Stop.
You detest UofL. I get it.
Michigan’s cheating gained them far more of a competitive advantage than UofL with hookers that didn’t affect recruiting whatsoever.
UNC got away with fake classes for crying out loud. Which was the more egregious ”impermissible benefit?”
My point is that...
Michigan just got off pretty much Scott free for blatantly cheating. NCAA’s reasoning? The players shouldn’t be penalized for actions made by coaches no longer at the school. Precedent now?
Luke Hancock was MVP of a game that didn’t exist. Does that make sense?
Sue for civil and see if the...
Geez, like hookers don’t go to parties on campuses. You‘d think they took fake classes (oops…UNC did).
The entire ruling was arbitrary and ripe to be challenged in court. The latest Michigan ruling has now given UofL legal precedent.