So, little gibby's gay in your eyes? Interesting.
![]()
That’s because you don’t have tom as your mod anymore. Poor Victim.Grassroots is always the way to go.
gd, Moogles, if "thinking is hard" I can see why you didn't anticipate the rather obvious implication of calling me a homophobe in a thread about little gibby.Ghee says: "Thinking is HARD!!!"
You should maybe adopt the AllorNothing mode of posting and just do mostly asterisks, so people can only assume what you're posting is really, really stupid ... they can't prove it.
I know you want Gibbs but please don’t do him. You know how much I love you.I'll do anything if it gets us back to HROT. That loser is dead to me.
Such a great band. One of the many reasons why I love you.Grassroots is always the way to go.
gd, Moogles, if "thinking is hard" I can see why you didn't anticipate the rather obvious implication of calling me a homophobe in a thread about little gibby.That's some impressive accidental subtext. But sure, I'll keep using words. I understand why you'd prefer the asterisks, though.
Stop white knighting for Gibbs. He’s the problem, he needs to go away. Why is that so hard to understand?I'm only being helpful, guys. You're welcome. If you want to go back to the other board ... and I'm sure we ALL are in agreement that's for the best ... you need to act like reasonable adults. Or, at least, reasonable middle schoolers. Stop the bullying, the fighting, the offensive crap. It seems as if a few of you are intent on sabotaging the chances that get to go back to the Iowa board. You can thank me later.
Nah, I'm enjoying this place too much.
Stop white knighting for Gibbs. He’s the problem, he needs to go away. Why is that so hard to understand?
I mostly agree. I'm pretty much over all the infighting, arguing, name-calling, etc. I think the broader point, in this particular case, is the history involving one particular poster. Regardless of the validity of the allegations, we all know what the perceived issue was, what actions the site owner took, and what it will take to return. It's my understanding that if HROT posters can exercise self-control here, that will benefit us when/if we're able to return. As I've stated before, I have no problem having a dialogue with anyone who wants to engage reasonably. For me, it's not the varying views...it's the manner in which someone chooses to engage. I think it's rather obvious who wants to flame/troll the board and who doesn't.I'm only being helpful, guys. You're welcome. If you want to go back to the other board ... and I'm sure we ALL are in agreement that's for the best ... you need to act like reasonable adults. Or, at least, reasonable middle schoolers. Stop the bullying, the fighting, the offensive crap. It seems as if a few of you are intent on sabotaging the chances that get to go back to the Iowa board. You can thank me later.

I’m glad lunchy and I don’t have to worry about anal warts. Those things have burned off long ago with all our friction!Gibbs, you're like anal warts ... no one wants them around, but picking at them all day isn't going to help anyone.
So you DO get it! Why all the fuss then? (wait for it)Gibbs, you're like anal warts ... no one wants them around, but picking at them all day isn't going to help anyone.
Ahhh, so I left you out. THAT'S why you're so upset.Except I called you a homophobe because you tried to get everyone here to be focused on tits, which would be exclusionary to those who don't like tits ... such as a homosexual man. You following, sparkles? This is why you're semi-retarded at age 60. It's good to see that you're still able to understand that, based on the genetics you passed down to them, that your grandchildren will have nothing, and shouldn't exist. End the bloodline. Preferably legally, but ... you know ... desperate times and all.
This is the type of stuff that cracks me up. He doesn’t have an issue with the person that creates the threads like this one but he has an issue with the person defending himself in this and all the other threads exactly like this one.I mostly agree. I'm pretty much over all the infighting, arguing, name-calling, etc. I think the broader point, in this particular case, is the history involving one particular poster. Regardless of the validity of the allegations, we all know what the perceived issue was, what actions the site owner took, and what it will take to return. It's my understanding that if HROT poarwea can exercise self-control here, that will benefit us when/if we're able to return. As I've stated before, I have no problem having a dialogue with anyone who wants to engage reasonably. For me, it's not the varying views...it's the manner in which someone chooses to engage. I think it's rather obvious who wants to flame/troll the board and who doesn't.
To your main point...sure, Ghee's methods are a little unhinged, but the underlying point is not.
I'm doing my part.
View attachment 1405272
Sure you do, Vlad.
I mostly agree. I'm pretty much over all the infighting, arguing, name-calling, etc. I think the broader point, in this particular case, is the history involving one particular poster. Regardless of the validity of the allegations, we all know what the perceived issue was, what actions the site owner took, and what it will take to return. It's my understanding that if HROT posters can exercise self-control here, that will benefit us when/if we're able to return. As I've stated before, I have no problem having a dialogue with anyone who wants to engage reasonably. For me, it's not the varying views...it's the manner in which someone chooses to engage. I think it's rather obvious who wants to flame/troll the board and who doesn't.
To your main point...sure, Ghee's methods are a little unhinged, but the underlying point is not.
I'm doing my part.
View attachment 1405272
So you DO get it! Why all the fuss then? (wait for it)
Ahhh, so I left you out. THAT'S why you're so upset.Well, now that I understand the source of the trauma, I'll try to be more inclusive next time.
![]()
![]()
Says the person triggered by anything non-MAGA. Have you ever once started a thread that doesn't involve your fears?Good Lord, you really take pride in being a snowflake.
Fingers crossed the on3 built-in gif button doesn't jack with my algorithm. I'd hate to turn out like JHP, PedoMaller and others like them.I appreciate you googling men on my behalf, but seeing as I’m straight, it’s wasted on me. My guess is your algorithm is already so disturbing that these searches will actually make it more mainstream.
Again, I appreciate the effort, and I’m sure your heart is in the right place, but it’s still clear that, for Ghee, Thinking is HARD!!

Says the person triggered by anything non-MAGA. Have you ever once started a thread that doesn't involve your fears?
It’s like the gift that keeps on giving.
So, your point is that pointing out cult behavior involves "my fears?"
Says the poster that is ignoring a couple of posters that all happen to not be in a lib cult. LMAO, LOLSays the person triggered by anything non-MAGA. Have you ever once started a thread that doesn't involve your fears?
If you'd like to have a sincere debate about a specific topic, knox, please let me know. Start the thread, tag me, and we'll see how it goes. Otherwise, I have no desire to engage in nonsensical back-n-forth with you.Use your words... lol... See the analogy there?
The commie cult? No that's you. I just don't know yet if you're an actual Russian bot, or just a commie wannabe. You're certainly not a real American. Beta commie supporter.LOL.... Tommy Boy, you are one of those in the cult.
Again, projection, Andrei.They cannot help themselves. It's become compulsive at this point. Funniest part? They don't realize it.
care to wager if he takes u up on this?If you'd like to have a sincere debate about a specific topic, knox, please let me know. Start the thread, tag me, and we'll see how it goes. Otherwise, I have no desire to engage in nonsensical back-n-forth with you.
@m.knox and then when he doesn’t like your response, he’ll act like you’re the problem and put you on ignore. All while pretending to be some easy to get along with innocent poster. LolIf you'd like to have a sincere debate about a specific topic, knox, please let me know. Start the thread, tag me, and we'll see how it goes. Otherwise, I have no desire to engage in nonsensical back-n-forth with you.
Weird comment considering I have no clue who Mango Mussolini is."He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named" has been on my ignore list forever. So have several of his waterboys posting here. If all you have to offer is a full-throated defense of Mango Mussolini... you're out. Pretty simple.
Live look at little gibby tomorrow."He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named" has been on my ignore list forever. So have several of his waterboys posting here. If all you have to offer is a full-throated defense of Mango Mussolini... you're out. Pretty simple.
Congrats on the biggest b!tch post I’ve ever seen on ANY message board. There is no way in hell you are a biological male.Is in full effect. (don't even respond to him in this thread)
Three things should unite this board
1. Tits! (and dicks for Moogy & Huey)
2. Football
3. Ignoring "He who shall not be named"
This will have to be an all-in effort from Iowa, FSU, Clemson, Libtards, MAGAs and Indies! LFG!
View attachment 1405251
Tiger Illustrated
Where every Clemson Football newcomer stands heading into game week
Tiger Illustrated
TI TRENDING: Our latest at defensive tackle
Tiger Illustrated
What we were just told about Clemson's quarterback battle
On3
Power Four at crossroads over NFL returnees as SEC president warns of 'mockery,' Big Ten approves ban
Tiger Illustrated
What we are hearing on Gideon Davidson and Chris Johnson