Dringtuoti- first thing is I could care less who came up with the rating system or who approved it, it sucks plain and simple. I agree with you 100% Middlesex is much better than the record of (16-8) but you mention some games they lost in which 4 of those 8 games they were missing big time...
VHSL should be ashamed of themselves. Middlesex and Lancaster playing in the first round after both winning their regular season and conference tounaments. I know, I know it goes by rating. Well their rating system is horse ****. Middlesex had a chance to win with about 7 seconds left on would...
Uvacavs1, I agree there should be a better system than what we are operating under. I played 1995-98 and there were no divisions 1 & 2 it was just single A. Much harder to get to regionals and states for sure but it was such an easy system. You knew from day 1 what you had to do to get to the...
That's crazy to me. I get the theory of being rewarded a little bit for playing bigger schools but when you finish at only .500 and don't win you tournament or regular season and get a 5 or 6 seed in a regional tournament that's a little off to me. It's like Sussex which I think is a pretty good...
If this is official, then this is absolutely absurd. How is a (12-12) team Luray who doesn't win their conference regular season or tournament seeded higher than Middlesex (16-8) which won their conference regular season and tournament. Also Middlesex has beaten Lancaster, Northumberland by 30...
Middlesex looked very good this week beating Northumberland by 30 and Lancaster in their backyard by 10. They got 3 players Holmes, Marshall and Johnson and when they're on they can beat anybody.