Put yourself in their shoes. First, you watch Collins come within a conversation of signing last November, a move that everyone predicted was locked in, until it wasn't.
Then you watch Mark Pope miss on 13 straight top 20 recruits. All of them visited Lexington. All of them told UK, "no thanks." But you still had hope that Stokes would come. After all, just like Collins, UK was the perceived favorite for Stokes in the fall of '25. Just like Collins, you tell Mark Pope that you will support him with another round of a significant war chest.
Mark Pope: "We'll need around $6.5 million for Stokes. Can you guys help?"
Boosters: "You got it, coach. We'll go all-in with you again."
And then decision day arrives for Stokes and you find out he'd already given a verbal to Kansas a month before and was just playing Pope the whole time.
But then a period of time passes and there is a Croatian sensation that is demanding around $6 to 7 million.
Pope asks for help again to land Kusturica.
Mark Pope: "We will need around $6.5 million for Kusturica. Can you guys help?"
Boosters: "You say he's a future top 3 pick someday? You've got it. We'll put together another warchest for you."
And then decision day comes and goes for Kusturica and you find out he was locked in to UCLA the entire time.
Rob Wright? The same. UK led until they found out there were getting played to up the maximum offer from BYU.
And then comes Mitchell. Coach Pope comes to you one more time and asks if you can help open the vault once more.
You swoop in and offer another virtually blank check. Pope thanks you with a hug and a promise but two weeks later you wake up on a Monday to discover that Mitchell is back on the Missouri campus with no intention of attending Kentucky.
At what point do you stop investing millions into the Mark Pope project and start restructuring those funds into a potential future buyout?
Then you watch Mark Pope miss on 13 straight top 20 recruits. All of them visited Lexington. All of them told UK, "no thanks." But you still had hope that Stokes would come. After all, just like Collins, UK was the perceived favorite for Stokes in the fall of '25. Just like Collins, you tell Mark Pope that you will support him with another round of a significant war chest.
Mark Pope: "We'll need around $6.5 million for Stokes. Can you guys help?"
Boosters: "You got it, coach. We'll go all-in with you again."
And then decision day arrives for Stokes and you find out he'd already given a verbal to Kansas a month before and was just playing Pope the whole time.
But then a period of time passes and there is a Croatian sensation that is demanding around $6 to 7 million.
Pope asks for help again to land Kusturica.
Mark Pope: "We will need around $6.5 million for Kusturica. Can you guys help?"
Boosters: "You say he's a future top 3 pick someday? You've got it. We'll put together another warchest for you."
And then decision day comes and goes for Kusturica and you find out he was locked in to UCLA the entire time.
Rob Wright? The same. UK led until they found out there were getting played to up the maximum offer from BYU.
And then comes Mitchell. Coach Pope comes to you one more time and asks if you can help open the vault once more.
You swoop in and offer another virtually blank check. Pope thanks you with a hug and a promise but two weeks later you wake up on a Monday to discover that Mitchell is back on the Missouri campus with no intention of attending Kentucky.
At what point do you stop investing millions into the Mark Pope project and start restructuring those funds into a potential future buyout?