Re-watched the game and here are some tidbits

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,723
4,133
113
Our first down passing was really good thru out the game. It gave us many open targets as ISU was crowding the box with 7 or 8 guys. We need to keep doing this to back off the defense.

Our 4th qtr running plays finally featured some wider runs with the RBacks with some pin and pull blocking and some different blocking where our RBacks were cutting back to good sized holes. The experts said that ISU had a very good front seven and they play a funky Dee with their Lbkrs. Took awhile but the running plays worked late.

Nice to have ex-hawk Paul Burmeister call the game. He always does a very good job. I would like him as Dolph's replacement but Paul has a very good gig with NBC.

I thought the DLine held up well with all the jumbo blocking packages ISU ran. There were not a lot of big holes for ISU runners and they especially contained their QB. Dbacks covered well as there were not any big breakdowns as ISU had one guy break deep early.

The Lbkrs were lights out for the most part. It looked like they had some keys on which Lbkr would be spying on the qb based on the ISU formation.
 

Oldman74

Sophomore
Dec 24, 2012
68
142
33
If they are going with Brown, Iowa needs the read option and the RPO to be established. The RPO specifically could've been highly effective against a loaded box, while drawing in the LBs and secondary.
A second or third level RPO against a loaded box is more often than not a predetermined throw because the run read is going to be taken away based on alignment. Defenses are much better these days at making RPO reads cloudy, especially for teams that don't major in RPOs like Iowa. Not necessarily disagreeing with the concept, but it almost becomes closer to a play action pass which is more Iowa's style.
p.s. Chris Collinsworth, the worst voice in football, things anything with a run fake is an RPO and it drives me FREAKING INSANE!
 

squeezebox_1

All-Conference
Mar 6, 2018
948
1,405
93
fair point, usually the RPO is reading the field safety while hitting a WR slant or comeback route. I'm not sure Hank is entirely capable of these quick types of decisions, but if the safety is sucking up, as they were for ISU, it would be a great opportunity for a 1 on 1 with James or Diaz.
 
Aug 14, 2025
283
427
63
Rewatching it now and the touchdown they called a touchdown for ISU was not a touchdown.. Elbow hit before the ball passed the goal line. Don't know how they could review that and come up with a touchdown.
While I agree, rules/replay expert DID say that, given the camera angles, it would be tough to overturn.

Not sure how they DON'T have a camera on each pylon going straight across the goa line...
 

iahawkeyes17

All-Conference
Apr 22, 2014
817
2,087
83
Our first down passing was really good thru out the game. It gave us many open targets as ISU was crowding the box with 7 or 8 guys. We need to keep doing this to back off the defense.

Our 4th qtr running plays finally featured some wider runs with the RBacks with some pin and pull blocking and some different blocking where our RBacks were cutting back to good sized holes. The experts said that ISU had a very good front seven and they play a funky Dee with their Lbkrs. Took awhile but the running plays worked late.

Nice to have ex-hawk Paul Burmeister call the game. He always does a very good job. I would like him as Dolph's replacement but Paul has a very good gig with NBC.

I thought the DLine held up well with all the jumbo blocking packages ISU ran. There were not a lot of big holes for ISU runners and they especially contained their QB. Dbacks covered well as there were not any big breakdowns as ISU had one guy break deep early.

The Lbkrs were lights out for the most part. It looked like they had some keys on which Lbkr would be spying on the qb based on the ISU formation.
I’m not saying we needed to throw 20 straight passes like MN did to open 2nd half vs Miss st but would’ve nice to see us throw on 1st down 3-5 times in a row or least till they stopped us. Because throws were there all night and Blackledge for nbc kept harping on it for a reason. I’m a Lester fan but not his best game last week. But pleased last 2 scoring drives brown got to the check down or finding Vonnahme and running game finally got some Solid runs something I expected more of.

I agree with Burmeister not because he’s an alum but think he’s so much better than nepo baby Noah Eagle who called TNF in Australia and why we got Paul. Lastly with DL I’ve been very impressed with Hawthorne.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HAWKNESS

DukeSlater

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2023
2,069
4,792
113
Hey call up Lester and tell him what he needs to do.
Apparently somebody needs to based on the evidence everyone with eyes could see. Oh, when they have 11 guys stacked over center, let's try a couple QB sneaks. Yah, that's some creative, sneaky stuff right there. No wonder Lester's NFL offense takes so long to learn.
 

DukeSlater

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2023
2,069
4,792
113
Rewatching it now and the touchdown they called a touchdown for ISU was not a touchdown.. Elbow hit before the ball passed the goal line. Don't know how they could review that and come up with a touchdown.
Same way a review can add a second on the clock. The same way a review can call an illegal fair catch signal, even though it wasn't, and even though it wasn't called on the field. Think of the review booth as a kingdom and the review official as the king. That should be easy these days.
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,723
4,133
113
Paul has done very well with ND, the Olympics, and NBC. Would really like to see him back to take Dolph's place, and I'd take Danan Hughes in a heartbeat to be the analyst. (again, would be tough getting him away from his KC Chiefs gig!)
Yeah, what a great time to be announcing etc for the Chiefs, what a ride, the chiefs might have that big time running game now
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,723
4,133
113
While I agree, rules/replay expert DID say that, given the camera angles, it would be tough to overturn.

Not sure how they DON'T have a camera on each pylon going straight across the goa line...
Yeah, cameras are cheap now compared to the $billions the networks pay to broadcast which means they make more $billions in AD revenue
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyebob1962

UIAlumFireFighter

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2018
1,288
1,961
113
Our DL is weak and I'm definitely not sold on #5 (Hawkins?) being starter caliber.

If not for Buffington.....wow, our D would struggle.

And how TF do we not have someone other than a non-speedy 6'4" wide receiver to return punts?? So confusing.
 

2D

All-American
Oct 8, 2013
3,124
6,524
113
A few things I noticed during my rewatch:

The Oline bent, but never broke. Got some push a few times and almost always gave Hank enough time to throw.

WRs were consistently burning ISU's secondary getting open and at times, wide open.

Brown still stares down his first option

We really controlled the fourth quarter, getting good push on the LOS and the clown's tackling was getting worse.

Despite the inexperience of this team, they showed maturity and poise when it mattered most. We stopped getting self inflicted penalties and toughed it out. The Clowns on the other hand started to break and lose control. This was likely a good game to have early, could pay dividends later on
 
Last edited:

Hawkmanic23

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2026
2,256
1,794
113
Our DL is weak and I'm definitely not sold on #5 (Hawkins?) being starter caliber.

If not for Buffington.....wow, our D would struggle.

And how TF do we not have someone other than a non-speedy 6'4" wide receiver to return punts?? So confusing.
Vander Zee isn’t speedy? I want a punt returner who makes good decisions and is sure handed. Perhaps that won’t end up being Vander Zee; however, we probably got spoiled by guys like Wetjen and DeJean.
 

Hawk_4shur

All-Conference
Jan 2, 2009
890
2,111
93
Our DL is weak and I'm definitely not sold on #5 (Hawkins?) being starter caliber.

If not for Buffington.....wow, our D would struggle.

And how TF do we not have someone other than a non-speedy 6'4" wide receiver to return punts?? So confusing.
Probably don't have a Coop or KW on the team, so priority #1 is to catch the dam ball.
 

UIAlumFireFighter

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2018
1,288
1,961
113
Probably don't have a Coop or KW on the team, so priority #1 is to catch the dam ball.
How many guys on the roster, a Big Ten football team roster, and not one of them is perfect for the roll of punt returner? Get outta here.

Just “catch the ball” is the conservative nature of this program, which is F’ing lame. With how much we tend to struggle fielding an offense that can get buckets of points, it should be an overwhelming priority to find a quick/speedy guy to return punts and not just catch punts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sett1997

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
2,723
4,133
113
How many guys on the roster, a Big Ten football team roster, and not one of them is perfect for the roll of punt returner? Get outta here.

Just “catch the ball” is the conservative nature of this program, which is F’ing lame. With how much we tend to struggle fielding an offense that can get buckets of points, it should be an overwhelming priority to find a quick/speedy guy to return punts and not just catch punts.
I am fine with Evan James if that is the guy who ran one back but he needs to be able to judge those punts quick and not let them bounce.

1. Catch it and dont fumble, take the fair catch when need be
2. Get some return yards.

I thought Vanderzee had two nice runbacks in the 4th qtr.
 

WeBeHerkin

All-American
Aug 5, 2016
4,917
5,564
113
How many guys on the roster, a Big Ten football team roster, and not one of them is perfect for the roll of punt returner? Get outta here.

Just “catch the ball” is the conservative nature of this program, which is F’ing lame. With how much we tend to struggle fielding an offense that can get buckets of points, it should be an overwhelming priority to find a quick/speedy guy to return punts and not just catch punts.
We just had friggin DeJean and Wetjen. What planet are you on????????????????????
 

52317Hawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
1,274
1,435
113
Our DL is weak and I'm definitely not sold on #5 (Hawkins?) being starter caliber.

If not for Buffington.....wow, our D would struggle.

And how TF do we not have someone other than a non-speedy 6'4" wide receiver to return punts?? So confusing.
Buffington really needs to work on his pass defense. There was a time or three when he had his back to the QB and the receiver made a catch. Other than that he will be a good one.
 
Hawkeye Report

Latest

  1. 01 Hawkeye Report Basketball Hawkeye Report Podcast
  2. 02 Hawkeye Report Basketball Iowa Men's Basketball Big Ten Schedule Released
  3. 03 Hawkeye Report Basketball Iowa Women's Basketball Big Ten schedule released
  4. 04 Hawkeye Report Football Abdul Hodge talks Iowa Tight Ends
  5. 05 Hawkeye Report Basketball Recruiting 2027 Iowa Basketball Recruiting Hot Board