Recent content by realfrancofan

  1. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    The problem is that MM is already invested in the OAG narrative to the tune of ~$11 M. It would be nice if he ever came clean, but I think it is very unlikely It would be nice to recruit the PSU BOT or the MSM, but they are both deeply invested in the conventional wisdom. It would be nice if a...
  2. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    I agree. I don't believe that Ziegler is the best messenger; however we don't get to choose the messenger in this case. Nobody else has stepped up. Dick Anderson is not a bad messenger, but with no criticism of Dick intended, I am not sure he has the wherewithal to be effective to the scale that...
  3. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    If you can and are interested, please provide what you believe is a crazy conspiracy in what Ziegler or I believe happened in this entire fiasco. Ziegler claims to be an anti-conspiracy person. To me, the story that he tells in the WTBOH podcasts makes a lot more sense that the OAG narrative...
  4. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    I am aligning myself in the Penn State case with Ziegler because of his proven track record on this case and his 60 hour epic podcast "With the Benefit of Hindsight" (WTBOH). I also also aligning myself in the Penn State case with Mark Pendergrast, Ralph Cipriano, John Snedden, Fred Crews...
  5. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    One of the biggest mistakes the BOT made was not to seriously vet the claims that came in. For anyone interested in what the vetting process entailed, please read the following article by Ralph Cipriano "Easy Money at Penn State."...
  6. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Yes, I know there are a lot of issues going around at this time. I am sorry that you are not interested in what I am fairly certain is a colossal miscarriage of justice.
  7. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    I am not aware of any recordings or transcripts of Jerry's exact words. The trial testimony is disputed by Jerry. I also believe it is possible for police officers, either intentionally or not, to remember things differently from what actually happened. For example what happened in a different...
  8. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Where do Ziegler, Cipriano, Snedden and/or Pendergrast have it wrong? I find what they all have to say as very believable that is back up with facts and evidence.
  9. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Thank you Bob. Nobody can answer the question because there is no good answer. All of the accuser's stories have serious problems. I saw the following graphic on this question on twitter:
  10. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    Allan Myers was like a son to Sandusky and stated in his November 2011 interview with Curtis Everhart that Sandusky had never done anything sexual to him. Sandusky has stated that he never said he wished he were dead during the 1998 investigation. There was an thorough investigation done in...
  11. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    There has been a ton of new evidence in the last 10 years since Sandusky's trial that has come out including Snedden's report on the federal investigation he conducted, the alumni BOT critical review of the Freeh report, the McChesney diary, the tape of Andrew Shubin trying to change the story...
  12. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    If you are so sure sure of how obviously guilty that Sandusky is, please identify the single accuser/witness that you believe makes the strongest case that Sandusky harmed any child and that you would be willing to bet your house on. I don't believe you can answer this simple question of the...
  13. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    I believe that Sandusky is innocent beyond not only any reasonable doubt, but beyond any real doubt. I base my opinion on extensive research that has been done in the case including Mark Pendergrast's book "The Most Hated Man in America," John Ziegler's With the Benefit of Hindsight podcast...
  14. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    What are your thoughts about Shubin changing the testimony of one of his perspective clients to win as big a settlement as possible from Penn State? Are you upset, fine with it, have no opinion or something else?
  15. realfrancofan

    Jerry Sandusky files a pro se motion for a new trial and asks for evidentiary hearings

    You may not care about it, but I sure as hell do. I know him not to be a monster. I believe that the state railroaded Sandusky, Curley, Schultz, Spanier and Paterno. It may not happen tomorrow, but I believe that one day the story of what exactly happened will become a lot clearer.
See more
Top Bottom