Continued Mass Election Fraud

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
Democrats gameplan is very apparent.



States already playing games with Trump administration as Wisconsin Election Commission tells DOJ it's not responsible for keeping NONCITIZENS OFF VOTER ROLLS.

No more games. If they don't comply, arrest and prosecute them, or it will never stop.

Election integrity standards to secure our elections are non-negotiable, they are a must, and the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scrubby

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113


This is:

U.S. Senator Thomas Hawley Tuberville drops the Mother of All Bombs. 🔥🔥

“They have a system that they could win elections.”

We have over a DOZEN people in the House and the Senate now who were elected ILLEGALLY.

All these voting machines are from Venezuela, and they’re all rigged.

Democrats STOLE $2 TRILLION from the CARES Act—all in the name of COVID—to pay off their debts because they had stolen so much money that they could no longer function.

“We’re talking $30–40B for California. $30–40B for New York. Same thing for Chicago, etc. It is a disaster. Folks, you are being stolen blind!”
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113


When I discovered this for myself in my research and investigations beginning in 2021, I found most people I told this to simply didn't believe.

"Our arrogant and power-hungry county officials STEP OUT OF THE WAY and YIELD CONTROL of THEIR OWN ELECTIONS to a buncha OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS from the machine companies? What kinda ******** are you tryin' ta sell me here, CATES?!"

Well...yeah.

Yeah, that IS exactly what I am telling you.

They DO step out of the way and they DO let the outside contractors run the county elections for them.

They are bound by CONTRACTS to do this.

And all the machine companies are CIA FRONTS.

Willingly or not, knowingly or not, all the private contractors sent in to manage the county elections are CIA affiliates, doin' what they're ordered to do.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113


Tarrant County, Texas, "BALLOT MULE" caught on police body camera admitting MASSIVE Democrat ballot harvesting operation tied to elections between 2016 to 2020. He was paid $200 a ballot and even bought a moped by Democrats to help commit voter fraud.

Deborah Peoples, former Tarrant County Democratic Party chairwoman, election board/commission member, candidate, along with her fraud operation, were DIRECTLY IMPLICATED, stating her group "hasn't lost a vote in 11 years," and wins every campaign they back. I wonder why...

Charles Jackson was paid to target and harvest mail-in ballots, specifically from elderly voters on Fort Worth’s north side. Jackson describes tricking elderly people into signing pre-filled ballots by pretending they were just "confirming information." He was caught in 2016, and then caught again in 2020, and was let off easy with help from Democrats.

Jackson also names Stuart Clegg, director at The Peoples Group, former TCDP executive director, and Peoples' campaign manager, as the person who bonded him out of jail, told him not to talk, and put him under a gag order.

The footage was presented as evidence of organized Democrat ballot harvesting in Tarrant County, Texas, involving payments to mules and targeting vulnerable voters to flip votes.

Jackson references prior arrests tied to a voter fraud ring and claims protection from Democrat operatives shielded him from full consequences.

This is the raw body cam footage containing direct proof of Democrat election interference in Texas. These same Democrat ballot harvesting operations are happening throughout the country. We have a HUGE voter fraud problem in this country, led by Democrats and crooked NGOs.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
Wow!!!



This is:

What Democrats call democracy!

Wing Kwan Wong, a noncitizen, appointed to the San Francisco Elections Commission.

Think about that… a Chinese “noncitizen,” who isn’t legally allowed to vote herself, is now serving on a body that oversees elections.

A Chinese national has joined a seven-member commission that oversees and creates policies for the city’s Department of Elections.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Allornothing

SoProudNole

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2004
139,413
2,845
113
Wow!!!



This is:

What Democrats call democracy!

Wing Kwan Wong, a noncitizen, appointed to the San Francisco Elections Commission.

Think about that… a Chinese “noncitizen,” who isn’t legally allowed to vote herself, is now serving on a body that oversees elections.

A Chinese national has joined a seven-member commission that oversees and creates policies for the city’s Department of Elections.


Is there any nuance whatsoever to any of your thinking? You're a smooth brained puke.

  • Wong can serve as a commissioner because San Francisco voters approved a charter amendment in 2020 allowing noncitizens to serve on city commissions. President of the Board of Supervisors Aaron Peskin said Wong’s appointment aligns with what San Francisco voters want and will help bring “a diversity of voices that represent different segments of society to the conversation.” [SF Standard, 2/21/24]
  • Immigrant rights activist Wing Kwan (Kelly) Wong is reportedly the first noncitizen appointed to the San Francisco Elections Commission. Wong legally immigrated to the U.S. from Hong Kong — where she participated in pro-democracy protests against China — for graduate school in 2019. In her application to the San Francisco Election Commission, Wong said witnessing the “gradual erosion of freedom” in Hong Kong inspired her to apply for the position. [SF Standard, 2/21/24; San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee Agenda Packet no. 240013, 1/22/24, page 16]
  • Attacks on Wong come as right-wing outlets try to tie Chinese migrants to the great replacement conspiracy theory ahead of the 2024 election. Outlets like Fox News are drawing on out-of-context statistics about Chinese citizens who are seeking asylum and national security fears about China to push the white nationalist conspiracy theory, which claims liberal elites are encouraging nonwhite immigration to replace white people and ultimately control the country. They have suggested Democrats are working with the Chinese Communist Party to drown out Republican votes. [Media Matters, 1/12/24; America’s Voice, 3/23/23]
 

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,798
13,061
113
Wow!!!



This is:

What Democrats call democracy!

Wing Kwan Wong, a noncitizen, appointed to the San Francisco Elections Commission.

Think about that… a Chinese “noncitizen,” who isn’t legally allowed to vote herself, is now serving on a body that oversees elections.

A Chinese national has joined a seven-member commission that oversees and creates policies for the city’s Department of Elections.

How does this **** continue to happen?

Is that Eric Swallows Well’s *****?😂😂😂

This is the question that needs to be asked/answered. If indeed, it is true, who appointed her? That is the answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
Is there any nuance whatsoever to any of your thinking? You're a smooth brained puke.

  • Wong can serve as a commissioner because San Francisco voters approved a charter amendment in 2020 allowing noncitizens to serve on city commissions. President of the Board of Supervisors Aaron Peskin said Wong’s appointment aligns with what San Francisco voters want and will help bring “a diversity of voices that represent different segments of society to the conversation.” [SF Standard, 2/21/24]
  • Immigrant rights activist Wing Kwan (Kelly) Wong is reportedly the first noncitizen appointed to the San Francisco Elections Commission. Wong legally immigrated to the U.S. from Hong Kong — where she participated in pro-democracy protests against China — for graduate school in 2019. In her application to the San Francisco Election Commission, Wong said witnessing the “gradual erosion of freedom” in Hong Kong inspired her to apply for the position. [SF Standard, 2/21/24; San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee Agenda Packet no. 240013, 1/22/24, page 16]
  • Attacks on Wong come as right-wing outlets try to tie Chinese migrants to the great replacement conspiracy theory ahead of the 2024 election. Outlets like Fox News are drawing on out-of-context statistics about Chinese citizens who are seeking asylum and national security fears about China to push the white nationalist conspiracy theory, which claims liberal elites are encouraging nonwhite immigration to replace white people and ultimately control the country. They have suggested Democrats are working with the Chinese Communist Party to drown out Republican votes. [Media Matters, 1/12/24; America’s Voice, 3/23/23]
Its called communist infiltration at work.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113


Can I pull back the curtain and reveal the whole truth?

This is another huge bombshell report by John Solomon.
The dates are important.

“From 2004 to 2020, the U.S. intelligence community monitored plans by the Venezuelan leadership to electronically manipulate their country’s own voting machines, including the use of substituting false votes, in order to secure victory for the ruling socialists.”

“President Donald Trump, who declassified intelligence information on those plans and released them to the public on Thursday, says the Venezuelan capabilities are evidence that American voting systems need to be better secured.
The Venezuelan plots specifically raised alarm bells in the United States because Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez collaborated with Smartmatic, a voting machine company that in 2005 acquired the U.S.-based Sequoia Voting Systems, to develop them.”

justthenews.com/government/sec…

Here’s the full story that most Americans still are not prepared to accept.

The CIA wasn’t “monitoring” Venezuela’s development of voting machines to steal elections.
They were “assisting” them.

Does anybody believe that the CIA was “monitoring” this Venezuelan operation and then just turned a “blind eye” when Venezuela owned Smartmatic “acquired the U.S.-based Sequoia Voting Systems?”

“IF” Chavez was such an enemy to the American people, then why would President Bush allow Smartmatic to make that purchase?

Do you want to know the TRUTH?

The constant threats between George W. Bush and Chavez were all for “show.”

The Bush family has had deep ties to Venezuela for many decades and so has the CIA.
Venezuela became a hub for illegal drug trafficking, shadow fleet oil sales and money laundering through a “closed financial system,” because that’s how the CIA/shadow government funds itself “outside of Congressional oversight.”

Did you know that Jeb Bush has long time connections to Venezuela?
Did you know that George H.W. Bush helped a Venezuelan president get elected in a “fraudulent” election back in 1973, when Jeb was working for a Houston bank in Caracas?

The Bush family is so dirty and connected to this election fraud more than people know.

Link to my article:

A Family Affair

open.substack.com/pub/badlands/p…

And don’t forget this important story from last year.

“The Office of the Director of National Intelligence obtained voting machines from Puerto Rico and probed them for security vulnerabilities, the office said in a statement to CNN Wednesday.”

“The ODNI claimed in its statement to have found “extremely concerning” cybersecurity and operational deployment practices with the voting machines in Puerto Rico but did not provide detailed evidence.
The US attorney in Puerto Rico, Homeland Security Investigations agents and an FBI supervisory special agent “facilitated the voluntary turnover of electronic voting hardware and software to ODNI for analysis,” an ODNI spokesperson said. It’s unclear exactly when the agency received and studied the voting machines.”

krdo.com/news/2026/02/0…

Everything is connected.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113


So have the Dems come up with any sort of coherent argument as to why they want our elections to remain insecure?

Or are they just sticking with the “minorities and women are too dumb to obtain ID” excuse?

Even the most brainwashed Libs don’t buy this. They know the Dems cheat, they just truly believe that the ends justify the means. They truly believe that Trump is Hitler, and therefore their cheating is righteous.

They don’t actually believe in “democracy”. They only seek power.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: PedMaller

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113


This is an important story and it reveals the “bigger picture.”

A huge voter “registration” FRAUD SCHEME was discovered in Michigan, where people admitted to being paid in gift cards for fraudulent and made up voter registrations.

Ghost voters…who don’t exist.

The FBI investigation was swept under the rug and not prosecuted.

Here’s where Trump is peeling back the curtain to reveal the bigger picture.

Trump has now called on the FBI and DOJ to “reopen” that investigation.

Isn’t the statute of limitations expired?

The statute of limitations renews after every criminal offense connected to the original crime “conspiracy.”

RICO investigation.

And guess what?

This reopened investigation is a “small part” of the nationwide “conspiracy” by the democrats to steal elections.

It’s an appetizer.

Do you think that this was only happening in Michigan?

Who squashed this original investigation?

I think her name might be Nikki Floris.

Tick Tock
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,271
6,122
113
So have the Dems come up with any sort of coherent argument as to why they want our elections to remain insecure?

When you condense everything down to it's essence, it appears that the Dem position has become one where they will acknowledge that the potential for voter fraud exists, but they don't believe that the problem has yet to manifest itself to a level that would warrant addressing it,.. Not sure where the red line is for Dems, or why they appear so unconcerned about voters losing confidence in the integrity of the process,... This confidence will be harder to regain than to hold on to.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,786
28,172
113
When you condense everything down to it's essence, it appears that the Dem position has become one where they will acknowledge that the potential for voter fraud exists, but they don't believe that the problem has yet to manifest itself to a level that would warrant addressing it,.. Not sure where the red line is for Dems, or why they appear so unconcerned about voters losing confidence in the integrity of the process,... This confidence will be harder to regain than to hold on to.
Why did they lose confidence???

Yes a miniscule amount of voter fraud exists but's it's almost always detectable and caught. The SAVE Act is supposed to keep non-citizens from voting but we know from the Heritage Foundation that there were only 77 attempts by non-citizens to vote between 1999-2023. That's about 3 people per year so do you really think it's reasonable to get 100 million people re-registered IN PERSON before the mid-terms to keep those three people from attempting to vote?

And don't forget what's also in the bill - no mail-in ballots without pre-authorization of a hardship, allowing the least trustworthy government in our history to cull each states voter rolls and penalties of up to five years in prison if an election worker accidentally accepts a non-approved document.

Voter ID is one thing but that's the least of it. If that's all you want, we can go along with it but not this obvious attempt at voter suppression so that Mango can't be held accountable for his corruption. Stop lying about the Dem position and look at the log in your own eye.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Scrubby

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,271
6,122
113
Why did they lose confidence???

Tens of millions of illegals allowed into the country faster than they could be accounted for, combined with the loose actions of a handful of states unwilling to manage the issuance of state level documents that can potentially provide access to voter registration... Allowing the door to a restricted area to remain unlocked, creates the assumption that when things get overly hectic, unauthorized people are probably slipping through.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,786
28,172
113
Tens of millions of illegals allowed into the country faster than they could be accounted for, combined with the loose actions of a handful of states unwilling to manage the issuance of state level documents that can potentially provide access to voter registration... Allowing the door to a restricted area to remain unlocked, creates the assumption that when things get overly hectic, unauthorized people are probably slipping through.
Let me help you out. Illegals aren't allowed to vote and since there are only 3 on average that "attempt" to vote per year, you shouldn't want to penalize 100 million innocent people because of your paranoia. When Republicans have lost, it's because they deserved to lose, like they do in the mid-terms, not because Jose committed a felony.
 

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,271
6,122
113
Let me help you out. Illegals aren't allowed to vote and since there are only 3 on average that "attempt" to vote per year, you shouldn't want to penalize 100 million innocent people because of your paranoia. When Republicans have lost, it's because they deserved to lose, like they do in the mid-terms, not because Jose committed a felony.

The act of voter registration in many states addresses the requirement of citizen only voting for federal races simply by asking the applicant to check a box that says "I am a US citizen". No form of documented proof is required,... Anyone getting past this point is a registered voter, and not likely to be further scrutinized... This means that your suggested total head count of (3) has no basis in fact.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,786
28,172
113
The act of voter registration in many states addresses the requirement of citizen only voting for federal races simply by asking the applicant to check a box that says "I am a US citizen". No form of documented proof is required,... Anyone getting past this point is a registered voter, and not likely to be further scrutinized... This means that your suggested total head count of (3) has no basis in fact.
  1. A minority of states do require documentary proof, at least for some registration channels — Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming have such laws, though enforcement varies and some are partial (e.g., only for new registrants, or only at DMV offices). Factually
  2. "Not likely to be further scrutinized" undersells post-registration checks. States regularly cross-reference voter registration lists with other government databases that may contain citizenship information as part of routine list-maintenance. Florida, for example, runs an automated system checking registrations against DMV records, and flags applicants whose DMV file suggests non-citizenship, requiring them to submit further documentation. Virginia and Iowa have authorized similar cross-referencing with DMV or federal immigration databases. R Street InstituteLegalClarity
  3. This is a live, moving target — federal proposals and executive actions in 2026 are pushing to change the landscape, and further shifts are possible after March–April 2026. Factually

So the claim captures the legal baseline correctly (attestation, not documents, is what federal law requires) but implies a uniformity and lack of downstream checking that doesn't hold everywhere — some states do demand documents, and many use database cross-checks after the fact rather than leaving registrants totally unscrutinized.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
Let me help you out. Illegals aren't allowed to vote and since there are only 3 on average that "attempt" to vote per year, you shouldn't want to penalize 100 million innocent people because of your paranoia. When Republicans have lost, it's because they deserved to lose, like they do in the mid-terms, not because Jose committed a felony.
Over 250k illegals confirmed to just have been registered to vote in just 4 states checked but they do not actually vote??? Duh.............
 

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,656
5,127
113
Let me help you out. Illegals aren't allowed to vote and since there are only 3 on average that "attempt" to vote per year, you shouldn't want to penalize 100 million innocent people because of your paranoia. When Republicans have lost, it's because they deserved to lose, like they do in the mid-terms, not because Jose committed a felony.
You can tell its a bad faith argument because the first thing mentioned occurred after the 2020 election ("tens of millions of illegals allowed into the country")

the thing that killed confidence in elections occurred after the actual election they are still disputing. It is impossible to take this seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
That was an impossible outright lie and its why they won't let the states see the data. This regime is pure evil. Wake up parasite.
Dude...the states have their own data already. Its the blue states refusing to share their voter rolls with the feds. 250K is a confirmed number.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ilovewrestling

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,656
5,127
113
Dude...the states have their own data already. Its the blue states refusing to share their voter rolls with the feds. 250K is a confirmed number.
it is absolutely NOT a confirmed number


and I realize you won't read that article. I posted for the people with actual functional brains who are curious about those claims.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
it is absolutely NOT a confirmed number


and I realize you won't read that article. I posted for the people with actual functional brains who are curious about those claims.
I just skimmed over the article and there is no conclusive information provided refuting the number. If i am wrong then cut and paste it right here. Come on smart guy with a self described functional brain. Im here all night.
 

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,656
5,127
113
I just skimmed over the article and there is no conclusive information provided refuting the number. If i am wrong then cut and paste it right here. Come on smart guy with a self described functional brain. Im here all night.
it specifically points out that the number is an estimate based on preliminary review of incomplete data

it is in no way "confirmed"
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
it specifically points out that the number is an estimate based on preliminary review of incomplete data

it is in no way "confirmed"
The government posted the number. They arent going to send a print out genius. I would say the full number over all 50 states is immensely greater. Theres a reason multiple states are fighting til the end to not let the feds get the data.
 

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,656
5,127
113
The government posted the number. They arent going to send a print out genius. I would say the full number over all 50 states is immensely greater. Theres a reason multiple states are fighting til the end to not let the feds get the data.
and the number the govt posted is basically a guesstimate, using incomplete data

in that article , they cite a previous, similar effort in Florida that began with preliminary number of 180,000 noncitizens registered to vote. Once they investigated, the confirmed number was 85.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
and the number the govt posted is basically a guesstimate, using incomplete data

in that article , they cite a previous, similar effort in Florida that began with preliminary number of 180,000 noncitizens registered to vote. Once they investigated, the confirmed number was 85.
Ok. You have your opinion on it and I have mine.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ilovewrestling

yoshi121374

Heisman
Jan 26, 2006
13,143
22,773
113
Ok. You have your opinion on it and I have mine.

And your opinions have a pretty terrible record of being right. Basically similar to the MAGA election court case record.

How many of your Bombshell, Smoking Gun, Gamechanger, etc articles have been proven in a court to have been true? How many Gateway Pundit "articles" were we subjected to that were laughably fake?

At some point you are going to realize you were lied to and manipulated.
 
Last edited:

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,410
113
And your opinions have a pretty terrible record of being right. Basically similar to the MAGA election court case record.

How many of your Bombshell, Smoking Gun, Gamechanger, etc articles have been proven on a court to have been true? How many Gateway Pundit "articles" were we suspected to that were laughably fake?

At some point you are going to realize you were lied to and manipulated.
Its not over yoshi.
 

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,271
6,122
113
  1. A minority of states do require documentary proof, at least for some registration channels — Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming have such laws, though enforcement varies and some are partial (e.g., only for new registrants, or only at DMV offices). Factually
  2. "Not likely to be further scrutinized" undersells post-registration checks. States regularly cross-reference voter registration lists with other government databases that may contain citizenship information as part of routine list-maintenance. Florida, for example, runs an automated system checking registrations against DMV records, and flags applicants whose DMV file suggests non-citizenship, requiring them to submit further documentation. Virginia and Iowa have authorized similar cross-referencing with DMV or federal immigration databases. R Street InstituteLegalClarity
  3. This is a live, moving target — federal proposals and executive actions in 2026 are pushing to change the landscape, and further shifts are possible after March–April 2026. Factually

So the claim captures the legal baseline correctly (attestation, not documents, is what federal law requires) but implies a uniformity and lack of downstream checking that doesn't hold everywhere — some states do demand documents, and many use database cross-checks after the fact rather than leaving registrants totally unscrutinized.

Thanks for confirming everything I said...
 
  • Like
Reactions: PedMaller

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,656
5,127
113
Ok. You have your opinion on it and I have mine.
well, it's not "mine" and it's not "an opinion"...it's analysis and review of the available data, similar past efforts, and input from experts

your's is basically just "whatever the federal govnerment says is correct"...let's not act like you put any kind of thought or effort into developing this
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,786
28,172
113
Thanks for confirming everything I said...
Yeah, that's not what happened. You said after registering they would no longer be scrutinized. I proved to you that there are often post-voting cross-checks to make sure they they are in fact citizens - feel free to read again. But your paranoia stems from incorrectly believing they would all be votes for Dems, and that's not the case.



The act of voter registration in many states addresses the requirement of citizen only voting for federal races simply by asking the applicant to check a box that says "I am a US citizen". No form of documented proof is required,... Anyone getting past this point is a registered voter, and not likely to be further scrutinized... This means that your suggested total head count of (3) has no basis in fact.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,786
28,172
113
The government posted the number. They arent going to send a print out genius. I would say the full number over all 50 states is immensely greater. Theres a reason multiple states are fighting til the end to not let the feds get the data.
The corrupt government that can't be trusted posted those numbers Growls, derr. Experts and state officials all say the same thing - these are certainly old lists filled with people who were non-citizens at one time who have since been naturalized, people whose names match non-citizens and people who didn't understand they weren't supposed to register when they got their driver's license but never voted. And you should be especially wary if they won't share those lists with the states because it appears their only agenda was to use those fake numbers as an excuse to impose restrictions and/or criminalize election officials - like Nazis would do.