Recent content by Maroon_Machine

  1. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Well demonstrated, that’s 33 with JVs moved up...and it doesn’t look any stronger next year...kids see what going on and a few kids want play next year based on coaching decisions made this year....not sure what parents have to do with coaching decisions...
  2. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    I agree Blankenship is a great guy...He needs to have a better game plan and a hand hold on OC...Blankenship has inherited a lot of talent over the years and it’s no different now. If line is so bad and Sain so great then it a wash..if line is so bad then change it up...Put Sain and Lossiah on...
  3. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Really! Either school So, keep #33 at fullback because he blocks his tail off. Can he not run the football too? Why don’t coaching staff give him 150 attempts he’ll have the same numbers as Sain...Put Sain at fullback and let him block...it seems like swaindad40 and coaching staff only wants...
  4. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Sure, in all previous posts swain can’t win or move the ball without Sain...come on, this is an open forum...There are other RBs in Swain’s stable. You keep posting stats of only one RB so you must be to close to see the issue with this team, team player! Then how did you get HUDL video of...
  5. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Really! So, Sain wouldn’t start over Anderson or Hooper?
  6. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Wow, well said...
  7. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    I agree there’s only one LB and FS 10 yards down field..at least they figured it out...
  8. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Well, it’s a shame coaching is blind to the fact our participation is way down because of current plan...the band has more participants then football team. Sad that current kids and parents are talking about leave to other schools...
  9. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    It not the players fault they get put in a unsuccessful situation...there’s no drama here only call it as I see it...if your a defensive secondary genius then you should know to put the extra DB in the game to play cover two or cover three you have to take out a lineman up front leaving you with...
  10. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Ok, Donald, let get back thread...and how it was O/D lines fault we lost the game...that FS shouldn’t be making tackles...come on, swaindad40..
  11. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Well this seem to have hit a nerve..Are you bias? Tell me what your prototypical FS looks like...Do they attack or run down plays from behind? It about coaches not changing the plan when current plan is not working...as far as rushing yards are concerned give the ball to the other backs 150...
  12. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Well, we have juniors and seniors RBs that can run the ball and they are just as fast...believe me, he is not the only horse in stable...what I’m saying is the pairing in play now isn’t working. As stated earlier, we could have had at least the same if not better success with different...
  13. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Great kid, I’m sure he could have generated 37 yards on 16 attempts..he could have thrown the ball down field too...I’m sure he could have thrown a five yard out or a slant...something...Ridiculous, Offensive coordinator...
  14. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    I agree a good feller, not a dominant back as swaindad40 suggests...coaching staff pipe dream, at some point they need to make a change or stick with current personal and get the same results...There’s not a back in SMC that can just take over a game.
  15. M

    Murphy vs Swain Co

    Every one has a role to play on both offense and defense...our line can only do so much if run support is lacking. When you have three down linemen in a run situation it’s not a players call...our line and ends have been playing well...do the math, 3 can’t stop 5. Now, for second level support...
See more
Top Bottom