Next stop the White House?
Yes he will and after that, I believe he may have bigger things in mind. If you read social media, there are thousands of people pushing him to run for president.
I met him at a private fundraiser last month and he's an awesome guy who has a bright, bright future ahead of him.
This is the publisher for the Bulwark.
He's speaking directly to people like you.Assoff is a total loser. Never was legitimately elected. He will lose conclusively this fall.

Just wait til the Fulton trial starts.He's speaking directly to people like you.
Ossoff: “The election deniers, they tell a lie so absurd, and therefore so debasing to tell, that the act of telling it proves the teller's total and humiliating submission."
Conclusively my *** - he's going to waltz right into it.
View attachment 1335438
What Fulton trial? The one you imagine?Just wait til the Fulton trial starts.
We’ve been “just waiting” for over half a decade now.Just wait til the Fulton trial starts.
Ossoff tells us the real reason Fulton County is being targeted.Just wait til the Fulton trial starts.
just an aside...there was a thread posted I believe by WWJD that discussed the "bribes" in politics...so everyone is aware, Ossoff has received about $800,000 in PAC contributions this cycle and $33,500 in direct and earmarked money from AIPAC. And that's only fraction of the money he has received..I think Ossoff will win handily.
AIPAC attacks him, they do not donate to him,.just an aside...there was a thread posted I believe by WWJD that discussed the "bribes" in politics...so everyone is aware, Ossoff has received about $800,000 in PAC contributions this cycle and $33,500 in direct and earmarked money from AIPAC. And that's only fraction of the money he has received..
Now, while we're relishing the election and future of Senator Ossoff, should we putting our support behind someone who is openly being "bribed"?
I might have to stand corrected...I read one site from Google that had the $33,500, but can't find it... but, not to be left empty handed...."Over his career, Senator Jon Ossoff has received a total of $770,160 from pro-Israel sources. [1]AIPAC attacks him, they do not donate to him,.
"There is no evidence that U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff is being bribed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC); in fact, the organization has actively targeted him with attack advertisements. [1]
The dynamics of his relationship with the lobbying group and campaign financing laws clarify the situation:
The Nature of Campaign Contributions vs. Bribery
- Legal Distinctions: Legally, bribery involves a corrupt quid pro quo—a specific exchange of money for an official act. No such investigations or charges exist regarding Ossoff and AIPAC. [1, 2]
- Corporate PAC Ban: Ossoff has a strict policy against accepting money from corporate PACs and has even co-sponsored the Ban Corporate PACs Act to eliminate them from federal elections altogether. [1, 2]
- Minimal Lobbying Monies: According to tracking data compiled by OpenSecrets, Ossoff has historically received negligible financial backing from the broader pro-Israel sector—such as just $2,979 in the 2022 cycle, coming entirely from individuals or affiliated employee groups rather than the PAC itself. [1, 2]
Opposition and Attacks from AIPAC
Rather than working together, Ossoff and AIPAC have been in open political conflict: [1]
Critics of the American campaign finance system often argue that high-spending groups like AIPAC use immense financial influence—such as spending millions in primary challenges against incumbents—to shape U.S. policy. However, in Ossoff's case, that financial pressure has been used against him as a political adversary rather than to support him.
- Voting History: In late 2024, Ossoff voted alongside progressive lawmakers to block certain U.S. weapons transfers to Israel. [1, 2]
- AIPAC Ad Campaign: In response to his voting record, AIPAC funded and released a targeted ad campaign blasting Ossoff and other lawmakers. [1]
- Public Rebukes: In 2025, AIPAC sent blistering communications to Jewish supporters titled “Jon Ossoff is Failing our Community,” publicly condemning him for his foreign policy stances and delay in public messaging during Middle Eastern conflicts. [1, 2]
Ossoff AIPAC
Well sure but your post implied that he was bribed by AIPAC and corporate PACS, neither which are true. He is probably the least corrupt/least bribed senators as he has spent his entire adult career fighting corruption, including before he got into politics.I might have to stand corrected...I read one site from Google that had the $33,500, but can't find it... but, not to be left empty handed...."Over his career, Senator Jon Ossoff has received a total of $770,160 from pro-Israel sources. [1]
This total comprises:
These totals reflect contributions from individuals and political action committees (PACs) classified by groups like Track AIPAC as connected to the broader pro-Israel or "Israel Lobby" network. They represent funds associated with organizations such as DMFI, JAC, and J Street, rather than direct donations by AIPAC's official PAC"
- PAC Donations: $667,891
- Independent Expenditures: $102,269 [1]
But, that wasn't the point of my post. The original thread, was based on the fact that there's too much money in elections. And went on to point out the "bribes" that go to our elected officials.....that there is a $1,000 return for $1 contributed. So I just thought I'd point out that while we're canonizing Sen Ossoff on one hand, that he also falls into the category that we are putting all our elected officials, that of being bribed and accepting those bribes.
Oh, and as I posted, there is too much money in politics.
let's be clear here...go back and read wwjd post on the best ROI in america....while he's pointing out Israel and corporate donations he is saying that the money in politics "bribes" politicians....well Ossoff takes money from PACS...therefore by definition, according to the post then Ossoff is guilty of exactly what the original thread proposes.Well sure but your post implied that he was bribed by AIPAC and corporate PACS, neither which are true. He is probably the least corrupt/least bribed senators as he has spent his entire adult career fighting corruption, including before he got into politics.
Because Ossoff has a pledge against accepting money from corporate PACs, the PAC funds he accepts come from: [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Proportion: PAC money accounts for roughly 0.57% to 1.3% of his total fundraising. By comparison, the average U.S. Senator relies on PACs for about 7% of their total campaign budget. [1, 2, 3]
- Ideological & Leadership PACs: These include Democratic leadership funds, progressive political groups, and issue-based advocacy committees.
- Labor & Trade PACs: Credit unions, labor unions, and professional associations
Driven by Small-Dollar Donors
The overwhelming majority of Ossoff's funding comes from everyday individuals rather than political action committees. Over 53% of his multi-million-dollar haul is powered strictly by grassroots, small-dollar donors giving $200 or less. [1, 2]
Ultimately, while he does accept hundreds of thousands of dollars from aligned political and labor PACs, he remains one of the least PAC-dependent incumbents in the U.S. Senate. [1]
Ossoff: "The president was so humiliated in Hormuz he threw his toys out the stroller and refused to sign the affordable housing bill. That's after he gave some felon donor a no bid contract for the reflecting pool and it filled up with algae, which for some reason required the deployment of the National Guard. And then because of his war and tariffs, inflation rose to over 4%. He promised to bring down prices on day one, do you remember that?"
I would be more impressed if he talked about what he's going to do as senator as opposed to just bashing trump. What's his position on immigration and those in the country illegal, where does he stand on election integrity, what is he going to do about lowering prices, etc....He is impressive.
Yep. He is for real. We need about 99 more of that type to fully stock the Senate. Then, 365 in the House.He is impressive.
I would be more impressed if he talked about what he's going to do as senator as opposed to just bashing trump. What's his position on immigration and those in the country illegal, where does he stand on election integrity, what is he going to do about lowering prices, etc....
I personally think the democrat strategy of a platform of being anti trump is not a good idea. But, that's just my opinion.
At the moment, there's no bigger priority than putting a check on Trump and investigating his corruption, which he has repeatedly said he will do.I would be more impressed if he talked about what he's going to do as senator as opposed to just bashing trump. What's his position on immigration and those in the country illegal, where does he stand on election integrity, what is he going to do about lowering prices, etc....
I personally think the democrat strategy of a platform of being anti trump is not a good idea. But, that's just my opinion.
electjon.com
Preach!
False equivalency.So I just thought I'd point out that while we're canonizing Sen Ossoff on one hand, that he also falls into the category that we are putting all our elected officials, that of being bribed and accepting those bribes.
Spot on.I there is too much money in politics.
DA DOO DOO DOOjust an aside...there was a thread posted I believe by WWJD that discussed the "bribes" in politics...so everyone is aware, Ossoff has received about $800,000 in PAC contributions this cycle and $33,500 in direct and earmarked money from AIPAC. And that's only fraction of the money he has received..
Now, while we're relishing the election and future of Senator Ossoff, should we putting our support behind someone who is openly being "bribed"?
ok false equivalency...from the OP, people who accept legal PAC campaign contributions are accepting "bribes.. Sen Ossoff accepts PAC contributions but he doesn't accept bribes"...he's different....makes sense??False equivalency.
Spot on.
How does Ossoff compare with the guys you support?let's be clear here...go back and read wwjd post on the best ROI in america....while he's pointing out Israel and corporate donations he is saying that the money in politics "bribes" politicians....well Ossoff takes money from PACS...therefore by definition, according to the post then Ossoff is guilty of exactly what the original thread proposes.
Oh and I'm not accepting corporate PACs, he accepts money from the DSCC...the DSCC gets money from corporate PACs,,,I know, because I was the one in my company signing off on the contributions...
You're not talking guilty or innocent in the taking of "bribes", you're bringing up degree of guilt.
By the way, I don't accept the concept of a political donation being a bribe. I think it's a dumb, uninformed comment. Unfortunately our political system runs on money and politicians have to have it in order to mount campaigns. And as I've pointed out, for every individual or PAC who makes a contribution to a politician - like Ossoff - there is an equal and opposite individual or PAC with an equal and opposite position making a donation.
EDIT: don't be misled by the reporting information.....These guys all get money from basically the same sources...Ossoff might not take corporate PAC money, but he'll take the same amount of money from the same people who would contribute to the corporate PAC as individual contributions. Same thing Bernie Sanders does. Bernie won't take money from a PAC, so the company has to go get individual checks, which would normally go the a PAC, for Bernie's campaign. And I'm not singling out either Ossoff or Sanders it's just the way of the world. I worked for a company where half of our Congressional reps wouldn't accept PAC money. But every year they'd come to me for company contributions. So I'd go to the execs making $200,000 or more, get their $500 - $1000 checks, put them together and hand them to the Member's finance chair. It's all a game.
Did you look it up?I would be more impressed if he talked about what he's going to do as senator as opposed to just bashing trump. What's his position on immigration and those in the country illegal, where does he stand on election integrity, what is he going to do about lowering prices, etc....
I personally think the democrat strategy of a platform of being anti trump is not a good idea. But, that's just my opinion.
He doesn't just bash trump.I would be more impressed if he talked about what he's going to do as senator as opposed to just bashing trump. What's his position on immigration and those in the country illegal, where does he stand on election integrity, what is he going to do about lowering prices, etc....
I personally think the democrat strategy of a platform of being anti trump is not a good idea. But, that's just my opinion.
At the moment, there's no bigger priority than putting a check on Trump and investigating his corruption, which he has repeatedly said he will do.
But if you're really interested in his platform, feel free to peruse his campaign website
![]()
Jon Ossoff – Official Campaign Website
Georgia is MAGA's #1 target in 2026. Donate now to help Jon fight back.electjon.com
At the moment, there's no bigger priority than putting a check on Trump and investigating his corruption, which he has repeatedly said he will do.
But if you're really interested in his platform, feel free to peruse his campaign website
![]()
Jon Ossoff – Official Campaign Website
Georgia is MAGA's #1 target in 2026. Donate now to help Jon fight back.electjon.com
This is getting tiresome.ok false equivalency...from the OP, people who accept legal PAC campaign contributions are accepting "bribes.. Sen Ossoff accepts PAC contributions but he doesn't accept bribes"...he's different....makes sense??
He's a fairly middle of the road moderate Democrat, but charismatic and electable af. People online or who follow politics more than most HAVE to realize that people like Ossoff are who will win elections. Not your fringe, extremist favorite candidate. I can't believe we haven't learned from the Bernie bro's sagaAnyone actually interested in Ossoff's stances could do worse than check Wikipedia. I learned that he is less progressive than I would like, but mostly a pretty good moderate.
![]()
Jon Ossoff - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I love the comparison with JFK. That's still a positive value for some of us. Not a lot of us left, but some.He's a fairly middle of the road moderate Democrat, but charismatic and electable af. People online or who follow politics more than most HAVE to realize that people like Ossoff are who will win elections. Not your fringe, extremist favorite candidate. I can't believe we haven't learned from the Bernie bro's saga
We can't let perfect be the enemy of good because he's plenty progressive enough. I know some social democrats won in NY but that's not going to work in the deep south or in a presidential campaign if he decides to throw his hat in the ring, so his policies and tone are perfect in that regard. Plus, we don't want be the extreme opposite of Trump as most Americans are squarely in the middle and that's who we need to appeal to if we want to win.Anyone actually interested in Ossoff's stances could do worse than check Wikipedia. I learned that he is less progressive than I would like, but mostly a pretty good moderate.
![]()
Jon Ossoff - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Ossoff is a far left radical who will vote in lock step with DC democrat leadership. He will just lie hard to get elected.We can't let perfect be the enemy of good because he's plenty progressive enough. I know some social democrats won in NY but that's not going to work in the deep south or in a presidential campaign if he decides to throw his hat in the ring, so his policies and tone are perfect in that regard. Plus, we don't want be the extreme opposite of Trump as most Americans are squarely in the middle and that's who we need to appeal to if we want to win.