you all understand that this was said, right?
either cal hasn't graduated or sent every to the pros, or indiana has too
if you don't understand that logic then seriously, you aren't a smart person
that's what going pro or graduating means, i agree.
do you understand that cal hasn't had all his players graudate or go pro?
do you understand that, brah?
it seems like you don't
it is the same dummy... if you are comparing transfer lists indiana's is longer.
but you say that all cal players have graduated or went pro.... Ummm, ok, well if we are not including transfers, then that would be true. and i assume we are not counting transfers, because that is the ONLY way...
hahahahahha... those players aren't at iu... they transferred
how dumb are you guys... and for the record etherington did graduate.
you have a guy get on here and say that all cals players went pro or graduated...
well they haven't... if we are counting transfers
he asked how having every...
hahahahhaa
ummm well last time i checked you asked how having all cals players go pro or graduate compares to indiana, right????
well, indiana under crean is the exact same in that regard, so.....
there is a dummy here, thats for sure
indiana is the belle of the ball... kentucky is filled with trash , lies , cheats , and scandal..
i'd love to see crean and calipari in a fight, crean would destroy him
duke over uk.
duke has had very good seasons, and won two titles. Just not as much consistent tourny success.
if you want to argue uk over uconn, that may be more credible, but i think almost everyone would rather have the two titles.