G” talk. But it’s foolishness. There is no path to kicking teams out & there’s no way any1 leaves. Which is good because it keeps the big boys from throwing us out when they decide to band together for yet more $$ which is inevitable.
Yep.

The Big 10 isn’t kicking anyone out. Good grief.
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2005
2,111
3,861
113
no you don’t understand, revenue sharing is given to each school, 20 million in the big and the sec. The schools boosters, donors, nil program can put any amount of money on top of that that they want or can afford. there is no salary cap, you are mistaken
No, the schools get approx 80-90 million Per team(except a couple of the left coast teams are getting less) from the TV money. From THAT money they can share up to 22% or around 20 million with athletes however the school decides to distribute that. The schools aren't given 20 million from anyone just for rev share nor are they required to share any of that TV money. And yes any donations in whatever form are on top of that amount.
 
Last edited:

OnlyTheObscure

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
2,538
3,687
113
F—- ND.

I would be in favor of ending the Rutgers/Maryland experiments.

Just stay at 16 schools.

Perfectly sets up the 4-team pods:

Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin

Ohio St, Michigan, UCLA, USC

Iowa, Nebraska, Purdue, Indiana

N’western, Illinois, MSU, PSU

5 school lock-in to play each other every year with 4 others rotating onto it.

example 1 -
Iowa plays its 3 pod members plus Minn and Wis as their lock-in games every year with the remaining 10 rotating randomly to fill out the other four games.

example 2 -
Michigan plays its pod members plus MSU and N’western as its lock-ins with the remaining 10 rotating in to fill out their conference schedule.

*they could also consider a TEN game conference schedule where it would then mean 5 schools rotate onto the schedule every two years. Makes good sense.

BOOM!
Pod system always seems to have Iowa in some dog poop group of teams.

Some want to say they they big time football but actually avoid playing anybody at all costs.
 

WeBeHerkin

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2016
4,050
4,681
113
I always love the “kick out team xx from the B1G” talk. But it’s foolishness. There is no path to kicking teams out & there’s no way any1 leaves. Which is good because it keeps the big boys from throwing us out when they decide to band together for yet more $$ which is inevitable.
If you think there is no way anyone leaves you are naive. There are ways a team like Michigan, etc could leave.