Toggle sidebar

The Trump White House is protecting pedophiles

nytigerfan

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,250
13,171
102
This is just a fact now and it’s not up for debate. We can argue whether he’s in the files or not (spoiler alert: he is) and to what extent he’s in the files, that’s debatable. But not the fact that Trump and his White House are absolutely protecting pedophiles.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Tripletiger, Dadar, dpic73 and 2 others
Rastafarian

Rastafarian

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2025
964
1,051
93
nytigerfan said:
This is just a fact now and it’s not up for debate. We can argue whether he’s in the files or not (spoiler alert: he is) and to what extent he’s in the files, that’s debatable. But not the fact that Trump and his White House are absolutely protecting pedophiles.
Click to expand...
President Pedo Protector

Something in those files is so bad for him that he’s willing to break all laws and start a world war to keep them from getting out.

He should forever be known as President Pedo Protector.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: LafayetteBear and JohnHughsPartner
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,994
21,174
113
Rastafarian said:
President Pedo Protector

Something in those files is so bad for him that he’s willing to break all laws and start a world war to keep them from getting out.

He should forever be known as President Pedo Protector.
Click to expand...
Yes, he should

1768664625713.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
Rastafarian said:
President Pedo Protector

Something in those files is so bad for him that he’s willing to break all laws and start a world war to keep them from getting out.

He should forever be known as President Pedo Protector.
Click to expand...
so trump is breaking ALL laws? Isn't there just one obscure one somewhere he's not breaking?

Are we at war? I hadn't heard.

Any you complain about Trump's wild claims!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Rastafarian

Rastafarian

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2025
964
1,051
93
baltimorened said:
so trump is breaking ALL laws? Isn't there just one obscure one somewhere he's not breaking?

Are we at war? I hadn't heard.

Any you complain about Trump's wild claims!!!
Click to expand...
Ned - you are an idiot. “Willing to” doesn’t mean has done. And you have proven time and time again to not be objective nor put any effort into educating yourself on the biggest threat to our democracy.

Im done being polite with you and your nonsense. You are too stupid to try to educate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheValley91
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
Rastafarian said:
Ned - you are an idiot. “Willing to” doesn’t mean has done. And you have proven time and time again to not be objective nor put any effort into educating yourself on the biggest threat to our democracy.

Im done being polite with you and your nonsense. You are too stupid to try to educate.
Click to expand...
well I'll off the same request to you that I did to Nytiger , put me on ignore. There's absolutely no value in communicating with an idiot
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls, PapaGanoush, AugTig and 2 others
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
Rastafarian said:
Ned - you are an idiot. “Willing to” doesn’t mean has done. And you have proven time and time again to not be objective nor put any effort into educating yourself on the biggest threat to our democracy.

Im done being polite with you and your nonsense. You are too stupid to try to educate.
Click to expand...
so here's a question, what inside information do you have that Trump is willing to start a war? Were you one of those complaining about the "war" with Venezuela?

Not objective, does that mean not willing to agree with some of the wild - no evidence - statements made on here about things trump might to, or what laws he's breaking or how unconstitutional his actions are?

So give me the "democracy for idiots" version of the greatest threat to our democracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnHughsPartner
JohnHughsPartner

JohnHughsPartner

All-American
Nov 19, 2016
4,022
6,288
113
baltimorened said:
so trump is breaking ALL laws? Isn't there just one obscure one somewhere he's not breaking?

Are we at war? I hadn't heard.

Any you complain about Trump's wild claims!!!
Click to expand...
Ned, what are you doing? DO NOT Go against the purple, green pink haired folk in here
 
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
JohnHughsPartner said:
Ned, what are you doing? DO NOT Go against the purple, green pink haired folk in here
Click to expand...
I'm discovering that. I have to admit I'm getting pretty beat up over immigration. So far I've discovered that every ICE agent is bad, everything or just about everything Trump does is either illegal, unconstitutional, or will ruin the democracy,

I still haven't been able to convince them that being in the country illegally is against the law, and that these folks are subject to deportation. And these are the same folks that keep telling us that no one is above the law. So we go round and around a circle that has no end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
FLaw47

FLaw47

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2010
3,271
3,343
113
baltimorened said:
I'm discovering that. I have to admit I'm getting pretty beat up over immigration. So far I've discovered that every ICE agent is bad, everything or just about everything Trump does is either illegal, unconstitutional, or will ruin the democracy,

I still haven't been able to convince them that being in the country illegally is against the law, and that these folks are subject to deportation. And these are the same folks that keep telling us that no one is above the law. So we go round and around a circle that has no end.
Click to expand...

My dude, you understand the problem here is that you've created a straw man. Every one of us has acknowledged that these folks are subject to deportation. We're all mad at the manner in which it's happening. We're never going to get on the same page if you continue to create phantom opposition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PawPride, fcctiger12, yoshi121374 and 4 others
F

Fac

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2001
1,373
1,576
113
baltimorened said:
I'm discovering that. I have to admit I'm getting pretty beat up over immigration. So far I've discovered that every ICE agent is bad, everything or just about everything Trump does is either illegal, unconstitutional, or will ruin the democracy,

I still haven't been able to convince them that being in the country illegally is against the law, and that these folks are subject to deportation. And these are the same folks that keep telling us that no one is above the law. So we go round and around a circle that has no end.
Click to expand...
I realized that same thing weeks ago.
Anything to go against Trump.
They still want Harris/Walz to be in charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls, loveoysters and JohnHughsPartner
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
tboonpickens said:
given your propensity for protecting pedophiles, you should probably steer clear of asking people about their age.
Click to expand...
well if he's draft age he's not pedophile material.

I'm not for protecting pedophiles, let's find one - other than Epstein and Andrew Mountbatten. You guys are great, you want the files released, but you want all the victim names redacted. I have posted before, release all the files now and let things fall where they might. Forget the entire redacting process. Would that satisfy all those concerned about protecting pedophiles or would the outrage change to 'they didn't redact the victims names"

So you know the pedophiles, named in the files, but complain the files haven't been released....so how do you know. How are you so certain?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
tboonpickens said:
ned during the OJ trial...

how are you so certain he killed those people? 🤦‍♂️
Click to expand...
Tell you the truth, I really didn't pay much attention to the OJ Simpson trial, I was going back and forth weekly to s america.

But from what I understand, it's kind of like the debates we have on here. People who have no first hand knowledge are absolutely sure he was guilty. And people who have no first hand knowledge are absolutely sure he was innocent. And both are absolutely sure those with opposing viewpoints are idiots, dense you name it. One side though calls the other names while the other attempts to be reasonable. Like I said just like this board.

But, if you tell me what you think, I'll be sure to take the opposite side
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: TigerGrowls and AugTig
tboonpickens

tboonpickens

Heisman
Sep 19, 2001
19,889
35,169
113
ned, what do you think of Hitler? surely you must have some deep opinions despite the fact you have no firsthand knowledge of his specific actions since you weren't there. have we been unfair to Hitler these last 80 years or so?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374 and Rastafarian
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
tboonpickens said:
ned, what do you think of Hitler? surely you must have some deep opinions despite the fact you have no firsthand knowledge of his specific actions since you weren't there. have we been unfair to Hitler these last 80 years or so?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what corner you're trying to back me in to. but hey i'll answer your question...as you said I have no first hand information and while I've read a lot about his economic work and manufacturing success - Albert speer, if I recall correctly. But there's quite a bit of video and writing about his life. What I take from all this is that..in no particular order other than what comes to mind...

- he was a terrible military tactician, although his generals/admirals were very competent
- he was a dictator
- he tried and for a while succeeded in dictating the mindset for the German people through propagnda
- he transformed Germany after the first world war..had really good manufacturing/r&d staff
- he was planning for the long term
- he felt Jews were the case of most problems and developed the plan to eliminate them
- he overextended himself- his military and the country
- he killed himself

I guess there's more but off the top of my head...how'd I do?

Have we been unfair to Hitler? Not sure what your context is there. When you're the loser in a world war, the victor gets to set the narrative. There are so many narratives, some still say there was no holocaust, that Hitler is alive living in Argentina. The majority though believe Hitler was the devil incarnate. I would tend to agree with the latter. And as you said, I have no first hand knowledge and can only base my opinion on opinions of others. I would not say I have deep opinions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls and yoshi121374
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,994
21,174
113
baltimorened said:
Tell you the truth, I really didn't pay much attention to the OJ Simpson trial, I was going back and forth weekly to s america.

But from what I understand, it's kind of like the debates we have on here. People who have no first hand knowledge are absolutely sure he was guilty. And people who have no first hand knowledge are absolutely sure he was innocent. And both are absolutely sure those with opposing viewpoints are idiots, dense you name it. One side though calls the other names while the other attempts to be reasonable. Like I said just like this board.

But, if you tell me what you think, I'll be sure to take the opposite side
Click to expand...
There was only one person who had first-hand knowledge Ned and there was zero evidence for a different culprit. It wasn't hard to determine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tboonpickens
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
dpic73 said:
There was only one person who had first-hand knowledge Ned and there was zero evidence for a different culprit. It wasn't hard to determine.
Click to expand...
and yet, if I recall correctly he was found not guilty so apparently there wasn't enough evidence to definitively convict.

innocent until proven guilty
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
FLaw47 said:
So, to be clear, you'd have let your hypothetical daughter/grand daughter date him once he was acquitted?
Click to expand...
where'd that come from? How do you go from asking about the trial to "being clear" about an OJ date. I wasn't even fuzzy about dating, the topic was not presented .

You asked about the OJ trial....I gave a factual answer. He was found not guilty. What more do you want from me?

My hypothetical granddaughter is way too young for OJ
 
FLaw47

FLaw47

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2010
3,271
3,343
113
baltimorened said:
where'd that come from? How do you go from asking about the trial to "being clear" about an OJ date. I wasn't even fuzzy about dating, the topic was not presented .

You asked about the OJ trial....I gave a factual answer. He was found not guilty. What more do you want from me?

My hypothetical granddaughter is way too young for OJ
Click to expand...

I'm responding to your innocent until proven guilty refrain (I never asked about OJ, BTW).

That was a dodge regarding the dating question. Would you feel safe with someone you loved dating OJ? He was acquitted, afterall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12 and Rastafarian
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
FLaw47 said:
I'm responding to your innocent until proven guilty refrain (I never asked about OJ, BTW).

That was a dodge regarding the dating question. Would you feel safe with someone you loved dating OJ? He was acquitted, afterall.
Click to expand...
as I said, I don't have a daughter and my granddaughter is way too young for OJ.

what' s your point? Don't tell me you have issue with innocent until proven guilty. where are you trying to take me?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
FLaw47

FLaw47

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2010
3,271
3,343
113
baltimorened said:
as I said, I don't have a daughter and my granddaughter is way too young for OJ.

what' s your point? Don't tell me you have issue with innocent until proven guilty. where are you trying to take me?
Click to expand...

I'm trying to figure out if you think being acquitted means they didn't do it. Your statements certainly seem to suggest that you expect everyone else to act that way.
 
B

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,097
3,702
113
JohnHughsPartner said:
Let’s get back to the OP. How’s everything working out? 🤣
Click to expand...
maybe it's me, but I simply don't understand how a post does from the WH protecting pedophiles to my opinion of Hitler, to OJ simpson guilty or not, to would I want my hypothetical daughter or grandfather dating OJ, to a question about the premise of "innocent until proven guilty".
 
firegiver

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
73,257
19,263
113
baltimorened said:
maybe it's me, but I simply don't understand how a post does from the WH protecting pedophiles to my opinion of Hitler, to OJ simpson guilty or not, to would I want my hypothetical daughter or grandfather dating OJ, to a question about the premise of "innocent until proven guilty".
Click to expand...
Do you understand that the three branches of government are supposed to check each other's power? Why is the doj denying a judges order made by Congress to have an independent observer for the release of the Epstein files?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12, yoshi121374, Rastafarian and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom