Basketball Ron & Dylan Harper / Ace Bailey - NBA Thread

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
5,050
7,628
73
I mean when something happens for the first time in the 80 history of the sport then I would say it's a noteworthy stat. No need to take it as anything other than that.
Imagine when someone from Burma finally wins an NBA championship. Then I will get really excited . . .
 

mjjoyce51

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2012
998
1,287
88
What are you talking about? Early on in the season when Dylan was a success off the bat it came up a lot. There were quite a few of articles / tweets whatever posted with comments and the topic came up all season. Slowly the chatter died down, but every so often an NBA game commentator brings it up. It’s definitely out there as a discussion point, and Kratch is probably correct that it’ll come up again now and be discussed on national TV / radio broadcasts etc. when Dylan comes up.
By who though? A bunch of random people on Twitter and Reddit? Any legit reporters without a Rutgers/Jersey connection? We're also talking about how his run has started up the discussion again not what was happening in the beginning of the year. No doubt it was a colossal bag drop (and probably the most disappointing season of any team I'm a fan of) that probably doesn't happen with the NIL money they have this year but, so far, it's not a national story.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,428
1,879
42
By who though? A bunch of random people on Twitter and Reddit? Any legit reporters without a Rutgers/Jersey connection? We're also talking about how his run has started up the discussion again not what was happening in the beginning of the year. No doubt it was a colossal bag drop (and probably the most disappointing season of any team I'm a fan of) that probably doesn't happen with the NIL money they have this year but, so far, it's not a national story.


Dylan’s Mom says otherwise
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,420
6,407
113
Think there’s a lot of over thinking here

having OKC get to the finals over the Spurs is “better” for Rutgers

come on

to 99.999999999999999999% of the public it makes not a bit of difference

the only people who care are overly-invested-in-certain-aspects-of-sports middle-aged men. Nobody else cares.

and the only ones who matter are the super talented teenagers that we want to play for RU

you think they give a f$$k what some guy named Kratch(?) says?

they care about the $$$$ (which this has no effect either way) and they care if they can get to the NBA (and having Ace and Dylan succeed off the bat…. Well that can ONLY possibly help).

Your worry about this will fade once you realize that the only people who bring up such topics (1) have waaaay too much time on their hands and/or (2) have an anti-ru ad to grind; and no one else knows or cares about it.

waaaaaaay overthinking this
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,925
51,414
113
Think there’s a lot of over thinking here

having OKC get to the finals over the Spurs is “better” for Rutgers

come on

to 99.999999999999999999% of the public it makes not a bit of difference

the only people who care are overly-invested-in-certain-aspects-of-sports middle-aged men. Nobody else cares.

and the only ones who matter are the super talented teenagers that we want to play for RU

you think they give a f$$k what some guy named Kratch(?) says?

they care about the $$$$ (which this has no effect either way) and they care if they can get to the NBA (and having Ace and Dylan succeed off the bat…. Well that can ONLY possibly help).

Your worry about this will fade once you realize that the only people who bring up such topics (1) have waaaay too much time on their hands and/or (2) have an anti-ru ad to grind; and no one else knows or cares about it.

waaaaaaay overthinking this
We have some strange fans that need to back off the ledge.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,152
15,610
72
In 5-10 years maybe. The association of Dylan to Rutgers right now is not positive. The only way your spin could be remotely true is for someone who knows nothing about college ball. Otherwise, the narrative is - man, how could a program have a losing record with a kid like this on the roster…
We disagree, and I’m fine with that.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
The perception that everyone is constantly talking about Rutgers negatively with Dylan and Ace is unique to this board because every post from every no name on social media is posted here

Are you saying you don’t think it will come up in discussion by game commentators during championship series that Dylan’s team at Rutgers somehow didn’t make it to the NCAAs? If so, I sure hope your right, but I’ll be very surprised.
 

CranfordKnight

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2006
4,095
3,964
113
Are you saying you don’t think it will come up in discussion by game commentators during championship series that Dylan’s team at Rutgers somehow didn’t make it to the NCAAs? If so, I sure hope your right, but I’ll be very surprised.
It could come up, but does it really have any long term effect on our program? I highly doubt it. It's more about folks around here feeling embarrassed. Which I get. But once this season is over, it will rarely be spoken of again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,048
87,017
113
Does anyone not think last year was a tough year? I said it was the most disappointing season of any team I'm a fan off. And for Harper it wasn't just the losing. It was also the ankle injury and flu that made him drop 10 pounds.
Nobody is allowed to mention the long bout with the flu and the ankle injury. Remember- the narrative is Rutgers is a laughing stock because they had two top 5 NBA draft picks and did not make the tourney. It is such a lazy and lame narrative when you consider that both Harper and Bailey were out for stretches of time and the rest of the players on that team were sub par because the AD was dead set against NIL, leaving Pikiell with no NIL budget to work with.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,048
87,017
113
The perception that everyone is constantly talking about Rutgers negatively with Dylan and Ace is unique to this board because every post from every no name on social media is posted here
There is a segment of Rutgers fans that are a strange lot-they seem to revel wallowing in misery and celebrate every negative comment on antisocial media.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
Think there’s a lot of over thinking here

having OKC get to the finals over the Spurs is “better” for Rutgers

come on

to 99.999999999999999999% of the public it makes not a bit of difference

the only people who care are overly-invested-in-certain-aspects-of-sports middle-aged men. Nobody else cares.

and the only ones who matter are the super talented teenagers that we want to play for RU

you think they give a f$$k what some guy named Kratch(?) says?

they care about the $$$$ (which this has no effect either way) and they care if they can get to the NBA (and having Ace and Dylan succeed off the bat…. Well that can ONLY possibly help).

Your worry about this will fade once you realize that the only people who bring up such topics (1) have waaaay too much time on their hands and/or (2) have an anti-ru ad to grind; and no one else knows or cares about it.

waaaaaaay overthinking thi

I don’t follow much NBA. But on more than one of the rare occasions when I happened to see one of them was playing and watched for a few minutes, the game commentator brought it up. Just a passing comment about how disappointing their college season was and how amazing it was that Rutgers didn’t even make the NCAA tournament considering what they had accomplished so quickly in the NBA. Those guys shoot the breeze about a lot of things, yes. But if I’ve heard this being discussed during more than one game broadcast this season (and I definitely have) - it’s not just some random guys with like 50 followers Tweeting out. I do watch the playoffs more than the regular season and had actually been thinking that I hadn’t heard banter about it recently. I agree with Kratch though I certainly hope what he predicted will be wrong. I guess we’ll find out soon enough. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if it’s not brought up.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
Nobody is allowed to mention the long bout with the flu and the ankle injury. Remember- the narrative is Rutgers is a laughing stock because they had two top 5 NBA draft picks and did not make the tourney. It is such a lazy and lame narrative when you consider that both Harper and Bailey were out for stretches of time and the rest of the players on that team were sub par because the AD was dead set against NIL, leaving Pikiell with no NIL budget to work with.

Yeah it’s annoying. I hate hearing it every time it comes up. I do believe that narrative crippled us last year in the portal. Not having money certainly didn’t help either.

But hey - in the long run, we created lifetime memories for those Kennesaw players who can one day tell their grandkids they beat Dylan Harper. Nevermind his 21 points on 10 of 18 shooting or the 9 assists. They still won because basketball is a team game and you can’t win with 2 great players and a collection of busts.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
It could come up, but does it really have any long term effect on our program? I highly doubt it. It's more about folks around here feeling embarrassed. Which I get. But once this season is over, it will rarely be spoken of again.

In the long run, showing we can win again with Pike is all that matters. Prove everyone wrong and get back to that tournament. Restore the brand Pike worked hard to build. And if he can’t do that, move on.

But that doesn’t change the fact that Dylan’s instant NBA stardom didn’t reflect well on the Rutgers coaching program, and the extension of that on display at the Garden right now is the furthest thing from a positive boost to the RU brand (again, maybe in a few years this changes but right now the association is not good. Down the road when he’s not a rookie and it’s just the university tied to his name when he’s announced in the line up, maybe then it’ll be different). But right now this crap is still one of the first things brought up. We’re still in the market for a few 2026-27 recruits!

To be clear, it’s not Dylan’s fault 2024-25 was a bust, and he’s a good kid. I wish him only the best personally and hope he has a great long term NBA career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,420
6,407
113
In the long run, showing we can win again with Pike is all that matters. Prove everyone wrong and get back to that tournament. Restore the brand Pike worked hard to build. And if he can’t do that, move on.

But that doesn’t change the fact that Dylan’s instant NBA stardom didn’t reflect well on the Rutgers coaching program, and the extension of that on display at the Garden right now is the furthest thing from a positive boost to the RU brand (again, maybe in a few years this changes but right now the association is not good. Down the road when he’s not a rookie and it’s just the university tied to his name when he’s announced in the line up, maybe then it’ll be different). But right now this crap is still one of the first things brought up. We’re still in the market for a few 2026-27 recruits!

To be clear, it’s not Dylan’s fault 2024-25 was a bust, and he’s a good kid. I wish him only the best personally and hope he has a great long term NBA career.

Will it be mentioned ? Yeah probably

but then you are making the assumption that it will have an effect on the recruiting decisions of 18 year olds

I can think of numerous reasons why it likely wouldn’t - but not going to bother - because I think we’ve already too much time talking about it
 
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
Will it be mentioned ? Yeah probably

but then you are making the assumption that it will have an effect on the recruiting decisions of 18 year olds

I can think of numerous reasons why it likely wouldn’t - but not going to bother - because I think we’ve already too much time talking about it

Money is the biggest tool for recruiting - program perception only has tie breaker type impact. Your right, it’s not a major blow to us like say the news of the Hobbs scandal for instance. Of course not.

To be clear, I’m simply tired of hearing it brought up, certainly don’t think it’s good pfor the program when it’s mentioned, and since my kids are big Knicks fans and so the games will be on, I’d personally have preferred for the Spurs not to have been in the game so I wouldn’t have to hear about it again.

Dylan’s participation in the finals is in no conceivable way, right now, a clear positive endorsement of RU’s program. It’s neutral at absolute best right now and any framing of otherwise is pure homerism IMO. Again - I wish only the best for Dylan and Ace personally. It’s nothing against either of them that I’d sooner just forget what happened that season.
 

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
16,223
8,038
113
Sorry, but I’m not seeing it as a negative in any way.

A high school baller, let’s say a 4-star, is gonna hear that Dylan and Ace (and let’s not forget RHJ) went to Rutgers. If they have aspirations of playing in the NBA, that’s gonna help their perception of RU.

It’s not unlike our football team, that despite a mediocre record under Schiano, has sent many players to the NFL. In both football and hoops, a hard-working talented player with NFL or NBA aspirations will at least consider Rutgers as a viable path.

As to your point about “that’s what anyone who follows college basketball is thinking,” well, if they truly follow college hoops they should know the reasons why those 2 freshmen didn’t have a supporting cast around them, and that the money issues have been addressed in this offseason.

Beyond that, the millions of NBA fans around the world who have tuned in to these playoffs and even regular season NBA games will think, “Wow, both Ron and Dylan Harper, and Ace Bailey, went to Rutgers. Must be something good going on there.”
That would be the perception until they actually looked at the results.
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
14,792
15,638
113
Agree to disagree. When the announcers say, “Dylan Harper out of Rutgers,” most people watching don’t see it as a negative for RU.
Except it's almost always followed up with somehow Rutgers had a losing record with Dylan Harper and Ace Bailey. To get that in is almost the only reason RU comes up. That stops next year when Dylan is in his second year and they rarely mention college.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSAL_Hoops

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,152
15,610
72
There have been at least 5 other teams with 2 first-round draft picks that did not make the NCAA Tournament. For those of you who have followed the NBA since 2012 (I have not), do you recall a negative national outcry about any of theses schools?
  • Michigan (2022–23): The Wolverines missed the Big Dance with a 19-15 overall record but still produced two first-round picks in the same year: Jett Howard (No. 11 overall) and Kobe Bufkin (No. 15 overall).
  • Washington (2016–17): Despite a 9-22 record, the Huskies featured two first-round selections: Markelle Fultz (No. 1 overall) and Marquese Chriss (No. 8 overall).
  • LSU (2015–16): The Tigers finished 19-14 and missed the tournament but rostered two first-rounders: Ben Simmons (No. 1 overall) and Tim Quarterman.
  • Vanderbilt (2018–19): Despite going winless in SEC play, the Commodores produced two lottery picks who ultimately went in the first round: Darius Garland (No. 5 overall) and Nassir Little (No. 25 overall).
  • Maryland (2012–13): The Terrapins missed the NCAA Tournament with a 25-13 record but had two first-round selections: Alex Len (No. 5 overall) and Dez Wells.
 

RU0917

Sophomore
Jul 21, 2025
107
120
43
This identity stuff is ridiculous. . . . .

At least one Filipino thinks so.

Only tangentially-related, but Filipino hoops fans from the Philippines are a very, um, passionate fan base. Years ago I worked with a guy who eventually got into coaching - he was coaching the Magic's summer league team a few years ago (coaches their G League team now) and the team had a Filipino guy on it. He didn't get much playing time and here's how that went.

Back to the main thrust of this thread - I definitely had my struggles watching Dylan thrive (and to a lesser extent Ace, who put together some really nice games later on in the season even as the Jazz went full tank) after our disaster of a year with them. Not surprisingly this is also a recurring theme in the RU group chat I have with some friends.

At this point, Dylan is so absurdly good so soon that I'm getting better at letting go and just enjoying the ride. Sure, every so often someone will tweet incredulously about us missing the tourney with those guys, but that's going to fade with time. In the long run I think it'll be more good than bad to have Dylan and Ace associated with RU.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
There have been at least 5 other teams with 2 first-round draft picks that did not make the NCAA Tournament. For those of you who have followed the NBA since 2012 (I have not), do you recall a negative national outcry about any of theses schools?
  • Michigan (2022–23): The Wolverines missed the Big Dance with a 19-15 overall record but still produced two first-round picks in the same year: Jett Howard (No. 11 overall) and Kobe Bufkin (No. 15 overall).
  • Washington (2016–17): Despite a 9-22 record, the Huskies featured two first-round selections: Markelle Fultz (No. 1 overall) and Marquese Chriss (No. 8 overall).
  • LSU (2015–16): The Tigers finished 19-14 and missed the tournament but rostered two first-rounders: Ben Simmons (No. 1 overall) and Tim Quarterman.
  • Vanderbilt (2018–19): Despite going winless in SEC play, the Commodores produced two lottery picks who ultimately went in the first round: Darius Garland (No. 5 overall) and Nassir Little (No. 25 overall).
  • Maryland (2012–13): The Terrapins missed the NCAA Tournament with a 25-13 record but had two first-round selections: Alex Len (No. 5 overall) and Dez Wells.

Did you use AI for that because at least some of the data is wrong. For example, Nassir Little never played for Vandy. And Garland only played in 5 games for them before season ending injury. Fultz and Chriss didn’t play together for Washington - different back to back years. Don’t think Wells or Quarterman were drafted, and so on.

Sean hit the nail on the head though regardless. This has been blown up over and over by the media as a story line because Dylan and Ace are a pair of NBA rookie top 5 lottery picks who immediately panned out - both averaged double digit points in their first seasons in the NBA despite not only failing to lead RU to the NCAAs but not even having a 500 collegiate record at RU. I’m pretty sure the past comparatives have been done by the talking heads and RUs epic failure was a first in history. The point is - most of us are tired of hearing about it. As Sean said - the story line goes away when they are no longer only a year removed from college. Thank goodness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seansherm

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,172
12,960
113
There have been at least 5 other teams with 2 first-round draft picks that did not make the NCAA Tournament. For those of you who have followed the NBA since 2012 (I have not), do you recall a negative national outcry about any of theses schools?
  • Michigan (2022–23): The Wolverines missed the Big Dance with a 19-15 overall record but still produced two first-round picks in the same year: Jett Howard (No. 11 overall) and Kobe Bufkin (No. 15 overall).
  • Washington (2016–17): Despite a 9-22 record, the Huskies featured two first-round selections: Markelle Fultz (No. 1 overall) and Marquese Chriss (No. 8 overall).
  • LSU (2015–16): The Tigers finished 19-14 and missed the tournament but rostered two first-rounders: Ben Simmons (No. 1 overall) and Tim Quarterman.
  • Vanderbilt (2018–19): Despite going winless in SEC play, the Commodores produced two lottery picks who ultimately went in the first round: Darius Garland (No. 5 overall) and Nassir Little (No. 25 overall).
  • Maryland (2012–13): The Terrapins missed the NCAA Tournament with a 25-13 record but had two first-round selections: Alex Len (No. 5 overall) and Dez Wells.

Ben Simmons thing does come up frequently.
But more so as a shot at BS and not LSU.
"Even in college BS wasn't a winning player and missed the tournament."

The rest of those are poor examples as none of those players were nearly as good immediately in the NBA as Dylan or even Ace.
Let alone the combination of players.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,734
38,200
113
It could come up, but does it really have any long term effect on our program? I highly doubt it. It's more about folks around here feeling embarrassed. Which I get. But once this season is over, it will rarely be spoken of again.

Agreed. And as noted above, people who know college ball know that Rutgers had no money for a supporting cast (and did not even have an AD).
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,734
38,200
113
Money is the biggest tool for recruiting - program perception only has tie breaker type impact. Your right, it’s not a major blow to us like say the news of the Hobbs scandal for instance. Of course not.

To be clear, I’m simply tired of hearing it brought up, certainly don’t think it’s good pfor the program when it’s mentioned, and since my kids are big Knicks fans and so the games will be on, I’d personally have preferred for the Spurs not to have been in the game so I wouldn’t have to hear about it again.

Dylan’s participation in the finals is in no conceivable way, right now, a clear positive endorsement of RU’s program. It’s neutral at absolute best right now and any framing of otherwise is pure homerism IMO. Again - I wish only the best for Dylan and Ace personally. It’s nothing against either of them that I’d sooner just forget what happened that season.

Agreed. It’s a throwaway line that doesn’t get into the nuance of what actually happened: the injuries, the lack of money for supporting cast, Hobbs firing, the fact that college bball was very old and the Big Ten is a conference for men, etc.

But it is cool to see our guys succeed and to see Pike being interviewed about them and the success they’re having. Absolutely love Ace, but Dylan is Rutgers.
 

Nycrusupporter

All-American
Jun 8, 2021
5,050
7,628
73
Will it be mentioned ? Yeah probably

but then you are making the assumption that it will have an effect on the recruiting decisions of 18 year olds

I can think of numerous reasons why it likely wouldn’t - but not going to bother - because I think we’ve already too much time talking about it
It may not be on the minds of 18 year olds, but it will be on the minds of AAU coaches who are working with kids on the NBA radar, and they will not be encouraging their kids to go to Rutgers.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,925
51,414
113
It may not be on the minds of 18 year olds, but it will be on the minds of AAU coaches who are working with kids on the NBA radar, and they will not be encouraging their kids to go to Rutgers.
They never were, it's why it was noted heavily that Dylan and Ace would be a one-time thing for the program.
 

eddynyse

Freshman
Jul 7, 2025
48
60
18
Think there’s a lot of over thinking here

having OKC get to the finals over the Spurs is “better” for Rutgers

come on

to 99.999999999999999999% of the public it makes not a bit of difference

the only people who care are overly-invested-in-certain-aspects-of-sports middle-aged men. Nobody else cares.

and the only ones who matter are the super talented teenagers that we want to play for RU

you think they give a f$$k what some guy named Kratch(?) says?

they care about the $$$$ (which this has no effect either way) and they care if they can get to the NBA (and having Ace and Dylan succeed off the bat…. Well that can ONLY possibly help).

Your worry about this will fade once you realize that the only people who bring up such topics (1) have waaaay too much time on their hands and/or (2) have an anti-ru ad to grind; and no one else knows or cares about it.

waaaaaaay overthinking this
I love RU, but if I had a very talented son or daughter, I'd probably advise them to look elsewhere until the RU administration and the fan base show a desire to win. It was criminal what happened last year with our men basketball team.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,630
12,930
78
It may not be on the minds of 18 year olds, but it will be on the minds of AAU coaches who are working with kids on the NBA radar, and they will not be encouraging their kids to go to Rutgers.
I think it had an impact last year seeing that the only 2 Americans we could convince to come here were related to Brandin Knight and connected to the program previously. A year has passed and we’re in a much better place with this (time tends to help these things. Winning helps more.)

All this said, there’s nothing positive for Rutgers in Dylan being good enough off the bat to lead the Spurs to the Championship and returning full circle to the Tri state area to play half the games no less. Like it or not, it’s a story line that we can only hope most folks won’t pay attention to - which would make it net neutral at best.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
16,223
8,038
113
Agreed. It’s a throwaway line that doesn’t get into the nuance of what actually happened: the injuries, the lack of money for supporting cast, Hobbs firing, the fact that college bball was very old and the Big Ten is a conference for men, etc.

But it is cool to see our guys succeed and to see Pike being interviewed about them and the success they’re having. Absolutely love Ace, but Dylan is Rutgers.
Sports media is not known for nuance. Or perspective. Or intelligence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777