Agreed. Honestly the Hicks era always fielded big, strong, tough, very well coached teams that were a tough out for anyone. I mean it looked like a 100 of them coming down those stairs back in his day. That coupled with the fan support made that a tough place to play. The Salem/Pulaski...
You can write war and peace on this topic and 2 facts will never change
1. Richlands broke the rules and cheated
2. Breaking those rules gave richlands a competitive advantage
Anything else is moot. I dont care if he ordered rhe cleata 10 years ago, he chose to use them against Salem. Richlands...
Let's try to stick to facts
1. Richlands cheated. This is an undeniable fact. Why do people cheat? To gain an advantage. So this notion that "we were so confident" or "we could beat Salem in flip flops" doesn't line up with the actions taken at all. So yes, this is truly all we need to...
Salem/Pulaski was really really good....seemed to fade to non-existent the further Pulaski got from the Hicks era....conversely, if the fall of Salem holds, it may be back on, just on the lower end of things