Recent content by redwaxjester

  1. R

    C-J undermines UofL civil dispute

    The CJ quoted the PI as seeking “any allegations of sexual harassment between Jurich and females involved with the University.” That's not the CJ's terminology or sensationalism. Unless the CJ is fabricating quotes, we do have an idea of the line of questioning the PI used. Also, you said the CJ...
  2. R

    Per Dakich

    Right, that's what I don't understand. Considering the US Supreme Court said the NCAA could do whatever they want with respect to member schools, why are people talking about UofL suing the NCAA? Wouldn't the NCAA attorney just point to the Tarkanian decision?
  3. R

    Per Dakich

    This is what I'm trying to understand - what legal recourse does UofL have against the NCAA? What would UofL argue in court? Being inconsistent, hypocritical, and biased? That's fine, and easily proven, but why would the court care? I'm not an attorney, so I apologize if I'm missing something...
  4. R

    C-J undermines UofL civil dispute

    The Jurich situation is a perfect example of "Ready, Fire, Aim," no pun intended. That's ALWAYS a poor strategy, and now UofL is trying to build a case after the fact. I loathe the CJ, for many reasons, but I don't think they're sensationalizing "information gathering" in and of itself, but...
  5. R

    This sleezeball knew, yet there's a chance we lose the banner.

    So your argument is that the morality of providing strippers and prostitutes to recruits is subjective? If so, why didn't UofL challenge the NCAA on their judgment of it? To my knowledge, everyone at UofL agreed that it was "repugnant." Regardless, it's a moot point. Using logic and common...
  6. R

    This sleezeball knew, yet there's a chance we lose the banner.

    Why would it go to court if the appeal is denied? The NCAA broke no laws.
  7. R

    Elephant in the room. UofL is SuCkS superbowl.......

    A few things - 1. Any suggestion that UofL is UK's "Super Bowl" in basketball is asinine, and I think everyone in this thread knows it. It's a rivalry game, which, by definition, is of elevated importance. This is especially true of UK fans who are Louisville residents. UofL fans tend to...
  8. R

    Why fire Jurich?

    At this point, I don't think Jurich would come back even if offered.
  9. R

    Why fire Jurich?

    I get it, but my concern is the possibility of Jurich ultimately being retained. I don't understand how anything you've said above affects that.
  10. R

    Why fire Jurich?

    Grissom violating open meetings law doesn't have anything to do with Jurich being retained. His "firing" was not a BOT action.
  11. R

    Why fire Jurich?

    So you seriously believe it's possible Jurich will be retained? Postel's actions were unanimously supported by the BOT. Postel all but said "we are cleaning house." Seems pretty cut and dried to me, but what do I know. Hopefully you're right.
  12. R

    Why fire Jurich?

    Jurich is gone, folks. It's all procedural at this point.
See more
Top Bottom