Well if you go by the NET rankings UK has 4 top 10 wins. There’s maybe a handful of teams that are even close to that so difficulty of schedule isn’t an issue.
Well this spells out exactly why the NET is incredibly flawed. As a consequence we see results with Bama and Auburn and I would also add Arizona and Duke to them as well as teams highly overrated. The first and biggest factor of any rating system should always be if you win games. Level of...
Taylor was only 7-24 on Saturday but problem is he hit 6 3’s. A lot of them were shots you’d want him to take also. And he had an even better game against Houston earlier in the season. Even a clueless moron like LmdCat knows Houston is a great defensive team lol. Against LSU he only shot 3-12...
The push for Wisconsin to be a 2 seed is truly mind boggling stuff. They played road games at Arizona and Providence and were smoked both games. Also lost at home to Tennessee. Wins against teams like Marquette,Virginia,Michigan St and Ohio St are what these so called “pundits” are using to pump...
Uh no they’re not. They’re ranked 66th in KenPom and 80th in the NET. Absolutely not a tournament team at the moment. Plus they were just smoked by 30 by Illinois in their last game.
The NET currently has Iowa St ranked 5th. Iowa St has an 0-2 record against quad one teams and is 2-0 against quad 2. They’re also 8-0 against quad 4. Maybe it’ll level out after more games are played but at this point it’s just pure garbage as a metric to determine how teams should be ranked.
Lmao so if AP voters had done their job and watched UK play against Kansas, Miami and UNC they would know this UK team isn’t a top 10 team? Is that the crap you’re using to rationalize your moronic statement? And btw im willing to bet that most of the voters have watched UK play in those games...
So you didn’t say UK was top 10 in name only but if their name wasn’t UK they wouldn’t be ranked in the top 10? Lmao you just keep contradicting yourself. But rankings this early in the year obviously don’t matter much. But I do find it kinda strange for supposed UK fans to argue this team isn’t...
So you think FAU is a name team that’s overrated like UK? You just said their resumes are identical but earlier said UK was a top 10 team by name only and that’s why I compared FAU’s ranking to them. You seem to be contradicting yourself very badly on this thread lol.
Another stupid thread just like last year with the usual band of idiots whining about Bryce Hopkins. And we all saw how Jacob Toppin completely abused him head to head in the tourney. Just goes to show because a player leaves here and has success its not because they were mismanaged or held back...