It’s a hot take I have, but, from my metric of judging a team, year 1 underperformed (probably injuries) and year 2 over performed slightly or close to were I anticipated
Last years using the players mentioned per 40 coming in was
DA 15.6
CC 10.5
OO 22.9
AJ 14* “freshman. Used end of season pts”
MM 13.8* “freshman. Used end of season pts
Total projected points per 40 = 76.8pts
This years team based on per 40 from previous season.
ZD 21.2
AW 23.9
MM 22.1
JM 22.5...
In this case it was more like “you’re abusing a female member of my family. So I’m going to make you walk the 10 or 12 miles out of this holler barefoot to give you time to think if you’d be walking out next time we go for a ride”