Also, they lost 3 out of their final 8 games, squeaked by Vandy in the SECT, and lost to a 15 seed. Not the accomplishments of a 2,3,4, or 5 seed in my opinion. Not playing their best ball down the stretch into March.
No, not stupid-- and no, not trolling. Kentucky lost 3 of its last 8 games (and barely beat a bad Vanderbilt team in the SECT) and did not look even close to the team they were when they beat Tennessee and Kansas. I think Kentucky was given their #2 seed because of early season success and...
I have seen a lot of people on this board who are trashing Cal as a coach-- he is a magnificent recruiter and has won big at UK. I think sometimes because of the jersey good things are given (like a 2 seed which was unwarranted) when UK should have been probably a 6 seed. I had Kentucky going...
I have been on this board multiple times. I like to read different takes from different schools' fans.. It is an interesting view point. I think Kentucky should have been maybe a 6th seed. It isn't my fault lots of people picked them to win it all. And that's not trolling. Please tell me...
I have all of my teeth. I went to Georgia Tech, and follow the Vols. I assumed this was a sports board I could post on... but instead I am told I don't have teeth.
Didn't know you couldn't discuss sports with such a "blue blood".