247sports B1G portal rankings

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
32,815
10,747
113
#4 Ohio St
#5 Penn St
#7 Indiana
# 16 Meechigan
# 28 USC
# 30 UCLA
# 31 Oregon
#32 Gophers
# 35 Nebraska
# 42 Wisconsin
# 43 NW
# 48 Purdue
# 53 Sparty
# 56 Washington
# 62 Illini
# 65 Clarkeyes
# 71 Terps
#74 Rutgers
 

steelclaw

Heisman
May 31, 2022
6,441
18,735
113
The thing about portal rankings, everything beyond the first 3 or 4 is really hard to quantify. It’s easy to rank the top few who got all conference caliber transfers. The rest are just getting scraps.
 

Richardstr

Redshirt
Jul 2, 2025
4
5
3
View attachment 1150300

Depending on your thoughts on how accurate ON3 player ratings are the talent change is negligible. Shifted talent around at different positions.

#4 Ohio St
#5 Penn St
#7 Indiana
# 16 Meechigan
# 28 USC
# 30 UCLA
# 31 Oregon
#32 Gophers
# 35 Nebraska
# 42 Wisconsin
# 43 NW
# 48 Purdue
# 53 Sparty
# 56 Washington
# 62 Illini
# 65 Clarkeyes
# 71 Terps
#74 Rutgers
Feel like last year we were in top 10.
 

RikeMiley

Senior
Sep 1, 2022
349
535
93
9 outa 18…is that good? Improving? Heading in the right direction?
Treading water in the middle of the conference, Colandrea is the biggest wildcard, he's probably going to make some wow plays and touchdowns and also make some boneheaded turnovers. If he's more positive than negative it could be another 7-5 year but with the tough schedule atm probably looking at 5-7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

K Rod

Senior
Oct 1, 2025
349
528
93
But Matt said we could get top players with our increased NIL pool. #35 was not what I expected after hearing Matt. We did get quantity not sure about quality. Time will tell !
 

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
10,837
2,157
113
the 95 huskers were ranked 26th in one recruiting mag so..I'd like to have a better ranking then 35
 

RikeMiley

Senior
Sep 1, 2022
349
535
93
the 95 huskers were ranked 26th in one recruiting mag so..I'd like to have a better ranking then 35
Recruiting rankings back then were wildly inaccurate and more of a crap shoot than the modern recruiting rankings. Still not a perfect system but better than it was back then.

""I've never placed a lot of confidence in those rankings," Osborne said.

Thanks to John Talman of Rivals.com, we can get a good read on how analysts regarded Osborne's recruiting classes in the early 1990s — the classes that ultimately helped produce three national championships.
The class of 1990 was ranked 10th by SuperPrep, but only 34th by the National Recruiting Advisor and 41st by Tom Lemming. The class of 1991 was ranked 28th by SuperPrep. However, Osborne did have a top-10 class in 1992 (Tommie Frazier, Toby Wright, Mike Minter, Chris Dishman, et al) — it was ranked fifth by Max Emfinger and 10th by Tom Lemming.
The 1993 class was ranked 18th by SuperPrep, and the 1994 group 22nd by Lemming and 20th by SuperPrep."
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,383
12,799
78
The thing about portal rankings, everything beyond the first 3 or 4 is really hard to quantify. It’s easy to rank the top few who got all conference caliber transfers. The rest are just getting scraps.
Yep. Maybe those scraps fill glaring needs and really help a team. For top programs landing an all conference guy might not actually improve them all that much. Maybe it just supplants a guy who would start for most other teams in their conference. I’ve largely gotten over the rankings. I’ve seen too many high 4* and 5* guys do nothing of note.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K Rod

V1nufanx4

Sophomore
Aug 15, 2018
792
135
37
Recruiting rankings back then were wildly inaccurate and more of a crap shoot than the modern recruiting rankings. Still not a perfect system but better than it was back then.

""I've never placed a lot of confidence in those rankings," Osborne said.

Thanks to John Talman of Rivals.com, we can get a good read on how analysts regarded Osborne's recruiting classes in the early 1990s — the classes that ultimately helped produce three national championships.
The class of 1990 was ranked 10th by SuperPrep, but only 34th by the National Recruiting Advisor and 41st by Tom Lemming. The class of 1991 was ranked 28th by SuperPrep. However, Osborne did have a top-10 class in 1992 (Tommie Frazier, Toby Wright, Mike Minter, Chris Dishman, et al) — it was ranked fifth by Max Emfinger and 10th by Tom Lemming.
The 1993 class was ranked 18th by SuperPrep, and the 1994 group 22nd by Lemming and 20th by SuperPrep."
Old enough to remember Tom Lemming? I am. There is no way he could accurately rate/rank high school players back in the day like he did, but he talked a good game and you mostly believed him. He was a trailblazer of sorts that seemingly pulled back the curtain on the otherwise secret world of college football recruiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz