id argue that saying the democrats would do the same thing is just as interesting of a defense for someone who i assume disagrees with them more than not.
I'll repeat what I said in a previous post, arguing that you think someone else should've been guilty for a crime is an odd defense of someone else who was proven guilty.
"Dems are the party of authoritarianism and censorship, and they force their beliefs on others while silencing any opposing views. "
Radicals on both sides, like I'm assuming you are OP, do the same ****. To clarify you feel the Dem's are forcing views, now take a step back and realize the...
To each their own for what content they enjoy watching. My argument would be that tucker had no place on a news channel. It is just television not news and portraying it as news was the issue, not that he had a show in general.
https://zdoggmd.com/covid-death-stats/?fbclid=IwAR2uqg7ahBzIbtOCSlF3KNQSXhLa5FJejEJ3TRiKySXlQuTQq2wmtaratGo
This article explains its pretty well.
TL DR - If i shoot you in the leg and it gets infected and you die from the infection. what did you die from the gunshot or the infection?
EDIT...
Again I'm not asking for your paraphrase, I'd like to see the information.
That said scientists still work using the scientific method. The core concept is "make a theory" -> "test the theory" -> "revise the theory based on the test data". Meaning it is entirely possible the testing...
I think the guy is an idiot, but credit where credit is due. The guy is correct. With quite possibly his first correct statement maybe he should stick to politics and leave sports alone.