I don't understand the argument for Indiana over Uconn. Huskies have more titles, with more coaches, more recently, and have the same drawback of not being consistently a top team. Uconn clears them in nearly all fields.
Good point. Why aren't we talking about Oklahoma State. Clearly a blue blood after those back to back championships is 45-46. Or Temple, 5th all time is wins!
I mean they're in my tier one, I'm using it to justify Uconn. But pre 1980 Duke has 0 championships a 2 runner-ups including a 12 year tournament drought from 1966-1978.
Fair, but Duke has really only been an elite program since the early-mid 1980s (about 10 years longer) but have only had success under one coach unlike Uconn.
Riley was too old to ever really have a chance of building anything at Nebraska. Clawson has time and has proven success at multiple different schools.