if we theoretically pooled our money for every 4 years and fans were on board we would likely have successful tournament teams at every four years, at worst 8. what's different in this current NIL besides never making the tournament?
if we theoretically pooled our money for every 4 years and fans were on board. we would likely have the most successful tournament team at every four years, at worst 8. what's different in this current NIL situation?
tournament success is what matters and that's why not making the tournament and perennially losing are not too distant cousins.
anya there is always truth under his sarcasm. that's why it comes across wrong. it's not really sarcasm.