To a small degree sure. They definitely aren’t as socialist as Trump’s government taking an ownership stake in private corporations.
To me it is a balancing act. I believe some social programs are good (Medicare for all makes my list), and some regulation is necessary, but most of the time I want government out of private enterprise decision making.
The progressive movement goes too far IMO. Their hearts are in the right place, but the policies are often ineffective (often because of the lack of good signaling mechanism on what is working and what is not).
To be honest, I always consider the government ownership of the means of production to be communistic whereas the redistribution of wealth without government ownership to be socialistic.
Government ownership of a chip manufacturer = communism.
Trump Accounts = socialism.
But that is just splitting hairs.
The thing is that many progressive social programs take years or decades to bear fruit. So there needs to be a level of commitment to see them through.
The majority of the beneficial aspects of SNAP outside of immediate non-starvation (yeah that is the big one) for children are not seen until later in life - kids who aren't hungry do better in school, stay out of trouble more frequently, go to some sort of higher education or vocational training... But the real effect is on that child's children and grandchildren. Breaking cycles takes generations.
Now, yeah, like anything there are wasteful programs or programs that have benefits that are less tangible but federal governments shouldn't be run like businesses looking to turn a profit - just to steward our tax dollars in the best ways they can.